similar to: Samba 2.5 PDC + WinXP problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Samba 2.5 PDC + WinXP problem"

2002 Oct 16
1
Problem with PDC + Printing
Hey all, i've got a problem setting Samba as PDC + Printing, The shared printers work perfectly while i'm not logged into the domain... - i can install printers under windows - i can print to installed printers The PDC (without printing) works perfectly... - i can join the domain as root - i can log into the domain as a unix/samba user - i can access to domain shares But when i try to
2002 Oct 30
1
Trouble with XP/Pro and Samba PDC
Hi all, i have some trouble with my Samba PDC and XP. The XP-Box joins the samba-domain without problems. The machine trust accounts also appear in passwd-file correctly. The problem is that i can't log in to the xp-box (domain) after i joined the domain. The error message tells me that xp can't find the domain controller or the user account. I am trying to log in with the same account as
2002 Dec 22
3
.ssh files
I burned an .iso cd of the home dir of a server, my .ssh files are there, but if I restore from the cd using rsync -azurvp /mnt/cdrom/.ssh/* ~/.ssh the permissions seem screwy. I'm trying to use my id_dsa ssh key to login to other servers, but they don't acknowledge the key because the "permission are incorrect". Any Suggestions? Did i screwup, by using mkisofs &
2010 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
Oh yes you're right, I missed that :) But the point still hold. Amaury Pouly 2010/8/8 Eugene Toder <eltoder at gmail.com> > > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set > > I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? > assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. > > Eugene > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury
2010 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
Right, later in the same file we have: // Reserve entries in the vector for each of the SUnits we are creating. This // ensure that reallocation of the vector won't happen, so SUnit*'s won't get // invalidated. // FIXME: Multiply by 2 because we may clone nodes during scheduling. // This is a temporary workaround. SUnits.reserve(NumNodes * 2); So for some reason *2 is
2010 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
Hello, I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm code when I realize something terrible. The scheduling code builds a graph made up of SUnit * nodes (see ScheduleDAG*.{cpp,h}). These SUnits nodes are allocated via a std::vector< SUnit >. This isn't a problem as long as the pointers are taken after the vector is fully filled and the vector never changes
2004 Apr 09
3
Samba Shares and Win32 Viruses
Hi Collective users of Samba, (does has a nice ring to it eh?) Recently I found a my samba server being infected by win32 viruses. Though it does not affect the server in any way, I do find them to be an annoyance. I understand also that I can perform "veto" of files like *.exe in smb.conf but find that to be a wee bit restrictive. There are some users who stores valid executables in
2002 Nov 04
3
Trouble with groups
I'm having trouble getting myself in to the administrators group. I'm using samba as a domain controller. I have a samba account called administrator. I have these settings in my smb.conf:: domain group map = /etc/samba/groups.mapping domain user map = /etc/samba/domainuser.mapping local group map = /etc/samba/localgroup.mapping This is in my domainuser.mapping to alias the
2015 Nov 26
4
About password expiry
Hi every one: I'm using samba4 as domain controller and a I want to check every 1 hour in my mail server the password expiration for every user in the domain. I need to kow what is the attribute used in samba4. Using ldbsearch i see badPasswordTime and accountExpires, but in the microsoft documentation said that accountExpires is used for represent the date when the account expires. Can i use
2018 May 30
5
Deprecating ADDC/ADDE/SUBC/SUBE
These opcodes have been deprecated about a year ago, but still in use in various backend. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47422 I would like to change the behavior of the backend to not enable the use of these opcodes by default. The opcode remains usable by any backend that wish to use them, but that should limit the situation where newer backend just use them as they are enabled by default. This
2006 Mar 03
2
Autofill phonebook??
Most softphnes (like Idefisk and X-Lite) have a phonebook. Is there a way I can fill those phonebooks with info from the Asterisk server? Amaury Rodr?guez http://liberadospucmm.blogspot.com http://groups.msn.com/telematicaPUCMM2002 Go OpenSource And Be FREE!! --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
2017 May 22
2
Optimizing diamond pattern in DAGCombine
Explicitly re-adding a node to be processed doesn't work, because the processing order is canonical. 2017-05-22 11:39 GMT-07:00 Nirav Davé <niravd at google.com>: > You can always explicitly add D to the worklist when you make the > transformation with AddToWorklist. Presuambly this was the cause for your > infinite loop. > > -Nirav > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at
2017 Feb 08
3
Problem ScheduleDAG on PowerPC, X86 works fine.
I don't think that'd work, because it leaves all other backends broken. AFAICT, your transform is simply not a legal transform, with the way the ADDC/ADDE opcodes are currently defined, and to do it you really need to fix the opcode definitions to not involve glue, first. I also note that your transform doesn't actually trigger at all on this particular test case on x86, because the
2010 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Usage of pointers to elements of a std::vector that might be reallocated
> Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. Eugene On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury Pouly <amaury.pouly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm > code when I realize
2017 Feb 09
2
Problem ScheduleDAG on PowerPC, X86 works fine.
I'd think i1 would be the proper and correct choice for a carry flag for the generic instruction. I expect that would also make UADDO/USUBO redundant with ADDC/SUBC (which would seem a good outcome). You'd need to make sure the right thing happened when converting from ADDC's 1-bit carry in/out to X86ISD::AD[DC]'s EFLAGS i/o. Right now the conversion can get away with assuming
2005 Sep 30
4
G.729 patent in France
Hi all, I am building an Asterisk PBX with voicemail and music on hold functions. An ISDN BRI line will also be available and G.729 IP-phones will be used. Are there patents rights applicable to France? Which licence could I use and how many ones are required (only one per phone or also for voicemail and MOH)? Regards Amaury -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2010 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] Assertion failure in tablegen: rationale ?
Hello, I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug): class Bli<string _t> { string t = _t; } class Bla<list<Bli> _bli> : Bli<!car(_bli).t> { } #0 0x00007ffff6ebda75 in *__GI_raise
2017 Feb 07
2
Problem ScheduleDAG on PowerPC, X86 works fine.
Would it not make sense to refactor the code so those don't use glue rather than emitting them with glue and then getting rid of it. There are times when we would like to emit these in separate blocks but can't (presumably because of the glue). On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:15 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > That's seems really odd that
2010 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] Assertion failure in tablegen: rationale ?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Amaury Pouly wrote: > Hello, > I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug): David, can you take a look? This is related to your lisp interpreter :) -Chris > > class
2017 Feb 07
2
Problem ScheduleDAG on PowerPC, X86 works fine.
Long story short: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31890 The backend fails to schedule a given DAG, the reason being that there is an instruction and it glue that needs to be broken apart as they can't be scheduled consecutively. See attached file for a picture of the DAG. Not sure what's the best course of action is, and not sure why this isn't a problem for the X86 backend