similar to: interfaces option question

Hello again list! I'm attempting to use the following command in a startup batch file: net use U: \\mail\%U however when win9* runs this file on logging in, it tries to map \\mail\u Why isn't samba preprocessing this directive? (\\mail is NOT the name of the samba server doing the login authetication!) Please respond to mblinn@peopleplaces.org -- my mail client may be configured

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

First of all, thanks to everyone who has helped me out so far resolving my samba problems! The latest has to do with LPRng and directory permissions. LPRng requires 0600 permissions on the spool directory, owner daemon group daemon. Whenever a user tries to print through SAMBA, they do not have write access to the spool directory, as teh job comes in user/group of the person who printed. Any

Hello all, I recently upgraded my Windows 10 installation from 1.1pre15 to 1.1pre16 and it appears that hosts with multiple address are behaving differently. My host file looks like this: -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- ... -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- Ed25519PublicKey = ... Subnet = ... Address = ...LAN_IP... Address = ...WAN_IP... In 1.1pre15 eventually my machine would

I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this doesn't seem to be quite working on the new system. Specifically, while it seems to be routing ok, you cannot connect to anything on the inside net (e.g., with ssh or

Hello All, I have a strange problem regarding samba 3.0.37 I have samba server installed in the local network behind NAT, the router iptables are configured as follows: #samba $IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p udp -d $INET_IP -m multiport --dports 137,138 -j DNAT --to-destination $FILESERV $IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p tcp -d $INET_IP -m multiport

I'm trying to set up Johannes's DSpam plugin for dovecot. I've compiled rc2 and the plugin, and have things installed OK. I have a X-DSPAM-Signature in my message that is delivered to Inbox. Whenever I try to move this to my spam folder (I changed source to say 'Spam' instead of 'SPAM'), my client (Thunderbird) pops up 'The current command did not succeed. The

Hi all i have big problem,I am newbie and my english is bad,but i know you can help solve my problem. I have box with gentoo,I live in latvia and i have 2 ISP: One isp gives me ip range from 62.85.71.1-62.85.71.15 (62.85.71.1 is gateway) but there is only latvian trafik - no other countries (link is 2 mbit Asinhronus dsl) and other isp who gives me one ip from dhcp adn there ios no trafik

Hi, I am connected to two DSL providers (DSL 1 - 1Mbps downlink/384kbps uplink and DSL 2 - 2Mbps downlink/512kpbs uplink) I would like to only allow ftp, pop3 and http via the DSL 1 and only smtp, ipsec and pptp via DSL 2. How can I do so? Can I use iproute to route these protocols? Below is my ip routing: - # DSL 1 ip route add 2.2.2.208/30 dev eth0 src 2.2.2.210 table 1 ip route add

Hi guys, Can you take a look at this? :) +-----------+ | | eth1-|- | | -|-eth0---LAN--- | | eth2-|- | | | +-----------+ - eth0 is connected to the LAN having the IP=LAN_IP eth1 is connected to the first ISP having IP=ISP_IP_1 and GW=ISP_GW_1 eth2 is connected to the second ISP having IP=ISP_IP_2 and GW=ISP_GW_2 I need

Hi all, Can someone please help with a tcng setup? I have played with tc and tcng in the past, and now would like to get some serious rules in place. However, I have a difficulty in setting them up. My setup is as follows: One machine working as a firewall: eth0 is the interface connected to a 512K DSL line eth1 is connected to a LAN eth2 is connected to another LAN, a bit like a DMZ eth1 and

Does anyone happen to know any good ways of securing my linux box from people outside our network?

Hello! I have set up a LINUX router with two seperate uplinks to do load balancing. I made all the configuration after the "NANO-HOWTO to use more than one independent Internet connection" document. I patched my 2.4.24 kernel with patches, described in this document. My configuration is: --------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash

Good Morning, Using Linux Mint 19.1 I have configured UFW to allow Samba. I see that ports 135 tcp, 137 udp, 138 udp , 139 tcp and 445 tcp are all set properly. The problem is that with UFW enabled I cannot connect to my Windows 8.1 PC. Error "Unable to mount location - failed to retrieve list from server, file or directory does not exist". With UFW disabled I can connect and browse

I've set up dovecot on a testbed server. Each time a user ('myusername') connects via imap, I get the following info in mail.log: dovecot: imap(myusername): fcntl(F_NOTIFY) failed: Invalid argument I'm using these config settings in dovecot.conf in an attempt to avoid fcntl lock_method = dotlock mbox_read_locks = dotlock mbox_write_locks = dotlock I've looked through the

After wrestling with Johannes's original plugin, I had a go at the mysql plugin that Tim wrote, as described here: http://members.plug.org.au/~linuxalien/dokuwiki/projects:dovecot-mysql-dspam-plugin I kept getting "Error: imap dump-capability process killed with signal 11" when attempting to start dovecot with this plugin. I traced the error to line 656 of master-settings.c in

I'm getting a 'Forbidden' when accessing dovecot.org.. Have we been rooted, or is this scheduled maintenance, or..? -Michael

I have a router used as a gateway for a small lan, I want half the machines to use one IP and half to use another IP when using SNAT to reach the internet. Both IPs are from the same ISP, same account, just different IPs. Heres what I''m trying: ------------------ LAN_IP="10.0.0.1" LAN_IFACE="eth0" EXT_IP_1="x.y.246.186" EXT_IFACE_1="eth1"

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448 Bug ID: 1448 Summary: SNAT/DNAT/Masquerading not working for UDPLite protocol Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT

What changes would I need to make if there is a 4th interface that is going to a DMZ Thanks Gene