similar to: Problem with smbd start in HP-UX.

Mrs, I´m a Brazilian and i don´t speak english very well, but i need try , ok . I need your help. Well, i want install the samba 2.0.7 in HP-UX 10.20. The install process is not completely ok, but install. This is the message in the install process : _______________________________________ /var/tmp/AAAa23547/catalog/samba/samba-ROOT/configure[101]: Syntax error at line 129 :

Hi folks, We're seeing an odd thing happening on about 8 out of 100 UNIX machines running Samba 1.9.18p7. Mostly on HU-UX 10.20 systems, but at least once on an IRIX 6.4 system. The scenario: - SAMBA up and running in this environment for about 2 years sharing UNIX home directories with NT boxes. - SAMBA set up to start via inetd. - Had a plant shutdown over a weekend a month ago, all

I can run nmbd successfully, but smbd dies almost immediately when I run it, the smbd.log file has the message "bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.". When I do a netstat -an | grep 139, it shows that tcp is listening on port 139. How do I resolve this conflict between tcp and smbd?

configure determines that my HP-UX 11.00 box has pread (and pwrite) because the linker resolves them to symbols in my libc. however, i don't believe that this system call is implemented in my version of the kernel because smbd dies with a SIGSYS (bad arg to sys call) in libc:pread. my workaround was to override what configure automatically determines ac_cv_func_pread=no \

"Tyler, Ross E" wrote: > configure determines that my HP-UX 11.00 box has pread (and pwrite) because the linker resolves them to symbols in my libc. > > however, i don't believe that this system call is implemented in my version of the kernel because smbd dies with a SIGSYS (bad arg > to sys call) in libc:pread. > > my workaround was to override what configure

Hello Danny Travis, I am assuming you are using generic Samba 2.2.3a version. We came across the problem and you can fix it by setting the cache variable on the devnm() system cal to 1. Just set the last parameter to the devnm() call in smbd/quotas.c to 1. ################################### # ./samba2.2/source/smbd/quotas.c # ################################### 912a913,919 > #ifdef

I have been looking at samba for about 3 days and on Unix to provide shares for our NT system. My problem is that I can't seem to start the smbd process. There are some started but by the guest user and I'm sure I need one started by the root user. If I simply type the command it returns no errors to the screen, but there are errors in the log.smb file. The error is: - standard

Hello Everyone, I have installed samba-1.9.17p4 on a linux 2.0.29 box, but the server work correctly only as a client. Testparm runs ok, but when i try to list the shares available on my server, this is the output: Added interface ip = 195.32.68.131 bcast = 195.32.68.191 nmask = 255.255.255.192 Session request failed (0,0) with myname = DNS2 destname = DNS2 Unspecified error 0x0 Your server

When I try and load smbd I get this error in the log :- bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use) Closing connections 04/02/1998 14:02:01 Server exit (caught signal) I am using Slackware 3 with Linux kernel 2.0.33, and Samba-1.9.18p4. there is no problem with Netbios naming as I can see th Linux machine in Network Neighbourhood and my samba client seems to be

Samba was working well but I changed the host allow section of smb.conf and it stopped. I changed it back and restarted and got this error message in log.smbd [2003/08/17 12:15:26, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(789) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use I have a really simple smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost

# smbd -Fi -d 2 smbd version 3.5.4-62.fc13 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 egid=0 rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[homes]" Processing section

Hi. We have had SAMBA running successfully at work here for a while, it's on a Sun Sparc Solaris 2.6. The version of samba is 2.0.0. Unfortunately our sysadmin has left the company, and I have to try and fix a problem with Samba. When I try and start samba, "nmbd" starts ok, but "smbd" doesn't start. When I check the log files, I get these errors: [2001/09/24

OS = AIX 4.3.3 Samba 2.2.8a smb.conf: [global] workgroup = METRAN [test] comment = For testing only, please path = /usr/local/samba/tmp read only = no guest ok = yes smbd fails to start but did log a pid in smbd.pid. The process is not in the process table. I ran smbd -i to display the messages: smbd version 2.2.8a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team

Hullo All I hjave a problem with SaMBa 2.2.1a with HP/UX 11.00. It seems to work fine, but after a couple hours users received a message in Windows (all 95) like that ... "There were no servers to log you into", or something like that (Win95 Brazilian Portuguese). It seems like it can't find the domain master server... Below is my smb.conf... Some help is greatly apreciated...

Hi All... While trying to start the smbd i am getting the following error message. [2004/03/22 15:01:23, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(666) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use I checked in /etc/services... Nothing is using on port # 139 Please let me know if any one has seen similar kind of problem. Thanks

Hi folks, I'm trying to help a fellow sysadmin configure Samba on his DG/UX server. He's installed 2.0.5a, and everything seemed to go well in the configure and make stages. However, when he tries to start 'smbd' by hand he gets the errors below. Our machine is binary compatible with his, and I sent him my copy of smbd (from version 2.0.3), but it made no difference. I had

Help please. I am in the process of configuring Samba 3.0.14a onto 4 AIX 5.3 systems. It seems to be working OK on 3 of the 4, but on the last one, I cannot start smbd. nmbd seems to start fine. The smb.conf file matches the other servers except that the server name is changed. Here's the error showing up on the log.smbd file. [2007/05/02 15:19:47, 0] smbd/server.c:main(835) standard

I am install Samba on a New RS/6000 M 80. I am installing Samba 2.0.7. I have the services and inedt.conf files with the needed entries and have add a program check my entry. I get the following error in the log file and can not figure out what is wrong. [2001/01/17 12:31:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(863) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)

I have upgraded samba to 2.2.7a and cannot print to my printer attached to my BSD machine. I can use the share dirs, etc, but cannot print. My log file contains: [2003/03/17 16:17:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use [2003/03/17 16:18:02, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(252) 50163099sp (204.250.145.147)

>>>>> "Marcio" == Marcio Merlone via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> writes: Marcio> Sounds a lot like my problem, which I described some days ago Marcio> here on the list, but no luck. Please report to the list if Marcio> you make any progress. Marcio, Looking at your passdb { } block, you don't have the "result_sucess = continue" option.