similar to: only owner (and root) can change attributes?

Hi all, Well, I'm getting somewhere I think, I now have both ACL support and domain login basically working. However I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to proceed. Basically I want to copy over a large number of files and directories (~300k files, ~60Gb total) from an existing W2k server to a Samba server. These files have existing ACLs set, so I need to preserve them somehow. I can

I had a similar issue on my Debian box. It seemed that setfacl didn't care for special characters. I changed the separator character to - (dash) instead of + or \ and it worked fine. Good luck! Tom Hallewell Radio Free Asia Washington DC USA > > (offlist replies discontinued due to increasing large number of people > involved) > > Gareth Davies wrote: > >

Hi all, I'm using the latest alpha version (the one that comes with Debian unstable) in domain mode, setting up a member file server, with domain clients authenticating to a W2k machine. I'm trying to use the "add user script" option to create new users automagically, but it never seems to run. The script in this case is a handwritten perl script, and I've added a

[global] coding system = client code page = 850 code page directory = /var/lib/samba/codepages workgroup = MICROVERSE netbios name = netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = Samba Server %v interfaces = bind interfaces only = No security = USER encrypt passwords = Yes

Hi all, I'm having trouble making Samba recognise ACLs properly - a W2k client isn't using them fully. I have patched the kernel, recompiled Samba, etc. I've gotten it working to the point where the kernel-side of things seems to work fine (with getfacl, etc). Also, the W2k machine (via Samba) can see the ACL settings that are applied to a file. The problem arises when I try

Hi all, The two problems I'm having with ACLs on a W2k domain are still no closer to a solution. To wit, they were: (a) Users accessing the ACL properties dialog on W2k can modify and remove existing ACLs on a given file, but they cannot add new ones (that can only be done with setfacl on the cmdline; the changes are then recognised); (b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames

It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd against winbindd to see if it is linking to libacl.so.1? I recently had very similar symptoms running 2.2.7 under Debian and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (this might work best if you put this line before --with-msdfs) --with-acl-support in debian/rules, Plus you have to

You should be able to find the server in W2K's server manager and confirm that it is a trusted member of the Domain. It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd to see if you are linking to libacl.so.1? My recent problem was similar and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (Max said you should have this before

Hi all, I'm trying to use xcopy /o to copy files from a W2k file server to a Samba 2.2.7 box (Samba manually compiled with ACLs). I'm coming up with Access Denied, as documented here: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-June/074548.html I gather that the "force unknown acl users" config option is supposed to fix that, although I haven't had a chance to try it out

Hi all, I'm using the smbcacls command to query a W2k server from a Linux Samba 2.2.7a client. (This is for the script that I'm writing, which I will post soon - I know at least one person was interested...) It all works fine, but it's very slow - it takes about 1 second per file. "Very" in this case is relative, but since I intend to run it on ~150k files... I've

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

Sorry about this one being long, and I apologise beforehand if there is something obvious here that I have missed. I am new to creating my own functions in R, and I am uncertain of how they work. I have a data set that I have read into a data frame: > gctable[1:5,] refseq geometry X60_origin X60_terminus length kingdom 1 NC_009484 cir 1790000 773000 3389227 Bacteria 2

Me too, also gmail. I emailed the list owner a couple of days ago, but no reply. Is everyone else affected also forwarding to another email address (gmail or not)? Could be wrong, but I'm guessing there may be an incorrect DMARC policy somewhere - although this is the only fail I could find in the headers. bounces at lists.digium.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE)

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> > > I

> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > sudo apt-get install build-essential > > sudo apt-get build-dep gcc-multilib > > sudo apt-get install gcc-multilib > > > > sudo apt-get install nasm > > sudo apt-get install uuid-dev > > > > I run > > #make spotless > > #make > > > > but it

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some

Ditto; a Gmail issue? Andrew On 12 June 2017 at 16:00, Marcelo Terres <mhterres at gmail.com> wrote: > It is happening the same with me. > > Regards, > Marcelo H. Terres <mhterres at gmail.com> > IM: mhterres at jabber.mundoopensource.com.br > https://www.mundoopensource.com.br > https://twitter.com/mhterres > https://linkedin.com/in/marceloterres > >

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the first reply sent by Geert in > order to actually reply to the OP... What is visible in the