similar to: Sysctl on Kernel 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

We use SMB to transfer large files (between 1GB and 5GB) from RedHat AS4 Content Storage servers to Windows clients with 6 DVD burners and robotic arms and other cool gadgets. The servers used to be Windows based, but we're migrating to RedHat for a host of reasons. Unfortunately, the RedHat Samba servers are about 2.5 times slower than the Windows servers. Windows will copy a 1GB file

Hi all: I have some kvm host(rhel 6.4, 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64), I ran several windows guest on it(more than 10 guest on one host and the guest os are win7-32/win7-64/win2k8), but the guest network kept down automatically, lost package. I tried virtio drive and e1000 drive,but it didn't work. However, when I run cmd.exe ping some other subnet ip it worked. The host and guest are connected by

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.

Hi all, I order to reach maximum performance on my centos kvm hosts I have use these params: - On /etc/grub.conf: kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ elevator=deadline quiet - On sysctl.conf # Special network params net.core.rmem_default = 8388608 net.core.wmem_default = 8388608 net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216

You really meant 300 _M_bps as the upper bound according to Enterasys. My switches are from Enterasys too. After a firmware updates I get about 722 Mbps both ways. The client's disk drive (Maxtor 250 GB) can't read or write faster. If you don't get transfer rates in the immediate neighbourhood of the read/write speeds of your client's disk drives, then your network setup (hardware

Hi list (and happy new year), I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over VPN. Basically we've following setup : PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost always ends up with a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error (or "a network error occured" if trying to copy from

Currently I'm running CentOS 4.4 on a Dell Poweredge 850 with an Intel Pro/1000 Quad-port adapter. I seem to be able to only achieve 80% utilization on the adapter, while on the same box running Fedora Core 5 I was able to reach 99% utilization. I am using iSCSI Enterprise Target as my application and I am using the nullio feature, it just discards any write and sends back random data for

I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS 5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170. A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped responding to NFS requests for two minutes every half an hour (approx). Let's call this "the hang". It has been doing this for four days now. There are no log messages of any kind pertaining

I get these errors from the following settings in /etc/sysctl.conf file: # Custom Settings: net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=2048 net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=30 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl=10 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes=7 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time=1800 net.ipv4.tcp_max_tw_buckets=360000 net.ipv4.tcp_synack_retries=3 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096 87380 16777216" net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4096

Hello all, I'm currently experiencing an issue with an NFS server I've built (a Dell R710 with a Dell PERC H800/LSI 2108 and four external disk trays). It's a backup target for Solaris 10, CentOS 5.5 and CentOS 6.2 servers that mount it's data volume via NFS. It has two 10gig NICs set up in a layer2+3 bond for one network, and two more 10gig NICs set up in the same way in another

Our Invoice posting routine (intensive harddrive io) freezes every few seconds to flush the cache. Reading this: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2002-November/msg00070.html I decided to try: # elvtune -r 2048 -w 131072 /dev/sda # echo "90 500 0 0 600000 600000 95 20 0" >/proc/sys/vm/bdflush # run_post_routine # elvtune -r 128 -w 512 /dev/sda # echo "30 500 0 0

(Sent to linux-raid, linux-kernel and ext3-users since I'm not sure what type of issue this is) I've got a test system here running Redhat 7.1 + stock 2.4.9 with these patches: http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.9/linux-2.4.9-NFS_ALL.dif http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/ext3-2.4-0.9.6-249.gz http://domsch.com/linux/aacraid/linux-2.4.9-aacraid-20010816.patch All three patches applied

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. Hi, I am using CentOS 5.0 at home, ADSL ~16 Mbps/~1 Mbps Internet connection and my ping time to my ISP is 160-170 msec. When downloading something with Firefox, I am getting download speeds of about 100-180 KB/sec (for example when downloading SP2 of XP from MS server). Are the CentOS networking settings OK for this kind of latency, or do I have to change some settings?

Am 07.01.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Hi list (and happy new year), > > I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over > VPN. Basically we've following setup : > > PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server > > Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost > always ends up with a

Le 07/01/2016 12:22, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 100 > ______________________________________________ > > ifcfg-eth0: > > ETHTOOL_OPTS="-K ${DEVICE} tso on lro off; -G ${DEVICE} rx 128 tx 128" > ______________________________________________ > > sysctl.conf: > > net.core.rmem_max = 65536 > net.core.wmem_max = 65536

i all I use linux as GiGE router and have 6 NIC on it Those days the NIC interrupt takes around 100% CPU but the system is 4G memroy and 8 CPU. I can't see any error packet in this NIC interface too After I block the udp, the %CPU drops. but the UDP only takes around 8M in general We use UDP traffic for voice. Do you have any suggestion ? increase the kernel parameter? Thank you so much

Hi, I''m doing some test on a network 10 gb nics and xen with version 3.1 i''m measuring 2.5 gb/sec from domU to an external physical machine with iperf. switching to 3.2 has reduced the measured performance to 40-50 Mb/sec. did anything change in the network interface? can someone help me? thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Greetings all, I have a question regarding the fsync data corruption bug that was introduced in 2.4.20 when using data=journal. I have patched the 2.4.20 kernel with the 3 sync patches available from zip.com.au, and I am wondering if with these patches the "bug" still exists: sync_fs.patch sync_fs-fix.patch sync_fs-fix-2.patch In addition the following two patches have also