similar to: Fw: couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/status.lck

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Fw: couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/status.lck"

2001 Jan 16
0
Couldn't open status file /var/adm/slh/samba/locks/STATUS..LCK
Every thing works fine but... Samba 1.9.18 using default (oplocks = True) $ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus -d No path in service weight4 - using /tmp No path in service lj4d - using /tmp No path in service lj3si - using /tmp No path in service lj4si - using /tmp No path in service lyle4 - using /tmp No path in service steve4 - using /tmp No path in service lp - using /tmp No path in service lp2
2001 Jan 17
0
Couldn't open status file /var/adm/slh/samba/locks/STATUS..LC K
Gunnar, Check (ll -d dirname) to make sure that there is at least x permission for everyone in each directory down the /var/adm/slh/samba/locks path; also, does the STATUS..LCK file exist in the named directory, and if so what are the permissions on it? Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Bakken, Gunnar [mailto:bakkengj@mail.slh.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:08 PM
1998 Apr 27
2
STATUS..LCK
what is the format of this file? what is the best way to access it w/o the smbstatus program? IE: with perl -sv
2001 Feb 08
1
status...lck
when I do an smbstatus iget: couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/status/STATUS..LCK why can't it? why can't I? thanks
2001 Nov 09
0
FW: Samba on Win2K
After I made the following changes to get my Win2k machine to be able to mount my Unix disk, now my Win95 machine is not able to mount the Unix disk (using 'map network drive'). It asks me for a password but says the password is invalid, it is the same password that is used on the Win95 and Unix machines... help > -----Original Message----- > From: Barker, Brian W. > Sent:
2005 Jun 01
0
samba on solaris 2.8 not creating STATUS..LCK file
for the last two nights one of your trucks is parked in a residential area. the unit number is 342995 tagged in oklahoma tag number 2CZ487. In the state of maryland it is against the law to park in a residential area. we are short on parking space in the first place we hope that you can correct this problem. thank you, J. K. Hudson Jr.
2003 Mar 10
0
Fw: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (reposted)
Hi Peter, i had a long, frunstrating web surfing yesterday night, searching for something that could apply to your case. I didn't find much at all, sorry. The only thing perhaps interesting to you could be this: http://us2.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/htmldocs/printer_driver2.html This doc contains a section about migrating from 2.0.x to 2.2.x I think the problem lyes in the new way samba
2014 Mar 12
0
"could not open file /var/lock/samba/unexpected.tdb"
Hi I have a Samba problem on an AIX server: We are running SAMBA version 3.2.0 In the log.nmbd file I have the following entry: tdb(/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8060928 can I do a "> unexpected.tdb" to remove the contents of this file without having to stop Samba? Kind regards Johndavid Metcalf CAD and Warehouse Systems PP-COP department,IS
1998 Aug 24
1
Can't connect, even to myself
I have a two-node home network: a Linux machine (RH 5.0, samba-1.9.17p4-3.rpm, also running bind as authoritative for my home domain) and Win 95 with Client for MS Net & File & Print sharing. Linux = calvin.home = 10.5.1.1. Win95 = hodge.home = 10.5.1.10. Calvin is the default gateway for the Win95 box, since I often connect via PPP to the Internet, and I've set up IP
2002 Feb 13
0
"could not open file /var/lock/samba/unexpected.tdb"
When I start winbindd (Samba v2.2.3a on Linux), I get the entries in log.winbindd shown below. What's the story on all those complaints about file "unexpected.tdb"? There is no general problem with Samba writing to that subdirectory: # ll /var/lock/samba/ total 288 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 696 Feb 12 22:01 brlock.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 231 Feb 13
2006 May 03
2
Is it safe to delete ferret-write.lck if it is stale?
I''m noticing that ferret-write.lck sometimes stays in my index directory and throws exceptions whenever someone tries to do a search. Apparently there are some cases where ferret doesn''t realize that the file is old and can be deleted. I''m wondering what the best way to recover from this error is. Am I safe just writing a cron job that deletes this file if it is over
1999 Apr 06
0
FW: Printing Problem with Samba running on Solaris 2.5.1
Hello all, I am still expecting someone to help with this problem Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Olusanya, Olukunle O > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 8:13 AM > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: Printing Problem with Samba running on Solaris 2.5.1 > > Hello, > > Until 2 weeks ago, Samba 1.9.18 running on my Solaris 2.5.1 system was > working
1998 Nov 02
0
Fw: SAMBA digest 1861
There was an interruption in mail service and your memo was not sent. Please re-send your message. Thank-you -----Original Message----- From: samba@samba.anu.edu.au <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> To: Multiple recipients of list <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 1:24 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 1861 > SAMBA Digest 1861 > >For information on unsubscribing
2008 Feb 22
3
FW: [PATCH][UPDATE]Remove lock on guest table walk
Is there any trouble with mailing list? I didn''t see my mail sent back after almost 8hrs. :-( Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Tian, Kevin Sent: 2008年2月22日 10:33 To: ''Tim Deegan'' Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: [PATCH][UPDATE]Remove lock on guest table walk >From: Tim Deegan >Sent: 2008年2月21日 22:13 >Hi, > >So, the idea seems
1999 Jan 28
0
win95 & NT4 concurent access to paradox database
Hi, I use samba for one year only, but with full satisfaction. Only with latest cvs tree I discovered some (maybe particular) problem. In mixed environment of win95oemII and NT4 workst (sp3 or sp4) we share some Paradox 7.0 database on linux server (Rh5.2 and 2.2.0-pre1 kernel). Paradox controls multiuser access to the data with three files: PDOXUSRS.NET (user names etc?), and two lock files,
2003 Apr 14
1
FW: Re: Open ports
------- BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE ------- From: g.pardon@pi.be To: teastep@shorewall.net Cc: Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Open ports How am I testing this? I''m doing a portscan using a portscanner like GFI Languard, Superscanner and nmap to check. Those two TCP-ports always showed up. Although, I think there are other to test it. I read the FAQ and the phenomenon (where is that
2006 Jul 31
1
Fw: Files left open
I'm still stuggling with files left open. My app is a Dialogic application on a Win2K box. The host is running AIX 5.1 ML2 and samba 3.0.23a. Whenever my PC app speaks a prompt stored on the AIX box, the file stays open. smbstatus, fuser and lsof all agree the file is open. All other apps that I've tried, Winzip, pkzip, vi, etc., behave properly. I just can't believe this is a
2003 Feb 03
0
FW: unable to open connection
Thanks to Brian D. Ripley and Uwe Ligges. It works now. Zhu Wang Statistical Science Department Southern Methodist University 3225 Daniel Avenue, Heroy 123 Dallas, TX 75275 Tel: (214)768-2453 Fax: (214)768-4035 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de] > > Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:22 AM >
2008 May 05
0
FW: [Red5] Open-source SIP phone with Red5 and Flex3
Thought this might also interest some people on the asterisk list as well. http://www.igniterealtime.org/community/blogs/ignite/2008/05/05/flashbas ed-audio-in-openfire-part-ii Cheers, Dean > -----Original Message----- > From: red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:red5-bounces at osflash.org] On Behalf Of > Dele Olajide > Sent: Monday, 5 May 2008 11:22 AM > To: red5 at
2016 Jul 03
2
FW: quota-status service
If you need fast and timely support you can contact OX sales for an support agreement . It is somewhat impolite to except such from a public mailing list over weekend. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Michael Fox <news at mefox.org> Date: 03/07/2016 09:00 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: FW: quota-status service ???