similar to: Samba subnets

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I have a Linux box with two interfaces for the private LAN (eth0,eth1) and another one connected to the Internet. I have two subnets in my LAN (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) and eth0 and eth1 are the gateways of either subnet (192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1). I have a Samba server running in the Linux box, and this Samba server is at the same time the local master browser and a WINS server, there

I'm trying to use Samba to get access to my Unix printer. Unix System is FreeBSD-2.2-stable, and I'm running the latest port of Samba for FreeBSD-2.2-stable (Samba 2.0.0) from ftp.freebsd.org. I've checked all the references I can find on the web, and can't see the problem. Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong. Under NT (adding remote printer), I see the entry for the

Hello, i'm trying to setup a samba file server, but i need your advices. the goal of my setup is to share a folder from a linux server to windows clients (for the moment i do my tests using smbclient on linux hosts). The server and the client are on different subnets, but they can ping themselves. Samba is installed on the server (192.168.0.1/24), and smbclient is available on the

>From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> >To: tony.cheung@asiayeah.com, > Tony Yat-Tung Cheung <dragonman@asiayeah.com>, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays >Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:03:27 +0100 > >On Sunday 21 December 2003 16:31, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote: > > >>Hi All, >> >>I would

I have two subnets in may LAN 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24. Both subnets go out to the Internet through a Linux box acting as a gateway, so the gateway has one interface in each subnet (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.0.1). In both subnets I have Windows and Linux machines and I want to configure SMB networking using a workgroup (not a domain), so one workgroup for more than one subnet. I know that

Change code to use list_entry api. And removed comment suggesting that change. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

Change code to use list_entry api. And removed comment suggesting that change. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

DMA-related logic is separated from the virtqueue_add_packed(). DMA address will be saved as sg->dma_address, then virtqueue_add_packed() will use it directly. Unmap operation will be simpler. The purpose of this is to facilitate subsequent support to receive dma address mapped by drivers. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 37

I just want a simple, globally accessible directory for anyone on my LAN. I don't care who they are, who they're logged in as on their windows machine, I don't care about security (it's my own private LAN!!!). Why is this so difficult to do? I've looked through the archives (which by the way, could someone spend a few minutes and put a SEARCH feature there. Following threads

This patch adds a simple callback framework. Modified loadfile and floadfile to look for callbacks and call them if present Supports multiple callbacks Modified com32/modules/linux.c to demonstrate functionality (it's a little more complicated than it should be just to demonstrate multiple callbacks). Add progress argument to display a percentage indicator when loading. Example boot:

Dear all, I'm currently working on the automated program analysis tool AProVE (http://aprove.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/) and would like to use LLVM for analysis of C programs. I have the following example C program dealing with simple lists of integers: ------------ start C example ------------- #include<stdlib.h> struct list_el { int val; struct list_el * next; }; typedef

DMA-related logic is separated from the virtqueue_add_vring_packed() to prepare for subsequent support for premapped. DMA address will be saved as sg->dma_address, then virtqueue_add_vring_packed() will use it directly. If it is a premapped scene, the transmitted sgs should have saved DMA address in dma_address, and in virtio core, we need to pass virtqueue_map_sgs(). Signed-off-by: Xuan

David Chisnall wrote: > On 2 Oct 2012, at 03:40, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> As far as I know, this optimization is legal. Fix the test with a volatile pointer: > > Why would that be required? It isn't. My suggestion for fixing the test is to make use of the returned pointer in a fashion that the compiler is forbidden to elide it: make it an observable side-effect using

See also this proposal for the next C++ committee meeting, which aims to clarify this case and others like it: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3433.html On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I've sent this issue to some friends on the C++ committee. > > The first response I received indicates that the person thinks

Extend the guestfs_inspect_list_applications2 API call to work on Arch Linux guest images. Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@gmail.com> --- src/inspect-apps.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/inspect-apps.c b/src/inspect-apps.c index 6fb9665..8e645b7 100644 --- a/src/inspect-apps.c +++

I've sent this issue to some friends on the C++ committee. The first response I received indicates that the person thinks the optimizer is within it's rights to optimize away the call to malloc. Here are some points, extracted from the response: "There is no observable behavior (a technical term in the standard) that violates requirements of the standard. In particular, malloc in

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 03:24:16PM +0200, Nikos Skalkotos wrote: > Extend the guestfs_inspect_list_applications2 API call to work on Arch > Linux guest images. Generally looks good. I have a few minor comments inline below. But also I think we could use a test case (see tests/guests/). I don't think we'd reject the patch for not having a test case, but the test case would ensure

I've got a public share that any user is supposed to be able to access. But no matter who I try to connect as, I get the dreaded: "NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER". Important info: Samba version: 3.0.28a, OS: Kubuntu 8.04 Looking at the logs, I think the problem is here: auth/auth_util.c:create_token_from_username(1116) sid_to_uid for pcguest