similar to: SAMBA digest 2231

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "SAMBA digest 2231"

1999 Jul 09
3
Virus checking
We are using samba to give our NT users access to our UNIX servers (running Solaris 2.5.1) and to give our UNIX users, using Wincenter, access to their UNIX directories. We want to be able to run a virus checker (Network Associates VirusScan) from a NT 4.0 workstation and have it check the samba (UNIX directories). Since we want to centralize this activity, I want to be"root" on the
2018 Oct 03
3
2038 year Problem
On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of money to tend systems over new year's eve/day. I was working for an ISP at the time and got none of this. Nothing happened. I don't even recall
1999 Mar 30
2
Y2K compliance of R
Hi, I was thinking to ask the University computing Labs here to install R and I was told they need a statement that the software (R) is Y2K compliant. Which I cannot find in CRAN. (in addition to the licensing info). Is it a big issue to put such a statement in R? or this has legal implications that R do not want as a "free" software? If possible I would like to see the statement on
2020 Aug 30
5
Meson build
Hi, Just a heads up on my experiences with the new build system. Arch Linux meson-0.55.1 Overall, it looks good, so well done! Just a couple of minor things I noted: 1. Arch uses a meson wrapper script (arch-meson) that sets:   --buildtype plain This seems to trigger a bug in meson that results in copious bogus compiler warnings: cc1: warning: ‘-Wformat-y2k’ ignored without ‘-Wformat’
2020 Sep 01
2
Re: Meson build
On a Tuesday in 2020, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Toolybird wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just a heads up on my experiences with the new build system. >> >> Arch Linux >> meson-0.55.1 >> >> Overall, it looks good, so well done! >> >> Just a couple of minor things I noted: >> >> 1. Arch uses a meson
1998 Jul 02
1
redirector timeout (actually sun y2k)
Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.
2020 Sep 01
2
Re: Meson build
On a Tuesday in 2020, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:13:39PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: >> On a Tuesday in 2020, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Toolybird wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Just a heads up on my experiences with the new build system. >> > > >> > > Arch Linux
1999 Sep 07
2
weird printing problems.
I'm experiencing some weird printing problems with samba connected printers. When I'll bring up a 95/98 workstation, sometimes it will say that the printer is offline, when it clearly isn't, or it will see everything fine, but it simply won't print. These are remote lpd connected printer to the samba server, and lpd can print fine. These are JetDirect HP printers. Any
2000 Jan 26
1
NT4 RPC error browsing [homes]
I brought this up some time ago at comp.protcols.smb, which showed that others have run into the same problem, but so far I haven't found a solution anywhere. The problem is that since Y2K, I haven't been able to browse the auto homes share [homes] with Win NT4 (details below). Does anybody have any idea what the cause of this problem is, and better yet, how to fix it? Thanks, -- Alex
2005 Nov 10
2
Xen 3.0 User''s Manual
Hello all. I''m the tech writer at XenSource, Inc., and I''ve been asked to ride herd on getting the revised Xen 3.0 User''s Manual put together, reviewed, etc. We are targeting a review draft for 11/21 and it would be great if any significant additions or changes that any contributers might be making could get checked in before then so the review process can be as
2013 Nov 20
1
[releng_10 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the
2017 Dec 11
3
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
On 11/12/17 10:22, Thibaut Perrin wrote: > Hello Fabien, > > First, thank you for even trying for what seems to be an impossible task :( > > Quick points :? > - if it was decided not to continue, what would happen to the current > wiki ? Dismantled or would it remain as read-only for documentation > purpose ? > - What about Sphinx
2012 Jul 24
1
9-STABLE (238719) compilation fails on i386
Hi all. When building procstat I get this: clang -O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs
2011 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] Live code elimination problem in code generation
Hello. :) I've met a problem that eliminates a live code in code generation phase. The initially generated code is shown as follows (as a pseudo code): ( Before pseudo-code expansion. ) ---------- loop: : : set P0 <- xxx ( P0: a physical register for a parameter of function F ) set P1 <- yyy ( P1: a physical register for a parameter of function F ) SELECT_CC z1, z2, z3, ...
2003 Sep 04
2
error handling in R/ lapack routines
Does any of you know where I can find an explanation of lapack errors codes? I get error code 17 when using optim(). Is there a way to handle errors in R such that depending on the type of error I can decide what to do next? Thanks, Haky
2011 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Branch transformation with branch-weight metadata
Hello :) I am looking around __builtin_expect() directive for optimization. ( http://llvm.org/docs/BranchWeightMetadata.html ) Since it is not included in v2.9, I am searching about it on svn trunk. I found that the lowering phase generates branch-weight metadata node for that directive. However, I can't find any code related to the metadata even in the branch transformation code. IMHO, in
2002 Aug 23
2
R 1.5.1 not working with Windows NT on Virtual PC 4 (PR#1932)
Full_Name: Alexandre Da Costa Version: 1.5.1 OS: Windows NT 4 on Virtual PC 4 Submission from: (NULL) (193.253.191.74) I am using Virtual PC 4.0.2 for every day work. I wanted to try connections of R 1.5.1 to Oracle DataBases. But R is running but is not working at all ! The simple commands end with "no finite arguments" error. See following session:
2007 Apr 18
3
RE: OT (a little): IPV6 Ramifications Article
Hi guys, I know it's a little off topic but......Wondering if you can help. My wife has been asked to find a writer to produce a story on "The dramatic ramifications of IPV6 on commercial businesses and how it will change the product designs for ordinary household/commercial use in a 5-10 year time frame" So her company hired someone who should have been able to deliver the
2011 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] Live code elimination problem in code generation
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Hae-woo Park wrote: > I've met a problem that eliminates a live code in code generation phase. > > The initially generated code is shown as follows (as a pseudo code): > ( Before pseudo-code expansion. ) > > ---------- > loop: > : > : > set P0 <- xxx ( P0: a physical register for a parameter of function F ) > set P1
2002 Feb 19
1
Typo fix for samba 2.2.3a source/smbd/trans2.c
Just a couple of quick fixes for trans2.c and README in samba-2.2.3a. --- source/smbd/trans2.c.old Tue Feb 5 14:37:55 2002 +++ source/smbd/trans2.c Wed Feb 20 10:26:16 2002 @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ if(!S_ISLNK(sbuf.st_mode)) return(UNIXERROR(ERRSRV,ERRbadlink)); #else - return(UNIXERROR(ERRDOS,ErrNotALink)); +