similar to: samba 2.0.6 and FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE (was kern/16605, 3.4-RELEASE problem)

> 1) RE: Windows 2000 > by "Alex Yu" <yua@artlover.com> 2.0.6 when compiled with crypt support (FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE) is working fine with encrypted passwords where the FreeBSD host is a domain member and I'm athenticating against the domain PDC. I had to update to 3.4-STABLE from 3.4-RELEASE to get speeds up to something similar to 3.3-RELEASE, and as of the 2/14

Synopsis: samba 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE is much faster than the same running under FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE, even after replacing the 3.4-RELEASE kernel with the 3.4-STABLE kernel. (This has been reported to FreeBSD GNATS as "kern/16605") I have 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD using the following smb.conf: [global] workgroup = <NT Domain> server string =

2.0.6pre3 compiles and installs under FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE; however, throughput from an NT 4 SP6 workstation with domain security and only TCP_NODELAY as a socket option is clocking around 200K/sec for large files (65MB). Hardware is PPro200, single CPU kernel (never have gotten 2.0.5 or later to work SMP), Adaptec 2944UW/3 Quantum 9GB Atlas II wide diff drives (clock 9MB/sec using bonnie), Intel

I am running FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE with samba 2.0.6 compiled from sources with patches taken from 2.0.5a (not the current FreeBSD port, but I'll be testing that soon with 3.4-RELEASE). The socket options file is socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=262144 SO_RCVBUF=262144 which is due to Martin Welk. Currently large files (1GB or greater)are transferring at up to 2.7MB/sec;

>From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@sls.bc.ca> >Subject: [Shorewall-users] Finally making some progress >I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive >performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, >along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the >problem *is* our firewall. We don''t

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16605 Summary: swfdec does not start multiple flash movies in a single screen in Firefox Product: swfdec Version: 0.6.6 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: low Component: plugin

hi*& ppl, what I see? smbstat shows this: veda uucp uucp 17012 vdv (193.168.6.84) Sun Dec 19 14:33:43 1999 squid-wate piv guest 19110 nlv (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20 08:51:18 1999 squid-nav paul wheel 19110 nlv (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20 08:51:42 1999 nlv nlv guest 19110 nlv (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20 09:11:31 1999

Ok, I''ve flogged this issue probably longer than some of you can stand by now. (remember, I''m the nut trying to use a PPro200 to support ~500 users on a 10Mb internet link :o) To appease those who think I''m nuts, I am ordering a new firewall shortly to allow for future growth. (probably a Dell PE750 with P4/2.8 and dual GE nics.) However, since I have yet to prove

Using the patches from -current (aa thorugh bb) samba 2.0.6 release compiles under FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE. "patch-ba" needs to be edited to change the location of the lines patched, and "patch-bb" needs to be edited to remove the first part (no longer needed) and also change the line location for the remaining part. Throughput using an NT4 SP6 P6/200 client connected at 100Mbits

Hi, After kernel panic I couldn't get gdb work properly. msi$ uname -sr FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE msi$ gdb -k /usr/src/sys/compile/MSINW/kernel.debug vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

I have just setup samba ver 3.6.23-14 on CentOS 6.6 as a member server to Windows 2008R2 ADS. Things seem to be working however looking at the log files there is an error in the log.winbindd-idmap file indicating that "idmap range not specified for domain SERVER2. My setup is as follows: Windows 2008R2 server name is "server" CentOS hostname is "server2" Domain name

I've now tried 2.0.6pre2 with a SuperMicro P6DNF dual PPro as well as the Everex StepDP/Pro dual PPro MB; same result, large (more than 1 MB) file copies usually crash with only a message about oplock errors in the logfile. Running a single CPU kernel works fine (pre2 seems much faster, but I haven't done any testing). 2.0.5a does the same. NFS and mars_nwe with the same hardware and

On 05/05/15 14:38, John Rykala wrote: > I am trying to get SAMBA working as a member server with a Windows > 2008R2 AD server, CentOS 6.6 and Samba 3.6 > > The two following commands work fine: > kinit administrator at TESTNET.LOCAL > net ads join ?U administrator > however wbinfo -u only shown local accounts > and getent passwd returns nothing. Any help would be

I've been using Samba for about 7 years of so, but have hit a hurdle I just can't seem to figure out. I want to setup samba domain member servers to be members of a samba 3.0.25 (NT4 type) domain. No windbind, LDAP, or any other of the more complex authentication mechanism. This is the same functionality going way back to Samba 2.2, or so. In fact, I successfully did this on samba

Hi! The same problem occures if 6.1-PRERELEASE kernel panic occures while configuration partition of NanoBSD is being updated (so, mounted read-write). This problem has occured now, I've got kernel panic while find(1) walked file system and the system become frozen after panic, it did not reboot. Please take a look at http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/93381 Eugene Grosbein

I am trying to get SAMBA working as a member server with a Windows 2008R2 AD server, CentOS 6.6 and Samba 3.6 The two following commands work fine: kinit administrator at TESTNET.LOCAL net ads join ?U administrator however wbinfo -u only shown local accounts and getent passwd returns nothing. Any help would be appreciated. krb5.conf [logging] default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log kdc =

I am in the process of setting up a CentOS 6.6 w/ Samba 3.6 and am getting an error "Cound not get unix ID for SID xxxxxx" Am using the same config files as I did on another similar install just changing the domain name. I was successful in joining the domain and wbinfo -u returns the list of all the users on the AD. I have installed MS Identity Management for Unix on the Server

hi*& Samba has troubles with joining to NT PDC, that has some scope id because: 1. smbpasswd does not know anything about scope id and you haven't any chance to join into NT PDC. 2. also many utils like smbmount doesn't know scope id 3. In smbclient you can specify scope id, but you should remember it and etc. It's not so usable. I'm asked about these problems in samba

hi, is a random pid generation really a security enhancement? if yes, would it make sense to setup something like: --> sysctl kern.randompid=`jot -r 1 500 2000` in cron to be executed every X mins/hrs? and finally, what are the recommended minimum (security) and maximum (performance) values for kern.randompid?