similar to: Sun Solaris Install

I was very excited when I ran across the "UNIX password sync" directive in the smb.conf!!! THAT would be convenient and really add to the making the server seamless!! Unfortunately I haven't been able to get the unix and smbpasswords to sync from changing within win95. The posts I've seen in the mailing list concerning sync have so far gone unanswered :-( I'm just looking

Hello! I installed Samba2.0.3 on redhat linux5.1/kernel2.2.1. When I type http://127.0.0.1:901 in Netscape, the swat login dialog appears. But eachtime I input root and root's passwd, it tells me authorization failed. who can help me? thanks! Kai Kang -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Just wondering if there is a way to get drive namings to change according to who's logged into the network. ie. 'bob' logs into windows networking and gets... E: 'bob' on server kiwi. Now if 'sue' logs into windows networking on the same pc she gets... E: 'bob' on server kiwi. But E: contains sue's stuff. So is there a way into making 'sue'

Ok, I've tracked down the problem I've had bootstrapping llvm-gcc. The culprit is in TreeToLLVM::EmitMemCpy: void TreeToLLVM::EmitMemCpy(Value *DestPtr, Value *SrcPtr, Value *Size, unsigned Align) { const Type *SBP = PointerType::get(Type::Int8Ty); const Type *IntPtr = TD.getIntPtrType(); Value *Ops[4] = { CastToType(Instruction::BitCast,

Hi, I am trying to write a LowerCALL() function for my (custom) target ISA. All I need to do is map a CALL instruction directly onto an SDNode that takes an equal number of arguments (very much alike intrinsics, except that these are custom to my target.) I do not need to implement any call sequences, stack frames etc. I get the following assertion failure: llc: LegalizeDAG.cpp:834:

Hello, This patch fixes bug 4882. Regards -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4882.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6856 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090907/266f900c/attachment.obj>

Hi Evan, On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:17 -0800, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hi Nickhil, > > The Legalizer expects lower'd call is the node that produce the same > number of values as the non-lowered node. That's what the assertion > is checking. > > Take a look at the LowerCall routine for any other targets. You will > see that in the non-void function case, it

Evening, I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) { string foo = "foo"; string bar = "barr"; Type *charTy = Type::getInt8Ty(block->getContext()); ArrayType *s1Ty =

Hello All I have looking for any specific answer for one thing. I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN). To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is there a chance to run DHCP server on eth0:0 interface? Or it is impossible ? Thanks in advance. -- /Best Regards *Greg*/ UML Professional (Cert #251574932)

Hi Nickhil, The Legalizer expects lower'd call is the node that produce the same number of values as the non-lowered node. That's what the assertion is checking. Take a look at the LowerCall routine for any other targets. You will see that in the non-void function case, it returns a MERGE_VALUES, i.e. all the results merged along with the chain. Cheers, Evan On Nov 15, 2006, at

Hi Jakub, looks good. > + LLVMContext *Context = &SI->getContext(); I guess this could be LLVMContext &Context = SI->getContext(); which means you can use Context rather than *Context below. > - const Type *Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(SI->getContext()); > - MemSetF = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::memset, &Ty, 1); > + const Type *Tys[] =

On Sep 7, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jakub, looks good. > >> + LLVMContext *Context = &SI->getContext(); > > I guess this could be > LLVMContext &Context = SI->getContext(); > which means you can use Context rather than *Context below. Right, C bad habit ;) Fixed. >> - const Type *Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(SI->getContext());

Hi, I've been handed the administration of our Solaris 2.5.1 Server and have recently upgraded to Samba 2.0.5a. As the server is in a predominantly NTsp3 environment it was requested that when the NT passwords change (each month) the Unix Passwords should also change. All the NT and Win95 Clients are currently authenticating using Plain Text Passwords. Also the current security level is

I have a MS Exchange server. I'd like to install a samba server for the users. Does someone know if MS Exchange can validate users in samba ? -- ^-^,-----. mailto:frankie@etsetb.upc.es o o ) http://www.etsetb.upc.es/~frankie Y (_ (__(OOOo

Dear all We have sambe 2.0.0 we cant use 2.0.4b(clearcase problem with this version) on hpux 10.20 a user changed their password from a 8 character password to a 9 character password. They now can not use theie samba share unless they only type the first 8 letters of the 9 letter password Any ideas ??? Andrew Welham

Greetings, Does anyone have any experience of how to perform a samba password syncronization with hpux 10.20 trusted system? Question number(2) how does run generate a smbpasswd file on hpux trusted system? Please advise, currently stuck and sinking.

Hello! I have Samba 2.0.0 installed on an UltraSPARC server (Solaris 2.6, NIS). I only use Samba for file and printer sharing (I have about 15 Win-clients). My smb.conf is minimal. Everything works fine. Now I want 5 more Win98-clients to use the Samba shares. However, these are on a different subnet. When I try 'net view \\myserver' on one of these boxes I get: Error 51: The

Andrew Ruef wrote: > Evening, > > I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the > llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, > i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. > > void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) > { > string foo = "foo"; > string bar = "barr"; > > Type

Hi, I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. It was so : Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::memset,&Tys,1); Now, it's

Samba Techs, I started compiling 2.0.5a yesterday and someone came by and told me I could get a version of samba that has already been compiled. The problem is, I don't know where to find it. Is there any way someone could please send me a copy of one of the most recent "compiled" versions of samba. If not, could you please direct me to the location on the internet where I can