similar to: samba 2.0.6 on HP-UX 11.0

Thanks to Will Saxon I'm finally able to mount Samba shares on my 5.1-R box using the command mount_smbfs -I 129.197.36.34 -W acct01 //bfosdick@129.197.36.34/net-11 /sp/net-11 which then prompts me for my password. So now the question is...how do I put this in /etc/fstab? What do I do about the password?

Using Samba v2.0.10 on a RedHat v7.1 box, I see that the Win98 clients on our network are making sporatic requests for user "nobody" (as shown below). Anyone know what's going on here? My network has both Linux and Win98 clients, but only the Win98 clients are showing this behavior. Both the Linux and Win98 clients access the same shared drives, but only the Win98 clients use

I know 5.1 isn't considered part of -stable, but it doesn't really seem like -current either, so I'm asking here. If this is the wrong place please let me know where I should be. At work I have a 5.1-R box that I'm trying to use to mount shares from a Sun box running samba 2.2.0 as well as some Win2K boxes. Both the sun and win2k machines authenticate to the company's domain

Hello everyone, we try to use a server running linux in an NT-domain and get the error message given in the subject-line. More details from the logfile and smb.conf are given below. Can anyone give us a hint what the problem is? (Of course...) The problem is very urgent for us. Thanks a lot in advance. Helmut Rickel ================= smb.conf ======================== [global]

We are seeing erratic behaviour from Samba for connecting Unix drives to an NT terminal Server. Samba version 2.0.6 Solaris 2.6 NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition with service pack 4 running WinCenter NIS Logon Utility. The NT server is not part of a domain and uses the WinCenter Logon Utility to authenticate username and passwords from my Unix NIS server. Samba is set up for server level

Hello, I'm having a problem configuring samba (2.0.5a) on a Linux system using NIS+ as the password system. Samba complains that it cannot find the smbpasswd file, which is not surprising as I'm not using one. I tried 'smb password file = passwd.org_dir' that sort of worked, except that it creates a directory called passwd.org_dir from whatever directory I ran the smbd from.

Hi, It's been a while since I created my smbpasswd file, and therefore it is no longer in synch with my Unix file. I've added and removed users over time, and now I need a way to update the 'smbpasswd' file without losing the encrypted passwords that are already in place (ie. I don't want to just run 'makesmbpasswd.sh' again). So, I've written the

I sent the following to sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org and I'm also forwarding this to the samba list. I hope you can help: ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- I have an emergency and am at the end of my resources and hope you can help. I'm a samba newbie and hope you can point me to an answer. Our Samba2.0.5 server is a Sun Enterprise 450 (Solaris 7). Our PDC is an NT

I am running samba version 2.0.7 on a HP 11.00 server. I have a local pc account that is trying to access a samba share and is being prompted for a username and password (which usually does not happen). When I look in the log file, I see the following. How can I troubleshoot this. Any help is appreciated. [2002/11/21 15:33:04, 1] smbd/reply.c:(988) Username pcguest is invalid on this system

Why not use OpenSips/Kamailoo in between? Where you want 1.1.1.1 you pass it along as is. Where you want 2.2.2.2 change the sdp in opensips/kamailio On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 20:44 David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know a way with chan_sip to tell Asterisk to use a specific IP > address for its end of the communication for a specific

Hi all, Set-up: Local NT4-RESOURCE domain which the Samba server is a member off. One NT4-ADMIN domain with users accounts and one W2K domain with some other user accounts. A one way trust from NT4-ADMIN to NT4-RESOURCE and a one way trust from W2K to NT4-RESOURCE. Samba version 2.0.7 running on Solaris 2.6. According to the NT admins, the W2K domain is in native mode, but they still use

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Cunningham" <billcun at suddenlink.net> To: "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Cc: "For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa" <syslinux at zytor.com> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2014 9:31 AM Subject: Re: [syslinux] bootable dvd > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gene Cumm"

Hello, A moron has checked in a DVD iso into subversion. How can I undo the damage, and make the repo a sensible size again? Also, is there a cunning way to get subversion to say: "Oi! Moron! This file is huge, you can't check it in!" ? S.

In order to catch a missing "REQUIRES: x86", it might be a good idea to set up a build bot without the x86 support. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:53 AM Peter Smith via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello Joel, > > I don't think that there is a cunning plan with REQUIRES. I seem to > remember that there was some debate over the testing strategy and

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> To: "Bill Cunningham" <billcun at suddenlink.net> Cc: "For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa" <syslinux at zytor.com> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2014 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [syslinux] bootable dvd > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Bill Cunningham <billcun at

OK, thank you George. On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 03:16, George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:13 PM David Cunningham < > dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > >> Hi George, >> >> Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a >> transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip.

If I build lld without x86 support (i.e. with "cmake -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64”) there are 117 tests that fail “make check-lld”. Upon examination, all are x86 related. There are multiple (884) tests that have “REQUIRES:.*x86” in the tests directory. Was there a cunning plan regarding the use of REQUIRES that I couldn’t discern? It seems that either 117 “REQUIRES” need to be added or

I don't know in that specific output what happened. Your best course of action is to add further logging or step through the logic with all of the knowledge you have of the RTP streams to understand what is happening. On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:52 PM David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Thank you for that. From the code it kind of looks like

Hi Joshua, Thank you for that. From the code it kind of looks like STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT is a minimum, not a maximum: if (!ast_sockaddr_isnull(&rtp->strict_rtp_address) && STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT < ast_tvdiff_ms(ast_tvnow(), rtp->rtp_source_learn.start)) { ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning complete - Locking on source address %s\n", Our call shows: #

Hi Steve, What language is that please? We're using Perl and so far I haven't found an equivalent there. Thanks for your help. On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 12:10, Steve Edwards <asterisk.org at sedwards.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, David Cunningham wrote: > > > We have a need to record audio and allow the user to press any DTMF key > > to end the recording.