similar to: Outlook XP on NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition & Samba

Please help, We've searched high and low for a solution, but nothing. We're upgrading our Office 2000 to Office XP on Metaframe 1.8/NT TSE. We use a Samba 2.0.7 and 2.2.2 on Solaris 2.6 and 2.8 respectively. Both are disallowing the user to write to their outlook.pst file. What's more, we can compact the PST file, but ONLY OUTSIDE of outlook (example, right clicking on properties

No one on the planet has seemed to answer this question. After an hour or so of trying to fix this problem myself, I now have the answer, at least a temp fix for it. I just linked /usr/local/lib/libiconf.so.2 /lib/libiconf.so.2 in Solaris 9. Seems to get Swat working again. ========= Original message ========= Hi! I'm having some trouble getting SWAT to run on a

Hi, I just downloaded the latest version of Samba in the form of samba-latest.tar.gz Managed to unzip it with gunzip but cannot figure out how to install it. Tried rpm but didn't work. I have an earlier version of Samba (2.0.6) on my SuSE 6.4 machine already. Can I just install the new version or do I need to do some sort of uninstall of the previous version first. advTHANKSance, Mariann

I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not saving correctly, and also with files not unzipping or copying correctly. I suspect it's some sort of incompatibility between Samba and Terminal Server/Metaframe and/or SP4. For

I am running Citrix Metaframe XP on Windows 2000 server and would like to have the ability to access files on my AIX Unix server. Are there any issues with Samba in a Windows Terminal Server environment? Thanks, Tim Brooks

On Samba 1.9.18p10 and previous versions, each of the multiple users on the same Windows Terminal Server Edition machine would get their own smbd process. With Samba 2.0.x (I'm currently testing 2.0.4b), this has changed so that every user on a WTSE machine uses the same smbd process. File ownerships are assigned correctly, but file locking does not work. If one user on a WTSE machine has a

I have set up Samba 2.0.4 on Fedora Core 1 as the PDC for the domain, and we have a Win2003 server as a member server w/ Citrix MetaFrame Presentation Server 3.0 installed. Domain users can log in locally just fine, but only local users can log in through Citrix or RDP. When a domain user tries to log on remotely, Win2003 rolls the progress bar for a few seconds, and then responds: The

Hello, I have a Samba PDC running (using LDAP in the back-end). I'm able to join systems to the domain, and log in to each machine, at the console, as domain users. However, when I try to log into our Win2k Terminal Server (w/ Citrix Metaframe), the log in session crashes with winlogon.exe trying to reference memory. If I log into the machine via terminal server, as a local

Hi all, I have a Dell PowerEdge 6300 running Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition (SP5) + Citrix MetaFrame 1.8. We are running Samba 2.0.4 on a Sun Enterprise 4500 with Solaris 7. The smb.conf specifies server-based authentication, and specifies the Terminal Server as the password server. The users are not allowed to directly log on to the Sun box, so on that server

I have an issue where one client machine (out of 10, the only one running 'xp home media') is being forced off periodically and closing XP's file browser. It seems to be random. My Samba configuration is a simple one -- just sharing files, it is not handling authentication. All other clients work as expected: Log in, for the first time, access as many times as desired after the

Hi, We a re planning to migrate from the Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server to the Windows 2000 version sometime within the next few weeks. From the newsgroups and have gathered that the MULIPLEUSERSONCONNECTION registry option that allowed each connection from the Terminal Server to start a separate smb process has been disabled in the 2000 version. Is there any work arounds that can be done in

I was wondering, does Dovecot's IMAP server hand Outlook XP's contact lists? I tried to enter a contact on my IMAP server and received an error from Outlook stating that the Contacts formatting was too complex and thus couldn't be saved. I went ahead and swung my box over to MailDir and scrapped Sendmail for Postfix [for maildir support], I was wondering, would this issue continue? In

Hi, Is it possible to use samba with Citrix Metaframe to allow Unix users running Windows applications and having access to their unix directories? I'd like to know if there is no problem of authentication and permissions. Thanks in advance Benoit.

Hi Folks, I was wondering if anybody else on this list is using, or trying to use, Samba (esp. on an IBM mainframe) as a print server in a Citrix Metaframe environment, or are we the first? We're getting one or two odd problems... Metaframe is creating the printers on our Samba server as "Client" printers, rather that connecting to them direct. We can connect and print fine from

I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no avail. (Like this one http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before compilation - - ie how to compile samba to a 64 bit application to get more available file

Troy, This does work in the security=domain situations (This is what I am currently using in my smb.conf). You do not need to do anything special for joining the doman when using the aliases. Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:15:44 -0600 From: "Troy.A Johnson" <troy.johnson@health.state.mn.us> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: [Samba] security=domain and Citrix MetaFrame on

Does this work for: security = domain situations? Do you have to do anything special with regard to joining the domain. >>> <Drew.Zeller@statcan.ca> 11/27/02 09:16AM >>> I saw your postings and thought I would through in my two cents for the Windows 2000 Terminal Server and Samba. The MultipleUsersOnConnection does not seem to work in Windows 2000 version of Terminal

I found a post from a year ago which matches my current situation almost exactly, except that we are using samba 2.09. Anyone resolve this yet? Here's the previous text... *********************************** I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not

I have recently played with and did get a working copy of Asterisk functioning in the lab environment. Then when I moved it out of the lab and onto the outside of our firewall it functions as before except that I get a Connected to Asterisk CVS-08/21/04-12:16:04 currently running on 63 (pid = 1478) ??? -- Starting Skinny session from ??.???.114.131 (PIX (6.3) our firewall) Aug 26 14:48:34

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1