similar to: File timestamp different between SAMBA server and SAMBA client!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "File timestamp different between SAMBA server and SAMBA client!"

1999 May 25
0
unable to log on to server/SAMBA Digest 2101
> From: "Stephen L Arnold" <sarnold@coyote.rain.org> > > On 22 May 99, <khoogc@singnet.com.sg> had questions about unable to > log on to server: > > > 2. Server is a RH5.2 with shadow passwd and samba-2.0.3 and has the line > > > > 192.168.0.1 orchid.khoo.lgl orchid > > > > in /etc/hosts > > Does the RH box connect
2003 Oct 12
2
INFO method and DTMF translation
Hello guys, I have searched high and low, but not found any information about rules of using DTMF in SIP INFO method. Cisco has described something with Signal=, but it look like this feature is dependent on implementors? The problem is chan_sip.c cannot correctly translate received DTMF digits, especially #,*. At least with my Antek EGW-804 gateway. Looking into chan_sip.c, I found this code:
2004 Apr 17
3
Couldnot open MS power point from Samba share
Hi every one, i have the problem opening MS Powerpoint 97 from samba share. the ms ppt always shows: <file name> is not correct where the file name is manged. i tried to disable manged name in samba, but the problem still happens thank you for advice. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
1999 Jan 28
0
win95 & NT4 concurent access to paradox database
Hi, I use samba for one year only, but with full satisfaction. Only with latest cvs tree I discovered some (maybe particular) problem. In mixed environment of win95oemII and NT4 workst (sp3 or sp4) we share some Paradox 7.0 database on linux server (Rh5.2 and 2.2.0-pre1 kernel). Paradox controls multiuser access to the data with three files: PDOXUSRS.NET (user names etc?), and two lock files,
2017 Mar 14
0
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
Rsh should be pretty easy to do. I don't think it has changed since before RH5.2 vintage. Otherwise, your best bet would be NFS. I think RH5.2 is new enough for NFSv3 but I don't remember for sure. Alternatively maybe you know someone with a newer SCSI controller. I have several PCI ones and even a PCI-X one I haven't used in years. On 03/14/2017 12:30 AM, Philip Rhoades via
1999 Apr 04
0
(Fwd) Samba and win9x woes
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- From: Self <scc> To: vanlug@gweep.bc.ca Subject: Samba and win9x woes Send reply to: help@pdscc.com Date sent: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 01:45:09 -0800 Okay was with a client tonight setting up and edge router http://edge.fireplug.net and samba stuff and had a few problems. Samba is the stock one with RH5.2 (1.9.18
1998 Dec 16
2
NT domains and 1.9.18pSomething
Hi, I'm trying to replace an NT SBS box with a RH5.2 box, and things are proceeding quite well, save a few samba troubles. I've found that the NT4WS (SP4) clients can log in if told to use a samba machine as a "workgroup", but that they can not find a domain controller if told to use "domain" logons. (They have the registry password encryption hack installed.)
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I get the following message Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171 and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the line 1589 and it works.
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I get the following message Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171 and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the line 1589 and it works.
1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine (and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under 0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux installations. I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q or rpm
1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine (and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under 0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux installations. I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q or rpm
1999 May 11
1
model.matrix crashes (PR#189)
With 0.64.1 on Intel RH5.2, abc <- list() abc$abc$abc <- matrix(1:20) mt <- terms(~(abc$abc$abc[,1]==64)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==65)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==75) |(abc$abc$abc[,1]==84)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==85)) model.matrix(mt,model.frame(mt)) crashes. With ab$ab$ab, it does not. Apparently, the bug I reported for 0.64.0 has just been pushed back one step. Jim
1999 Nov 29
1
rbind crash (PR#351)
Well here is my (first) segmentation fault for this version (R0.90.0) on Intel RH5.2: x <- matrix(0,nrow=1,ncol=3) y <- c(0.1,10,0.01) rbind(x,y) Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the
1999 Dec 17
1
lists of functions (PR#377)
The following works: list(function() 1, function() 2) but this does not: z <- list() zz[[1]] <- function() 1 giving an "incompatible types" error. The second procedure works with other types of objects. Intel RH5.2 with R90.1. Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read
1999 Nov 24
2
scan error (PR#342)
It seems to me the following should work (in fact, it comes from someone's SPlus file). Instead, it reads the first 8 lines and then spits out syntax errors. Using nlines=36 works. Using nmax does not. Intel RH5.2 with R90.0. Debugging shows it must be internal. Jim junk <- scan(file="",list(i=0,r1=0,r2=0,lull="",day=""),n=5*36) 1 3 5 no 1 2 1
2000 Jan 25
1
core dump involving function closure (PR#402)
A user has crashed R90.1 on MS Windows by succesive calls to two of my formula/function interpretors in an order that I had not foreseen. I have checked and this also occurs with Intel RH5.2. I have distilled the problem down to its bare bones as the following set of instructions: func <- function(.mu){ .ch1 <- deparse(.mu,width=500)[-1] .fn <-
1999 Nov 16
3
Inf in expression (PR#326)
I was getting worried. 0.65 is the first version that I had not been able to crash. Well the following gives a seg fault on Intel RH5.2 with R0.65.1: plot(rnorm(20),xlab=expression(mu[Inf])) You can guess what I was trying to do, as I used infty first and that did not work. (I now know the correct formula.) Jim -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
2017 Mar 14
4
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
People, This doesn't seem possible - would it be possible to hack a version of rsync to do it? As an exercise, I want to create a VM image (or at least backup of all the files with rsync) from a SCSI drive in an old Red Hat (NOT Enterprise) v5.2 Linux 486 machine (circa 1999 that does have rsync on it but it has protocol problems talking my server). The 486 has: - an ISA Adaptec 1542
2004 Apr 16
1
Another domain browse problem
Hi. We have two networks, one on Windows 2000 and another in SAMBA. I can browse the windows domain but they can't. They don't even see the domain. My smb.conf includes Domain master = Yes Preferred master = Yes Domain logons = Yes Does windows domain need to have a well working dns server? Cheers, Rafael
1999 Jan 12
4
RH5.2 bundle
Hello and Happy New R Two points: 1 Noting the existence of 0.63.2 as a tgz file on CRAN, but being careful or lazy depending on how you want to see it, I also note that the binaries for Redhat stop at 0.63.1 on RH 5.1. I recently got the RH 5.2 Power Tools where I was pleased to see R 0.62.4 included, lots of libraries including V&R. This had been compiled into an rpm - does anyone know