similar to: password stuff

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "password stuff"

1998 Dec 01
2
samba blamed for network problems (help!)
Howdy folks: Hi. It's me again. I've posted before about browsing problems, etc. Here's the setup: An isolated LAN (most clients have modems for dialling out) with one linux/samba machine (RedHat 4.2, kernel 2.0.30, samba 1.9.18p8) and ~20 win95 (OSR/2.1) clients. We used to have Netware 4.11 until the new PC/lan guy decided we didn't it any more (our old server now runs
1998 Dec 29
0
mapped drives do not appear
When the world was young, Scott Gasch carved some runes like this: > I am having trouble with samba (version 2.0beta4) and I thought > someone might have seen this before. From client PCs (win98 > and winnt 4.0) I am able to see my samba server in net hood. I > am able to browse the shared filesystems. I am able to map > drives. However, when a network drive is mapped to a
1999 Jan 21
3
Windoze Printer and Linux Box Setup Woes
Okay... seems I still cannot get anything working right with this as far getting it to print. Here is the three different files which I would like all to look at and see what I have screwed up since it refuses to print. Here is the setup of the network: HP 5L connected to Win95 - 192.168.0.1 Linux - Zeus - 192.168.0.3 -----------SMB.CONF FILE------------ ; /etc/smb.conf [global] printing =
1999 Jan 04
0
SAMBA digest 1925
samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1925 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) UNIX to PC > by Shaun Lennox <shaun@countyfair.co.za> > 2) Connect to exported filesystem from NT via a net use cmd > by "Xia Tian"
1998 Nov 17
1
WINS problem
Greetings Earthlings: I finally convinced the LAN guy to remove NetBlooie from our windoze clients. I also made the samba box the local and master browser (we have no NT boxes at the moment). Local browsing seems to have gotten faster (at least Mr. Robinson's Network Neighborhood resolves faster). However, our LAN is isolated (windoze clients dial out to get to the internet, retrieve
1998 Jul 24
2
Slowdown when copying large files
I am currently investigating using samba on a Linux box to provide file server services on our NT LAN (I'm a bit sick of NT doing dummy spits on me). I'm running RH5.1, and have just upgraded samba to samba-1.9.18p8-51.3 (using the rpm from http://samba.anu.edu.au/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/5.1/samba- 1.9.18p8-51.3.i386.rpm) The setup includes several NT servers, one set up as
1998 Dec 16
1
Once more into the breech (browsing problems)
Howdy all: I thought I had this problem beaten into submission, but I guess not. We just got our first NT box, which is another new wrinkle... Anyway, the LAN just went belly-up again yesterday, and when the LAN guy disconnected my linux/samba box from the network, Network Neighborhood came right back. I still don't think it's a linux/samba problem, but I'm certainly no
1998 Aug 24
0
SAMBA digest 1789
When the world was young, Eric Melville carved some runes like this: > From: Eric Melville <m_thrope@rigelnet.ml.org> > Subject: passwords > > could someone please give me the lowdown on samba and passwords? i keep > trying to connect to any share name on either of my unix boxes, either > from each other or from a win95 machine... every time i can't get anything >
1999 Jul 26
2
SAMBA digest 2177
At 16:58 23/07/99 +1000, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2177 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) rookie needs help > by "Page, Jon T" <Jon.Page@pnl.gov> > 2) genrand.c > by Mark_Noel@cch.com > 3) Wincenter 3.1.13/Winframe 1.7 - ACLs: > by Hanns-Peter Ermert
1998 Aug 18
1
PAM authentication failure?
Howdy: Can anybody explain why /var/log/messages is filled with the following? Aug 18 09:37:53 rama PAM_pwdb[28483]: 1 authentication failure; (uid=0) -> arnold for samba service Aug 18 09:38:25 rama PAM_pwdb[28494]: (login) session opened for user arnold by arnold(uid=0) The first one happens every time I browse to rama from win95 Explorer; the second one is from a telnet login
1999 Jul 20
7
too many open files
Please answer if anybody has solved this problem: [1999/07/19 20:59:41, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. Thanks in advance.
1998 Aug 13
1
DNS instead of WINS
I have not found any Samba documentation explaining using DNS for name resolution. We are running a name server on the network which was set up for several reasons. I find our DNS server is faster, more reliable and doesn't generate mangled machine names like our NT WINS server, which can't be edited. This doesn't happen with DNS since the names are all entered statically. We have
1998 Jul 13
0
win95 client problems (registry limitation?)
Howdy: I'm new to this samba stuff, but I've run across a problem that doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. It seems that OSR/2 clients (with all the M$ system updates; I already added the EnableClearTextPassword key) that have had their TCP/IP settings tweaked in the registry (eg, MaxMTU=576, TTL=32, RWIN added, etc) for DUN connections have mucho problems with a samba
2000 May 25
2
smbmount questions
Howdy all: I'm trying to use smbmount to mount a win9x share and copy some files for backup, eventually to run as a script invoked via cron. I have RH6.1/samba 2.0.5a, and the windoze box is win95b. If I do the standard mount (smbmount //winbox/backup /mnt/smb04) I have to be root. Also, after it's mounted, I can't create any files there as a normal user (even though the
1999 Jan 21
4
HPUX 9.05 & Samba 2.0.0 & problems !
Hi there ! I just upgraded (last friday night) our main Samba host to Samba 2.0.0 from version 1.9.18p10. This host provides access to our own file based database system. The number of Samba clients is around 60 (nearly all NT4.0's and few NT3.51's). The Samba 2.0.0 host runs 'uname -a': HP-UX vertex A.09.05 A 9000/720 65914162 two-user license After the upgrade change I've
1998 Nov 24
0
Dial in accounts (1883)
When the world was young, Ole Holm Nielsen carved some runes like this: > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:03:59 +0100 > From: Ole Holm Nielsen <Ole.H.Nielsen@fysik.dtu.dk> > Subject: Re: Dial in accounts > Regarding remote network browsing: > We have had mixed success browsing Network Neighborhood from > PPP-connected Win95 PCs. Our servers are all SAMBA, no NT here :-)
1998 Aug 11
1
SAMBA digest 1775
When the world was young, Adam Snodgrass carved some runes like this: > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 19:06:07 -0400 > Subject: Failure to execute programs from a mapped drive letter on a samba > I have a strange situation. I have a Linux machine running samba > 1.9.18p8, serving a mix of NT Workstation 4.0 and Windows 95 clients. In > general, things have worked flawlessly, with one
2001 Dec 04
2
Newbie (groan... !) Client Problem
I've studied the books, searched the list archives, etc. I suspect there is someone who can just tell me one thing to tweek, so I humbly beg your advice. Situation: I am playing with/learning Linux, intending to replace our two company Netware servers sometime in the next 6 months. At home, I have an NT4.0/SPC PDC, an NT4.0/SP6 docked laptop, and an HP server with RH7.1 or 7.2 (2.4.??
1998 Aug 12
4
NT & Win98 slow copies
Howdy all: For those who are curious (eg, Peter de Groot <pdgtech@wantree.com.au>) here are the (I think) relevant posts from recent samba digests concerning win98 and or NT performance problems copying files between local drives and samba shares. It looks like there should be some new options to play with in the next samba release. Could Jeremy or Andrew confirm? (BTW, nice
1998 Sep 22
0
x filemanager (SAMBA digest 1819)
When the world was young, Joshua Pincus carved some runes like this: > I've got two questions, and I'll list them in order of importance. (1) Is > there a way, or is there any research/development going into unearthing a > way, to mount a samba filesystem like any other filesystem under UNIX? > > And (2), does anyone know of a good X filemanager? What I would really >