similar to: partial mantel tests in ecodist with intential NA values.

I would like to put confidence intervals on a mantel corellogram they are already calculated in the pmgram object but I am unsure how I get the x value in order to plot them? package(ecodist) X<-1:100 Y<-rnorm(1:100) Z<-rnorm(1:100) XY<-dist(data.frame(X,Y)) YX<-dist(data.frame(Y,X)) my.mgram<-mgram(XY,XZ) plot(my.mgram) print(my.mgram) > print(my.mgram) $mgram

Dear Dr.Goslee and anyone may intrested in matrix manipulate, I am using your ecodist to do mantel and partial mantel test, I have locality data and shape variation data, and the two distance matrixs are given as belowings. When I run the analysis, it is always report that the matrix is not square, but I didn't know what's wrong with my data. Would you please help me on this. I am quite

What is the size of the boostrapped subsample in ecodist mantel() thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I'm searching for a little clarification on partial mantel tests (ecodist package) I've a distance matrix (x,y), and several others containing environmental/chemical variables. Based on the help file, and the package instructions I've managed to implement the tests as; var1 ~ env1 + space to partial out the effect of space and test the relationship between the

Hi, I'm interested in incorporating some interaction terms between my explanatory variables (distance matrices in this case) when I'm using the function MRM of the package ecodist. The function is doing a multiple regression on distance matrices. I can get the function to work perfectly on my explanatory matrices by adding a (+) sign as known. However, when I try to use the (*) sign or

I am looking for simple introduction to cluster analysis using R, that would be understandable to a novice in statistics. Or, could someone perhaps help me understand how to proceed in my analysis? I am very new to both statistics and R, but am trying hard to avoid having to use SPSS as everyone around me... I have dataset on people presenting their opinions on different religious

Dear all, Dose anyone know whether there is a good R packege or program for Mantel's randomization test? Thanks in advance. ------------------------ Takashi Mizuno zoono at sci.osaka-cu.ac.jp Plant Ecology Lab. Osaka City University ------------------------ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hi there, I am using libvirt with lxc to create fedora 16 & 18 containers on fedora 18 host. first I did the setup with libvirt 1.0.3 and everything worked fine, then after upgrading to libvirt 1.0.4, I could not create character device on the guests : Test on the guest1 : # ls -l /dev total 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Apr 17 21:18 console -> /dev/pts/0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11

Hello, I'm facing an issue where deleted emails keep re-appearing after my mailbox index gets recreated.??I'm running version 2.2.36 of dovecot, but I tested the same scenario under 2.3.10. I'm also using mdbox, autoexpunge, and using dovecot replication. I've had several instances now where some expunged emails show up again in a mailbox. I noticed this error: doveadm: Error:

But is that not adviced in the manual[1]? I am also in the process of setting up dovecot behind a haproxy. Still testing with this. I was wondering why one would choose haproxy and not eg dovecot proxy (with director) [1] https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HAProxy -----Original Message----- From: Zelic Bojan [mailto:bojan.zelic at kudelskisecurity.com] Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2020 23:39 To:

?I managed to figure this out. Just wanted to follow up if anyone in the future encounters the same issue. I am using HAProxy along with dovecot replication. When an email comes in... it is round robin'd to each of the 2 dovecot/postfix servers. I have postfix running on each server and it uses the local dovecot LMTP service for storing the mails. We sometimes get surges of emails(hundreds

I''m curious if there has been any discussion of or work done toward implementing storage classing within zpools (this would be similar to the storage foundation QoSS feature). I''ve searched the forum and inspected the documentation looking for a means to do this, and haven''t found anything, so pardon the post if this is redundant/superfluous. I would imagine this would

I''ve got a DL145g3 which is reporting svm support in /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 65 model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2214 HE stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2200.000 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fpu