similar to: No subject

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just installed and tested 3.0.2 for debian from backports.org. After some time I got an internal error: [2004/02/10 14:06:14, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1481) create_canon_ace_lists: malformed ACL in file ACL ! Deny entry after Allow entry. Failing to set on file Projekt 2/klaus/Siehst du - geht doch.txt. [2004/02/10

Hi, trying to investigate my xfs-acl problem I think I have found the missing part: In smbd/uid.c the function "sid_to_uid" resolves SIDs to unix user names. This is done as follows: - First the domain part of the SID is compared to the local domain (if the SID belongs to the samba server it can be resolved locally) - In any other cases winbindd is asked This works well if the

Hi, I do not know whether this is a samba problem or an NT feature, but it seems only to occur with samba boxes, so it could be samba's fault: The NT PDC (moritz) runs also the WINS server. It regularly forgets the IP addresses of our samba servers: # nmblookup -U moritz -R hni-gate querying hni-gate on 131.234.166.19 name_query failed to find name hni-gate I then just have to stop and

hi, we're using a samba-server over DSL using openVPN and the speed is very good at browsing directories and quite OK at loading/saving files except for word & excel where it takes about 20-30 seconds to save even a small file. which is no wonder because the following happens in log.smbd when i click "save" in word, it obviously checks for a bazillion tmp- and lockfiles (

Hi. samba 4.1.1.. User has unix rights for writing, but samba denies write access to him. On samba server: amistest at samba:~$ id uid=6603(amistest) gid=20(users-nis) groups=20(users-nis),2108(evis),2109(slp),2112(hernie),2126(poj),2133(hto),20000(users) -> user amistest is in "poj" group amistest at samba:~$ ls -ld ACLTEST drwxrwxr-x+ 2 hrubos vema 4096 Nov 27 11:05 ACLTEST

Hello, i just searched the archive, but had no luck with my problem. Perhaps somebody could help me please.. We use Linux with ACL Kernel 2.4.17. EXT3 File-System... My samba 2.2.8a server shows different output in the Security Tab of Files or Directorys.. If i create a new file in linux and set the permissions with setfacl -m to DOMAIN*GROUP testfile i see in the securty settings the following

Hi list, I have a weird problem. Im using samba 3.0.24 in ADS mode against a 2003 server. If I put admin users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I can connect with all users in that group. If I remove admin users and instead use valid users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I receive the following error Domain=[KIC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.24] tree connect failed:

I thought I had read a response to this. Went something like this: Word (and lots of others such apps) do not actually deal with the original file. They create a temporary file which overwrites the original when you save the new document. The 'new' file of course inherits the new editor's ownership. Hope this helps you. Noel -----Original Message----- From: Josh Konkol

Hi, there is some progress, even I would'nt call it that. At least they admitted it's caused through some changes from their side. @Rowland: Remember that "old Samba method" part? This is their answer. I don't know what to make of it. Maybe someone with more knowledge about the develoment of Samba can give me a hint:

On 29/06/2023 07:38, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi, > > there is some progress, even I would'nt call it that. At least they > admitted it's caused through some changes from their side. > > @Rowland: Remember that "old Samba method" part? > > This is their answer. I don't know what to make of it. Maybe someone > with more knowledge about the

Hello! Before this post, i'm send 3 problems in 3.0.11 I'm compiled 3.0.12rc1 and found next: 1) Settings primary group .... problem solved, but question to developer You append to mapping.c in smb_set_primary_group ret = smbrun(add_script,NULL); flush_pwnam_cache(); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ But not check ret code .....if my script exit in code != 0, i'm change

Hallo, just my 2 cents: So Samba 4.12 works, but 4.13+ doesnt? Maybe you can use the same strategy here as used for Win XP or older OS: Setup an isolated (virtualized?) DC with samba 4.12 just for the synology to connect to? You could use firewalld/ufw rules to only allow traffic to the samba ports from one single source IP-adress (the synology) to limit the exposure... Just until synology

Hi, our backup program regularly invokes smbclient to generate a tar-file from an NT-Workstation share. What it does is /usr/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\maclaurin\\maclaurin password -U backup -E -W MATH -d3 -Tc - > maclaurin.tar Now this is the output: Client started (version 2.0.6). resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name maclaurin<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup

Here is the requested config: [global] workgroup = workgroup netbios name = server server string = %h server wins support = yes dns proxy = no name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.1.1 smb ports= 445 139 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 1 max log size = 1000

Hi, I am looking for a list of theses special magic numbers that a samba server (or a windows box) registers with at a wins server. I already know of <00> as a ordinary name, <1b> as a domain. But what's the rest? Is there a list anywhere? Perhaps somewhere in the docs? I have searched them but haven't found anything yet. Thanks, Christopher --

Hi all, we are experiencing difficulties with posix ACLs using samba 3.0.28 on a Debian 4.0 etch server. The goal is to not let the Windows clients manage the ACLs but instead set the permissions from the Samba server, hence smb.conf says "nt acl support = no". Problems arise when I have a directory with default permissions for a named group, e.g. # file: ACLTest # owner: juergen #

Given the config provided as requested, any clues? TIA 23.03.2017 20:26, PF4Public via samba wrote: > Here is the requested config: > > [global] > workgroup = workgroup > netbios name = server > server string = %h server > wins support = yes > dns proxy = no > name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast > interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8

Hi, I am just fiddeling with 2.2.0 final. I am having trouble with the config files I used with 2.2.0alpha3: check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list. [2001/04/18 12:33:37, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit (connection denied) [2001/04/18 12:33:37, 5] lib/access.c:string_match(89) looking for 131.234.166.51 of domain hni in netgroup hni_hosts gave No [2001/04/18

Hi people, I am trying to migrate some users from tpop3d (Maildir mailboxes) to dovecot. The most important aspect of this migration, and which I cannot seem to get right, is to first be able to make dovecot to authenticate against the current DB being used by tpop3d so that I can use imapsync to transfer the user mails. And I do believe that is what I am unable to get right!! So here goes what