similar to: Samba-LDAP PDC - Disjoint uids required for different ou's?

Hello, Is there any way I can use the gregexpr functions (or a different function) in a manner that will also return overlapping (i.e. non disjoint) regular expressions? For instance, when running gregexpr("AAA","AAAAAA"), I get two matches, one at position 1 and one at position 4. I'd like to receive 4 matches at positions 1, 2, 3 and 4. Thanks, Schraga

Hi Lang, While working on improving the debug dumps of the PBQP graphs, I found out that we can have some edges between nodes which belong to totally disjoint register classes (for example, on AArch64, this would be an int and a floating point register). Although it is true those 2 registers interferes, in the sense they are alive at the same time, they never have any physical interference,

Dear All: We have been experiencing networking issues so I don't know if this got through; I can't see it in the archive. My sincere apologies if this appears twice. I may have found an unusual bug and am posting here to see if anyone can reproduce it on their system. First of all, sessionInfo(): > sessionInfo() R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23) i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 locale:

I am confused as with samba-tool it does practically everything and all the default methods of M$ AD are covered. For some reason OU's seem to be missing I know OU's are very Group policy orientated but also they are simply Organisational Units. The ability to list, create and delete OU's seems to be omitted. Also when you add a user the destination OU parameter is missing. Is this

I've been noticing that group policies in OU's haven't been working for me. So far I've installed samba 4.1.4 on a fresh install of FreeBSD 10.0 with UFS + acls turned on with the only shares being sysvol, and netlogon. I can get Windows 7 machines to take policies that are in the root of my domain. If I create an OU move a computer or user to that OU and move the policy to that

Hi all I have a samba 3.0.21c with OpenLDAP 2.3.19 , as PDC where almost 200 Workstations in the domain, most of my workstations are windows xp, & 2000 professional. but sometimes some of the system get disjoint from the domain, if we do ipconfig/flushdns and ipconfig/registerdns and wait for 5 min, and reboot and login, it logs on, ie it doesn't complain that computer is not in the

Hi all, I have a configuration for a samba file server that I’m trying to get properly implemented. The issue isn’t with the shares but is with the user and groups lookups. The server resides in a nested container such as: >> samdom.com          >> Users_And_Computers                   >> CA_LOCATION_ON                         >> Servers

dear experts, I would like to setup idmap config ad. I have already the uidNumber attribute populated on AD. But there is something very basic wrong with my config: [global] netbios name = ADDC realm = EXAMPLE.ORG workgroup = EXAMPLEAD dns forwarder = #trimmed server role = active directory domain controller log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m interfaces = eth0,

My organization has several next cloud instances running with users in different ou's without any issue On Wed., Nov. 4, 2020, 2:39 a.m. L.P.H. van Belle via samba, < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > The problem with using OU's, is that a user can only be in one OU, so > > what if the user needs to be in more than one ? > > > > I would rely on group

Hi Matthew, > I'm investigating a problem with "Machine Instruction Scheduling" that is rooted > in incorrect alias information. > > Things go wrong in the "Merge disjoint stack slots"[1] pass when a store > instruction fails to get updated after its stack slot is merged. As a result, > when "Machine Instruction Scheduling" runs, it incorrectly

I am trying to implement the following structure in OpenLDAP for a backend to Samba 3: / ou=People /ou=Internal-----<- ou=Groups dc=btd,dc=com ---< \ ou=Computers \ou=External I have been able to authenticate users but they are only able to access shares based on their primary group. I am wondering if

Hey all, I'm looking to merge multiple NT4 domains into a single infrastructure based on Samba3 and OpenLDAP on Linux of the Debian Sarge flavour (and, Bob willing, Samba4 before long). In order to allow some resources to be shared from a single Linux instance, I'm rather hoping that I can put every domain's information into a single LDAP DIT. The Samba PDCs will use only portions of

Hello all. I'm investigating a problem with "Machine Instruction Scheduling" that is rooted in incorrect alias information. Things go wrong in the "Merge disjoint stack slots"[1] pass when a store instruction fails to get updated after its stack slot is merged. As a result, when "Machine Instruction Scheduling" runs, it incorrectly re-orders the store and a

Hi Matthijs, Sorry for not responding earlier. I have a few comments. On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi Mon Ping, > > I've again attached a patch, wich lets LLVM know about about the > relations > between different address spaces. Instead of cramming this info in > with > TargetData (with all kinds of unwanted side effects, especially for

I'm working on a backend for a target with multiple functional units, each with a dedicated register file. Several instructions can operate on any one of the functional units. For example there is an add instruction on the A unit that adds two A registers, and another on the D unit that adds two D registers, but neither can use the other's registers. From a selection point of view either

I have been looking through the LLVM documentation, and I have decided that I would be interested in producing a functional front-end for it, if only to determine how applicable the optimizations that it already performs are to such a language. However, I have run into one obstacle that would make it difficult to write many of the things I would like to do. Is there a way to represent a

Hi Clemens, On 02/02/12 14:25, Clemens Hammacher wrote: > On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: ... >> what do you mean by "copied over to the main module"? If you want to add >> additional IR to the main module then you should link it in using the linker. > > I think that the linker would indeed be able to remap the types correctly, but > the main obstacle here

Hi , I need to use ntlm_auth across two different AD domains and their is no trust between the 2 domains. I followed the post http://samba-multiple-domains.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/how-to-join-one-linux-box-to-two.html <https://deref-mail.com/mail/client/44YIgEylY9w/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fsamba-multiple-domains.blogspot.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2Fhow-to-join-one-linux-box-to-two.html>

So, you can't have disjoint sets, and have one of set that says "i access everything". Because it would contain everything :) Thus, I assume by your description you meant "we want to maintain multiple disjoint partitions of the same set of accesses" (which is not quite the same as just having one special partition). When one partition is a refinement of the other (as

Hi Clemens, On 02/02/12 13:30, Clemens Hammacher wrote: > Hi Chris, > thanks for your answer! > > On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> The linker has to solve the exact same problem (read multiple .bc files and >> unify types across them). This is the impetus behind TypeMapTy in >> lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp. You'll probably need to do something like that.