similar to: passwd and username encryption

Hello listmates. It appears that in order to authenticate a Mac OS X Lion client via NIS the passwords in passwd and passwd.byname maps need to be MD5 encrypted. How do I see what encryption has been used in my maps? How do I change it? Thanks. Boris.

Hi Railers, I''m looking for something to do asynchronous encryption - where the encryption and decryption keys are different. This is for a scenario where I want to be able to store some information in the database that can only be decrypted in a different physical location using a secret private key (which will not be stored on the machine doing the encrypting). I''m trying

Hi, There was a discussion a few months ago about a plugin for encrypting email before it hit the disk on the server, and doing transparent decryption while serving data to the client, see: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-July/041262.html We have a client/user who is interested in such a plugin, and I was wondering if there has been any progress on it yet. In our particular case,

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > > > GPG is really what you want to be using for this. OpenSSL is a general > toolkit that provide a lot of good functions, but you need to cobble some > things together yourself. GPG is meant to handle all of the other parts of > dealing with files. > > I will expand on

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Xinhuan Zheng <xzheng at christianbook.com> wrote: > Hello CentOS list, > I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt > very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size and > those are data backup. Every night the server generated a 250G data backup > and it?s tar?ed into one tarball file. I

I have a couple of question about Disk Encryption during an OS install. I want to setup encryption on a system where I might have to enlarge the LVM's by either adding another disk or by enlarging the disk size at a later date. This is a VMware VM so just increasing the size of an individual disk is pretty simple and then expanding the LVM on it. Should I use LVM or just Physical Disk

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Brian Mathis > <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > > > > > > GPG is really what you want to be using for this. OpenSSL is a general > > toolkit that provide a lot of good functions, but you need to cobble some > > things

Hey geeks, I have been reading several faqs and howtos now and haven't come very far with what I really wanted to accomplish: I have installed samba from the RH 7.2 distro rpm. I have set it up so I can access my windows shares on the linux mashine. I can "ping athlon" (which is the netbios-name for the win2k mashine) I can "ping linux" (which is obviously my

On 05/16/2018 06:07 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 15 May 2018 at 22:43 Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where >> server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? > > You could probably automate this with sieve and e.g. GnuPG, which would mean > that all your

s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner: starting s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner successfully started s6-rc: info: service base-addon-banner: starting ----------------------------------------------------------- Add-on: Network UPS Tools Manage battery backup (UPS) devices----------------------------------------------------------- Add-on version: 0.13.0 You are running the latest version

I've came across what appears to be a bug, but I wanted to get some feedback on the list before reporting it to make sure I'm not doing something stupid. I'm using 3.2.7. I see that when I do "getent passwd", I get an entry like this: testuser:*:1000:20:Test User:/home/poo/testuser:/bin/bash But when I do "getent passwd testuser", I get this:

Domain member server (Debian stretch with 4.8 from the Van Belle repo) getent passwd| grep nprice GIBB\nprice:*:1001104:1000513::/home/GIBB/nprice:/bin/false getent passwd GIBB\\nprice (returns nothing) getent passwd 1001104 also returns nothing wbinfo -u works fine wbinfo --uid-info 1001104 GIBB\nprice:*:1001104:1000513::/home/GIBB/nprice:/bin/false wbinfo -i GIBB\\nprice

On 2019/05/14 21:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> getent passwd GIBB\\nprice >> >> (returns nothing) > > > Now that is weird, it is usually 'getent password' returns nothing ;-) > > Just one thought, because '\n' is a linefeed, it might just be that, > so try <getent password 'GIBB\nprice'> > Nothing. I think maybe a

On 2019/05/15 09:52, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > Can the user login, or connect to a share ? > No. Just gets a password prompt > if root creates a file, can its ownership be changed with 'chown' ? No. Not to a domain user or group > > > I would be a lot more concerned if this was happening with every user, > you could also try upgrading Samba to 4.9.x

Author: ssdevi Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: beb304dd81e3e3a75557bf40881662b31ae6c5d2 Log message: 6225117 passwd -r nisplus -e username will corrupt the users passwd Files: update: usr/src/cmd/rpcsvc/nis/rpc.nispasswdd/npd_svc.c

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3553 Bug ID: 3553 Summary: PROTOCOL.key format specification is incorrect for encryption using AEAD transports Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.3p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi All, When ss-keygen creates a private key, I guess it stores it in the private key file after encrypting it with the passphrase. What kind of encryption does ssh-keygen use for OpenSSH, SSH1 and SSH2? Another question: OpenSSH doesn't support all the ciphers of either SSh-1 or SSH-2? So I assume it doesn't work exhaustively with the SSH1 or SSH2 clients? Can we consider OpenSH as a

On 16.05.2018 12:56, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 05/16/2018 06:07 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 15 May 2018 at 22:43 Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where >>> server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? >> You could probably automate this with

>> A - I thought badlock mitigation was about encrypting SMB traffic, at least most part of it. >> And this encryption of most part of data transfer could (or should) lower performances. >> It seems I was wrong: smallest part (something like commands) are encrypted but not SMB traffic (ie file transfer). >> This for SMB protocol prior to SMB3 (which comes with windows 8).

I am not currently subscribed so please email me below. First, my only experience with rsync has been older versions (e.g. 1.7.x) which did not allow daemon mode, so please bear with me. My problem is that I would like to mirror large quantities of data on a remote machine to a local one, but I don't care about encrypting the data itself. I only care about securing the connection from the