similar to: Security Concern with Samba server on the Internet

Yes, I know this is lame, but my location limits me to using a dial-up ISP. I am running asterisk with a T100P and a TDM400 card. I currently have dial-on-demand setup on the same box, using diald and an external modem. To prevent DOD from trying to dial out during an external call, I have an AGI script kill diald before initiating a call, and then restart it at the end of the call by looking

Okay here is my setup: Gentoo Box running 2.6.4 w/ 4 NICs 1 NIC is for internal network 3 NICs are for external network The machine has a static address assigned to the internal network nic. This nic runs dhcp and dns forwarding. The other 3 nics have external dynamic IP addresses. All will have the same gateway. There are 3 NICs because this is a very large pipe, that will only allocate a

I can not seem to get Samba and diald working together. Whenever I log in to my Windows 95 computer and it tries to map my drives to the Samba server diald dials and then the drive does not map. If I wait a minute or so and then right click on Network Neighborhood and do a find computer my Samba server shows up. I can than log on to Windows again and it maps the drive fine. Or I can unload diald

Hi, I have a problem with my script. I have a debian with a kernel 2.6.8 patched with patch-2.6.8-ja1.diff of nano.txt site. I have 3 internet connections : - eth1 : - ip : 192.168.8.75 - gw : 192.168.8.73 - eth2 : - ip : 192.168.1.200 - gw : 192.168.1.2 - eth3 : - ip : 192.168.2.200 - gw : 192.168.2.1 and my eth0 for

think i posted in the wrong ml the first time, sorry, reposting here hi, i recently updated to xen 3.2 and now networking has stopped working. i have a configuration with 2 nics: eth1 (internet) and eth0 (lan) when i start xen i get peth0,peth1 with no ip, and bridge eth0,eth1 with the right addresses the server running xen is also the lan gw the routing table seems ok 192.168.0.0 *

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi!, ok here is my question, I have 2 ISP''s connected to the firewall, and I already set up th routing tables, I have a 256k and a 1.5m connection, and I want a couple pcs from the internal network to masquerade through the 256k connection and the rest through the 1.5m connection, how do I setup this on shorewall??? I am not subscribed to the

I have a script for dual internet connections that does this: ------------------------- #!/bin/bash IF1=eth1 IP1=203.219.190.106 P1=203.219.190.105 P1_NET=203.219.190.104 IF2=eth2 IP2=220.245.224.46 P2=220.245.224.45 P2_NET=220.245.224.44 IF0=eth0 P0_net=192.168.0.0 TABLE1=inet1 TABLE2=inet2 ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table $TABLE1 ip route add default via $P1 table $TABLE1 ip

Hi, I had ordered a TDM40B and developers kit a few months ago. I have everything installed and working, with one exception - sound quality. When placing a call it sounds like a very bad cordless phone - lots of hiss / static in the background. This even happens with the dialtone, though it is much worse one the call is connected. This does not occur when the phone is directly connected to the

Hello Guys, I got trouble to get vserver work as gate: GATE=XX.XX.XX.XX YY_PORT=YY echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -F -t nat iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i venet0:0 --dport $YY_PORT \ -j DNAT --to-destination $GATE:$YY_PORT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport $YY_PORT \ -j MASQUERADE iptables -L -t nat Any suggestion? I got

Dear R-users, I would like to show you a simple example that gives an overview of one of my current issue. Although my working setting implies a different parametric model (which cannot be framed in the glm), I guess that what I'll get from the following example it would help for the next steps. Anyway here it is. Firstly I simulated from a series of exposures, a series of deaths (given a

Hello, I need to build a VPN, and I am not sure if tinc is the right tool to use. I am more familiar with OpenVPN. I have a few boxes at home, behind a router with a dynamic IP address. Those boxes host some services, like web sites, for instance. I have a server hosted online, with a few IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. All addresses being static, of course. I am planning to use tinc on Debian, to

Hello, I have a laptop with two network interfaces: eth0 (LAN) and eth1 (WAVELAN). Now I am looking for a way to route ssh and icpm packages via the wavelan interface and the rest over the LAN interface. My problem is now that every applications binds eth0 interface as default (which results in source addr 192.168.0.2). What I did is using SNAT to change source-address to 192.168.1.2 for packages

hi, i installed a fresh Xen 3.0.1 installation and setup ppp0 (Dom0) for Internet. Everything is working, till i want to create the MASQ rule, for Internet (DomU and real clients): iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE after that, i can''t ping anything to the internet. My old Firewall Setup used for Xen 2.0.7 stopps working too. Also "iptables -L" over SSH

Hi Andrê, So by nodes I assume you mean the "boxes". I would suggest each "box" gets it's own tinc node(with a static ip) and then on the server it should be a matter of pointing at the ip address of the appropriate box tinc ip address. I've done this myself with WireGuard and it works great. On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:14 AM André Rodier <andre at rodier.me>

I have followed the nat advice from this guide: http://wiki.kartbuilding.net/index.php/Xen_Networking#Routed_Networking_with_NAT_2 I have googled internet for weeks and read almost every thread in this forum without getting a working NAT on my system. My main question is how exactly will the iptable rules with MASQUERADE or POSTROUTING look like if you want access to the internet from Dom U ,

Research Assistant/Staff Scientist: Technology in Environmental Health (Silent Spring Institute; Boston, MA) Silent Spring Institute is a non-profit scientific research group studying the environment and health. We are a multi-disciplinary team and international leader in research on everyday exposures to hormone disruptors, tests for breast carcinogens, and environmental links to breast cancer.

Hi there. I have followed some documents found here and there, but do not have already success implementing a script using iptables and iproute. What I need is to send all traffic trough an ADSL line, but mail trough an expensive and slow DS0. The mail server lies on the PC acting also as firewall. I include the script. When using that I get some error messages (I found that the flush command

has this package been rebuilt? I didn't see an announcement for it. --Ajay, who's not bitchin', just wondering... -------- Original Message -------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated gaim package fixes security issues Advisory

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:31:41PM -0400, Rhys Ferris wrote: >Hello all, > >I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. > >System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1

Hi, I'm connecting 2 Asterisk servers with an IAX2 trunk. Trunk works fine in testing, no problems there but the Internet at server-A is an "on-demand" system that is based on the amount of http/https traffic going through it (or if the link is brought up manually/via scripting interface). As such there will be times that the link is down....workflow-wise this is not an issue (trunk