similar to: Very slow writes to Samba server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Very slow writes to Samba server"

1998 Jun 01
0
SAMBA digest 1704
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > > Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 23:54:25 +0100 > From: Jonathan Peterson <jon@amxstudios.com> > To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au > Subject: Very slow writes to Samba server > Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19980530235425.006ff4c0@amxstudios.com> > > Hi, > > I'm using the latest samba with encrypted passwords, on a
1998 Oct 26
0
SAMBA digest 1853
samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > > SAMBA Digest 1853 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: long winded printing LARGE files soloution > by Heiko Nardmann <h.nardmann@secunet.de> > 2) Samba replacing NFS > by Jonathan Peterson
1998 Jun 04
1
Slow writes continued
I posted a while back about getting very slow writes. People suggested modifying (increasing) SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF and this actually helps enormously. However, there is obviously something still not right. Writes are still about 1/2 the speed of reads. This only seems to affect Win95 clients (NT machines are fine). Doing a write of a 20mb file to the server generates the following message:
1998 Jun 03
1
Refusing password from win95 client
This is surely in a FAQ somewhere, but I can't find it. Latest ver. of samba on RH Linux 5.0, encrypt. passwds. My Win95 clients were happy. Then I used poledit to turn off password caching and now they are not happy. The problem is that they can't connect to their home directories. Guest shares are fine, and other shares that require passwords are fine, but when you connect to your home
1998 Oct 26
0
Linux system crash - odd samba kernel messages
My Linux box just bit the dust in a dramatic fashion (complete lockup, needed a cold reboot). Although I am not at all sure what the cause was, the last message in the system log mentioned samba, and there are some other funny looking samba-related messages in there. I'm not asking for a diagnostic, but if anyone has seen these before, maybe they can tell me what they mean: Last message
1998 Jul 08
0
folders with veto files not being deleted
Hi, I am running the latest Samba (p8) on Solaris 2.6. The PC clients are running win95 OSR2. I am using encrypted passwords. I have some files vetoed: veto files = /.rssrc/.desktop/ I'm not using 'hide dot files'. If I have a folder with one file in, and that file is a vetoed file, I cannot delete the folder. I have unix permissions to delete both. The windows error message is:
1998 Jul 08
0
passwd chat string for Solaris 2.6?
I've been playing with this for hours and not worked it out. Has anyone got a passwd chat string that works with Solaris 2.6 or something near it? I turned on debugging, but after wading through the megabytes of output, I still see little if any correlation between changes to the passwd chat string and lines appearing in the log. So can someone be nice and send me something? Thanks.
1998 Oct 23
4
Samba replacing NFS
Hi, I have a number of web servers that mount their /htdocs (and /log and /cgi-bin) directories from a large file server. I am currently using NFS for this. The web servers are Linux, the file server a Sun E450. NFS seems dreadfully slow, and I keep reading about how it doesn't do file locking. Is there a good reason not to simply use samba, and share the volumes with samba from the Sun, and
2005 Aug 19
2
FXO not picking up; baffled
I'm a newbie to Asterisk, but I'm moderately knowledgeable about phone systems. Right now, I'm most certainly confused. I have a TDM-04B (four FXO) and four analog FXO lines running into it from an AdTran 616. I have Asterisk working internally, although I could use some help getting incoming calls to answer properly and configuring my outbound dialplan. Here's where I'm
2009 Jul 08
2
Problem accessing a share on a W2008 server via smbclient
Hi We just installed a W server 2008 server as antivirus server. As this server is heavily underused we created a share to backup files from other servers. This share is easily accessed from XP pro Pc's via \\ipadr\share and giving a user/password name on the W 2008 server. We then try to use it from an open suse 9.3 linux server via smbclient. smbclient //ipadr/share -U user%password
2005 May 07
4
string syntactic sugar in R? - long post
Currently in R, constructing a string containing values of variables is done using 'paste' and can be an error-prone and traumatic experience. For example, when constructing a db query we have to write, paste("SELECT " value " FROM table where date ='",cdate,"'") we are getting null result from it, because without (forgotten...)
2015 Jul 02
0
Dovecot auth username mapping
It?s actually unbelievable how much slower LDAP auth is than PAM. Does anyone have any suggestions how I can improve Dovecot LDAP auth? I have tried caching authentications and that doesn?t help either. ~ Laz Peterson Paravis, LLC Ph: 951.319.3240 x201 > On Jul 1, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Laz C. Peterson <laz at paravis.net> wrote: > > Thank you for the response Axel. I will look
2009 May 13
0
AGI scripts in Groovy, JavaScript, JRuby or PHP running on the Java Virtual Machine
Hi, We've just finished adding support for writing AGI scripts in a variety of popular scripting languages to Asterisk-Java. The FastAGI server in Asterisk-Java allows you to move your AGI scripts to a dedicated server and increases performance by eleminating the need to start the language interpreter for each request. Our current snapshot release includes an AGI demo in Groovy, JavaScript
2015 Jul 21
2
dovecot proxy/director and high availability design
I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I don't think there's anything wrong with that though. On 07/21/2015 11:54 AM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: > The consensus seems to say no to RR DNS ? I am going to take that into serious consideration. > > With this proxy setup you describe, what
2006 Oct 10
1
Mitel 5224/SIP no MWI
Does anybody know if this is supposed to work and if so, what, if any, workaround is needed? I have other phones (Snom, Polycom) MWI working with this system fine. 6.0.0.19 (latest) Mitel SIP firmware is loaded. Thanks for your time, - Jesse -- Jesse Peterson <jesse.peterson@exbiblio.com>
2015 Jul 02
1
Dovecot auth username mapping
Peter, Yes that is a possibility. I will try disabling PAM (or switching the auth order) and see if that makes a difference. Thanks for the suggestion! ~ Laz Peterson Paravis, LLC Ph: 951.319.3240 x201 > On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:34 PM, Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > Am 2015-07-02 um 01:41 schrieb Laz C. Peterson: >> >> I did attempt to switch the
2012 Dec 11
2
VarimpAUC in Party Package
Greetings! I'm trying to use function varimpAUC in the party package (party_1.0-3 released September 26th of this year). Unfortunately, I get the following error message: > data.cforest.varimp <- varimpAUC(data.cforest, conditional = TRUE) Error: could not find function "varimpAUC" Was this function NOT included in the Windows binary I downloaded and installed? Could someone
2010 Jul 26
2
chan_skinny still maintained?
Hi, I've managed to acquire a few Cisco handsets (7905, 7920) and would like to use them with Asterisk. Rather than simply switching to the SIP firmware I thought I'd use these with chan_skinny - partly because this is Cisco's primary firmware and therefore the phones might be more stable, and partly to help test chan_skinny as it seems to be generally underused. (Is functionality
2010 Feb 17
0
[Reminder] R/Finance 2010: Applied Finance with R
[ Registration for R/Finance 2010 is going strong: after only ten days of registrations one tutorial is already at 65% of capacity, and two others are approaching the 50% mark. Tutorials are capped at fourty participants each, the conference itself may be capped at three hundred registrations. Conference details are provided below. ] R/Finance 2010: Applied Finance
2015 Jul 21
0
dovecot proxy/director and high availability design
The consensus seems to say no to RR DNS ? I am going to take that into serious consideration. With this proxy setup you describe, what would happen if HAProxy or Dovecot Proxy were to fail? I think there is no problem with many moving parts, as long as there is a backup plan in case something goes awry. My goal is slightly different, as I want to have HA available across datacenters without