similar to: Using smbpasswd in scripts!

At 15:58 00-04-17, you wrote: >Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:45:07 +0200 >From: werner maes <werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >To: samba@samba.org >Subject: SMBD-error: important?? >Message-ID: <38FB0753.B00F2E49@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Hello, > >When I

Hello, In my network I have a Samba Server (Domain=DN) and 3 Windows 98 WorkGroups (Net0, Net1, Net2). And my problem is: I want to avoid same users to access the workgroup Net0 (Data and Applications), and others users to the Net1. The Net2 is public for all users. It's possible to do it with a Linux Samba Server? How can I do it? Tia, Sociedade Torreense de Inform?tica, Lda. Av.

Jason Haar <Jason.Haar@trimble.co.nz> wrote: | Well I've just had a crash last night, and I've copies the log files off. | But I see nothing to suggest what happened. Also I've enabled core-dumps, | and no core dump exits, even though smbd died... | | If you look at the smb.conf file, you'll see I've put in a HUGE sleep | statement to be called via "panic

Hi James, One of the things that NT does different from WIN9x is that it attempts to 'browse' using a null session. This typically means that SAMBA is going to try to make the attachement for the 'null' username as SAMBA's guest account (by default 'nobody'). On a lot of HP systems the 'nobody' /etc/passwd entry is set as uid -2 and gid -2. These uid/gid

samba does the SMB(!) authentication against machine "a" but you MUST have equal users on ALL machines. How else should samba create files on the unix file system if there is no UNIX user to deal with? It is not a problem of samba, it's a "problem" of unix. The only trick to do this would be to create a dummy unix user and do a "force user" to this dummy on every

Hello! I used SAMBA for more than 4 years (on many different paltforms). I have problem with domain logons. The problem is: 1. On my network is one logon server (SAMBA 2.0.6 RH61) 2. I have more that +350 PC and +3500 users 3. domain logons works (they are correctly setup - on the same configuration I work in different network - no problem) 4. Problem is in them that sometimes the main SMBD

Hello! I have the two networks a.a.a.a and b.b.b.b Both on them I have domain logon server & WINS serwer How to setup than in network neightbourhood i can see form network a.a.a.a network b.b.b.b and vice versa? (a.a.a.a it is different domain than b.b.b.b) I try the option remote browse sync - it works partially - in network neightbourhood i see the domain b.b.b (from net a.a.a) but

Hello! I have use the SAMBA on the RH 62/2*i386/300 clients/1GB RAM/4000 users and found that: 1. Sometimes the main smbd dissapears (then I need restart samba - frequency daily) 2. if clients are NT and they get files (large 500MB) then they smbd can grow up to 500MB of the memory - it is sure some error in memory allocation (i use oplocks)! The samba is 2.0.7 (but 2.0.5a, 2.06 was the same

On 15/09/2019 19:08, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: > W dniu 2019-09-15 o?18:32, Rowland penny via samba pisze: >> On 15/09/2019 16:44, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: >>> I have some questions: >>> >>> I not currently understood - bind9 connected to AD server must be >>> used by the LAN workstations - or only via AD server? >>>

On 15/09/2019 20:19, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: >> What OS is this and what Samba packages did you install ? >> > [root at oceanic etc]# which ldbsearch > /usr/bin/ldbsearch > [root at oceanic etc]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/ldbsearch > ldb-tools-1.5.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > Is your DC Running Fedora ? If so, then I am sorry, but I must advise you that running a Samba AD DC

Hello, I am trying to configure pine.conf for all users and running into an issue. In this setup, Mailbox format is Maildir and Maildir location is /Mail/Username/{new,cur,..etc} First thing required in alpine was patch for maildir and this has already been done. After that I have tried setting up folder-collection Mail #md ../../Mail/username and also tried using #mc (not sure which one is

This is a common error. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Bart??omiej Solarz-Nies??uchowski via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 september 2019 14:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: ubi >> Maciej Wysocki

Does anyone test Asterisk 1.2.X + bristuff-0.3.X and TDM card? We can't get it to work. -David -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Julian J. M. Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:44 AM To: Chris Earle; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: BRI

On 16/09/2019 15:04, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Well it was worth checking.. We just dont know what you already checked.. > > Then all i can say now is, or a different OS, or try Vincent's his packages. > I see that is should support AD-DC, but I really dont know. I only do debian/ubuntu. > At least it looks like it. > > (from :

Dear List, My domain +/- works, so I try to fix rest services based on domain NT/AD.... I use WiFi authorization with PEAP/MSCHAPv2 + freeradius (before migration it works). And after migration autorization does not work. Freeradius server is on samba domain member. So i check domain connectivity: [root at see-you-later samba]# net ads testjoin Join is OK [root at see-you-later samba]#

On 19/09/2019 19:33, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski via samba wrote: > Dear List, > > After migration I have found some problems: > > 1. > > directives in /etc/samba/smb.conf > > force user > > force group You shouldn't be using those anymore, you should use Windows ACLs > > I have found similar problems like here: >

On 16/09/2019 17:26, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: > W dniu 2019-09-16 o?16:30, Rowland penny via samba pisze: >> On 16/09/2019 15:04, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >>> Well it was worth checking.. We just dont know what you already >>> checked.. > > now I setup the Ubuntu Server 18.04.3 LTS + > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/ + >

On 15/09/2019 16:44, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski wrote: > >> Done with some problems: > > 1. bugs reported here: > > https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36496 > > and here > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13060 > > involved me - but and make workarounds and migration was done. > > > Basically AD samba works. > > >

Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons listed below) that I don't expect an answer (advice is welcomed, but please read this email carefully before answering). I'm sharing this with the community with the hope that better software results from our sad experience... BACKGROUND I've been using NT for 4 years, Netware and Linux for 3 years, and Samba for almost 2. I work

W dniu 28.09.2019 o?21:29, Rowland penny via samba pisze: > On 28/09/2019 19:40, Bart?omiej Solarz-Nies?uchowski via samba wrote: >> Dear List, >> >> My domain +/- works, so I try to fix rest services based on domain >> NT/AD.... >> >> I use WiFi authorization with PEAP/MSCHAPv2 + freeradius (before >> migration it works). >> >> And after