similar to: Creating new folder in a WIN95 explorer czech version.

hi, Has anyone encountered problems running virus checkers on NT4+sp3 clients against Samba served drives ? We recently upgraded a samba server to 1.9.18p10 and now have an intermittent problem where during the scan of Samba drive the virus check flakes out with the error; "Network Name was deleted" I'm told that the server still appears to be browsable after this error, and the

I had given NIS access to the Windows NT domain users via Samba 1.9.18p3. The Samba gateway worked great when the users on the NT domain had the same username & password on both the NT PDC as well as the NIS. I have now set up Samba 1.9.18.p4 with server security & password sync turned on. The server specified is my NT PDC. Users get full access to the NIS & the NT with single logon

SUBJECT: SAMBA digest 1700 ERROR: Text size exceeds maximum

Here is a current listing of the parameters that can be changed by SWAT in each of the 3 pages. A "no" means it does not appear in that page. "BASIC" means it shows in the basic view. "ADVANCED" means it only shows in the advanced view (unless its value is non default, in which case it shows in the basic view as well). Do people think this is the right settings for

Hello, I am trying to figure out how to use optimize() with array variables as inputs. I have a for loop in the function definition: SS <- function(int,slo,x,y){ for(i in 1:length(x)) ((int+slo*x[i])-y[i])^2->squares[i] sum(squares)->>sum_squares output_txt = c ("The sum of squares is", sum_squares) print(output_txt, quote=FALSE)} Even assuming I make x and y

Dear List: I am running into a memory issue that I haven't noticed before. I am running a simulation with all of the code used below. I have increased my memory to 712mb and have a total of 1 gb on my machine. What appears to be happening is I run a simulation where I create 1,000 datasets with a sample size of 100. I then run each dataset through a gls and obtain some estimates. This works

Hello Listers, does anyone know about virus scanners working on Unix hosts but scanning for all those bad vermin from the M$ world. Best solution (for me) would be a tight coupling with samba, monitoring the I/O as some PC scanners do. Any suggestions? TIA, -- Detlef ////

Hi, While testing the upgrade from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7 I found some kind of misbehaviour of inherit permissions. It was already known that the SGID bit on directories is only useable with "inherit permissions = yes". Most of my shares depend heavily on this (unix) feature. Today I found out I cannot change a file attribute to read-only from NT while "inherit permissions" is set

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi NG, i have samba-2.2.8a-1 on a RedHat 8.0 box. It's Domain Member of an NT4 Domain. I got no problems joining the Domain with "smbpasswd -j <DOMAIN> -r <PDC> -U <User> and i see it in the network neighborhood of any Win2k Client. But if i take a look into the logfile i

Hello, Listers I'm trying to run blloean logit model with R. My code is: > library(boolean) > library(foreign) > pr <- read.dta ("prcore1.dta") > bp <- boolprep ("(a&b)|c", "cwt", a="O1", b="t", c="DM2 > + ah + md + con + n3 + rel + slo + pyrs > + sp1 + sp2 + spl3") > answer <- boolean (bp, link =

How can I set the sticky bit on new directories via share definition ? (samba 2.0.6) This doesn't work: [share] .... directory mode = 1777 ^ Any idea? Best Regards Markus Koelle mkoelle@gmx.de

I've set "force directory mode = 1775" in smb.conf, but when I make directories in a share through network neighborhood, I end up with 0775, i.e. user has rwx, group rwx, others rx. The sticky bit is not getting set. What am I doing wrong? thanks in advance, Ed Schernau ed@schernau.com Network Architect

I want to bubble out of this discussion, because most of the conversation has been about merit of various tools, how much the cloud license costs, etc. In my opinion, none of this actually matters. There are much larger strategic questions that we should be talking about instead: 1) Why is LLVM special? We are a tiny community compared to the larger GitHub community - anything that makes us

Compiling package methods, R-1.5.0, on Solaris 5.7 failed (output below) for me with - gcc-2.95.3, perl-5.005_03 and also - gcc-3.0.4, perl-5.6.1 Any ideas a) what the problem is or even better b) how to solve it? Uwe Ligges =================================== [...] building package 'methods' ../../../library/methods/man/methods.Rd is unchanged making do_substitute_direct.d from

Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made this observation? My log entries are below Thanks in advance!!!! Greg Ennis

Hello, this could be issue with firewall or netfilter on bridge S pozdravem Kristi?n Feldsam Tel.: +420 773 303 353 E-mail.: admin at feldhost.cz www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost poskytuje kvalitn? hostingov? a serverov? slu?by za p??znivou cenu. FELDSAM s.r.o. V rohu 434/3 Praha 4 ? Libu?, PS? 142 00 I?: 290 60 958, DI?: CZ290 60 958 C 200350 veden? u M?stsk?ho soudu v Praze Banka: Fio banka a.s.

I compiled and tried rsync 2.5.0 but could not get the server running. loadparm.c:string_set() now calls free() which it did not do in 2.4.6 and this free() tries to free memory that was not allocated with malloc. Here is a gdb run (done after adding return before fork() in become_daemon) which shows where it crashes and what my minimal config file for demonstrating the bug was. The config file

Dear Samba support team, I have a question on Samba 3.5.8 please, which is not solved by searching the forums. I tried all suggested solutions, but nothing take effect. Situation: - small public school - We have Ubuntu Server 11.04 64-bit - Samba 3.5.8 as PDC - Windows XP and Windows 7 Pro SP1 clients - On Windows XP everything works. Login is quick and reliable there. Problem: But

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 23.07.2015 um 18:06 schrieb "Valeri Galtsev" > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>: >> >> On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> The main reason actually is chronological order. But not just for the >>> reply .. but for IN-LINE posting. >>> >>> In a discussion where you need to

Hello Timo and everyone, I think on such an idea that may save me a bit of space and time: in my company we have a mailbox that holds a copy of every message that our SMTP processed. While it eats a lot of space, it saved us several times when, you may imaging, user "suddenly" deleted the most important message in his life and call our IT guys for help. The mailbox contains