similar to: Ext3 and undeletion - A way how it could work.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Ext3 and undeletion - A way how it could work."

2002 Jul 24
0
ext3 orphaned inode list error
Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.
2002 Jul 24
2
ext3 orphaned inode list
Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.
2002 May 07
3
inodes 100% full, how do I know?
How can you know beforehand, without running fsck, that all inodes are used of a particular ext3 filesystem? Default systemtools use output from df, which shows only a 50% usage of the filesystem, and pretend nothing is wrong, while you really cant't move or copy a file to it. So I only found out when running fsck. This is my output from fsck (RH7.2, stock kernel, stock? ext3): root# fsck
2005 Jul 08
2
Accidentally issued "mkswap" on ext3 fs -- recovery possible?
Hi, I accidentally issued "mkswap" on a used ext3 fs partition (~30G) :-/ I have analyzed the behaviour of mkswap using two test files and it appears to only change "some" bytes: --8<-- --- swap2.xxd 2005-07-04 21:00:10.157261360 +0200 +++ swap1.xxd 2005-07-04 21:00:01.894517488 +0200 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ 00003d0: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................
2002 Dec 01
1
another idiot and ext3 - The inode is from a bad block in the inode table
i too am an idiot.. and request help here's the sccop i originally formatted the drive with 3 partitions and installed rh8 /boot / swap everything worked. my plan was to have this drive only be a data drive so i inatlled rh8 on another drive and mounted this one on /share so /share looked like /share /bin /sbin /mp3 /usr /etc /dev and so on so i deleted all the
2003 Jan 23
3
e2fsck too old / ext3 HTREE errors
hi, i have a tricky situation here and and don't know where to start with the solution. i happened to set up a linux system, but i had to install the base system on another machine. i used e2fsprogs 1.30-WIP (30-Sep-2002) for this. now the machine is up and running, but i have to use e2fsprogs 1.27 (8-Mar-2002). it's a debian system and i wanted to stay sane & stable, hence using
2007 Apr 04
1
fsck.ext3 reporting large file I cannot find
I am checking a file system (ext3) as shown below. It is actually a fresh file system, as I had deleted all partitions and created an ext3 file system. But when I run the check with the verbose option, it says I have one large file. Am I missing something here, or is it odd that I cannot find this large file it is reporting? I reviewed some documentation on ext3 file systems, and experimented
2009 Dec 29
2
ext3 partition size
Hi all, I am running fedora 11 with kernel 2.6.30.9-102.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 4 00:18:53 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux. I am noticing a partition on my drive is reporting incorrect size with "df", the partition is ext3 size 204GB with about 79GB actual usage, the "df" result show the partition size to be 111GB, 93GB is missing. Please advice on what
2006 Sep 24
1
Retaining undelete data on ext3
Having just spent a day trying to recover a deleted ext3 file for a friend, I'm wondering about this way of maintining undelete information in ext3, like is done for ext2: The last step in the deletion process would be to put back the (previously zeroed) block pointers. Since it gets logged to the journal, I _think_ that this should be safe. The worst that would happen is that, if the plug
2001 Nov 28
1
Reading output from "debugfs -R stat <8>"
Hi, I'm trying to understand if my journal is fragmented. Here's some output from `debugfs -R "stat <8>" /dev/sda3`: Inode: 8 Type: regular Mode: 0600 Flags: 0x0 Generation: 0 User: 0 Group: 0 Size: 104857600 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 1 Blockcount: 205016 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x3c0442fd -- Tue Nov 27
2007 Oct 24
1
Problem with file system
While I untar a large archive on xfs , ext3 (ver 1.3 and ver 1.4) file systems , on ppc processor and kernel ver 2.6.21 , I get an error. Also sometimes, on ext3 (1.3 and 1.4) the file system goes read-only while untarring. The same tar file when untarred on a i386 machine works properly. ERROR: -------------- tar: Skipping to next header gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error tar:
2008 Jul 09
1
netCDF to TIFF
Greetings R users! I am working with the ENSEMBLE climate data (10 min resolution daily temperatures images for all of Europe 1950-2006). The data comes packaged in a single netCDF file. I would like to read the data in and export a subset (2002-2006) as geotiffs (one image per day). So far, I can successfully read in the data and view the images within an R display window. However, I have yet to
2011 May 08
1
questions about the output of "gee" and its summary
Dear R-helpers, I am using the package "gee" to run a marginal model. Here is the output. In my simulated data, both x and z are time-varying, so I include their interaction terms with time indicator (i.e. tind=0, if time 1, and 1 if time 2) The data is simulated, so the true parameter of z both at time 1 and time 2 is 5, which is very close from the model output for time 1, z =
2003 Sep 18
2
BIG Bug on Linux EXT3 file system, or "/bin/ls" problem?? Please Help!!!
Hi, all, I "found" a big bug either related with Linux Ext3 file system or "bin/ls" command. The problem is: File system is no more than 220GB, but "/bin/ls" reports holding >370GB data! The system is Redhat 8.0, with a Generic Kernel 2.4.20. Any suggestions are greately appreciated. more information can be available upon requests. The following is the
2009 Apr 17
2
E2fsck and large file
How big is a file that e2fsck considers it to be a large file? 814611 blocks used (42.79%) 0 bad blocks 1 large file <----- that Thanks John Nelson
2005 Jun 20
0
[patch 2/3] fs/ext3/resize.c: fix sparse warnings
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: sparse-fs_ext3_resize.patch URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20050620/8e33ffa8/attachment.ksh>
2005 Feb 15
1
[PATCH] ext3: Fix sparse -Wbitwise warnings.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at mail.ru> --- fs/ext3/resize.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- fs/ext3/super.c | 8 ++++---- include/linux/ext3_fs.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) Index: linux-warnings/include/linux/ext3_fs.h =================================================================== ---
2005 Jul 08
1
filesystem fragmentation stats?
Let me preface this by saying "Yes, I know *nix filesystems don't need to worry about fragmentation". That said, is there a way to check the overall level of fragmentation of a live ext3 filesystem? I know about filefrag, but that's for specific files. And I think e2fsck tells you, but only if you take the filesystem offline for the scan. Is there anything that will give
2005 Mar 29
0
setAs between a new S4 class and "POSIXlt"
Dear R core team Please apologize for posting the same question twice on R-help and R-devel. Since I was not sure which list is appropriate I tried R-help (Tue Mar 22), but got no answer. Now I do not know if the formulation of my question was unclear or the question is not so easy to answer or to easy (what I do not hope). My problem: I create a new S4 class, containing one slot, data (of
2005 Mar 22
0
setAs between a new S4 class and "POSIXlt"
Dear R gurus I've a question concerning the transformation of a new S4 class (that I defined) and the existing class "POSIXlt". I did the following: ## Definition of the new class: setClass("dtime", representation(data = "POSIXlt"), prototype(data = as.POSIXlt("2004/06/01"))) ## Transformation between the new class "dtime"