similar to: Rpmbuild and how to disable automatic dependency list creation.

Hello. What's the proper way to remove *all symbols* from ELF binaries when building packages with rpmbuild on CentOS? Seems that an out of the box rpmbuild install only discards debugging symbols (strip -g). That's the default configuration for %__os_install_post on CentOS, the step in charge on stripping binaries: $ rpmbuild --showrc (..) -14: __os_install_post

HI people , I am not sure whether this is right mailing list for this question , but i tried subscribing to redhat rpm list , failed to do so . I'm facing a issue while creating RPM for python punjab http://code.stanziq.com/punjab/ I've created a spec file which contains the list of files to packaged http://pastie.org/1236027 And when i try to run rpmbuild -ba command on this spec

Hi, Is there any nice way in a .spec file to tell rpmbuild not to call brp-java-repack-jars? Some Web Searching indicates that most people just hack the script. Is there a better way ?

Hello group, I have downloaded the source file of samba 3: samba-3.0.0rc2-1.src.rpm.And build it for redhat 9.0,I didn't see any redhat package of samba 3 for redhat 9.0. when i install the source,and built redhat package using the following command: rpmbuild -ba samba3.spec. It seem OK,but at last,it report the error: Can everybody help me and show me how to fix the error. Thanks a lot.

Am 21.08.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su>: >> On CentOS 7, I'm building a large C++ package with rpmbuild. Arachne >> (https://www.broadinstitute.org/crd/wiki/index.php/Arachne_Main_Page). >> During the debuginfo extraction stage, I get the following error: >> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz

On 21/08/15 22:46, Andrew Neuschwander wrote: > On 08/21/2015 02:04 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 21.08.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su>: >>>> On CentOS 7, I'm building a large C++ package with rpmbuild. Arachne >>>> (https://www.broadinstitute.org/crd/wiki/index.php/Arachne_Main_Page). >>>> During the

I am attempting to build from a src.rpm (knowing very little about rpm at all) and the spec file notes that the architecture should be set on the command line: > # platform defines - set one below or define the build_xxx on the command line Now. My question is this, how does one do this using rpmbuild? The syntax rpmbuild --target centos4 package.src.rpm seemingly has no effect.

Over the weekend my workstation (still on CentOS 3) started showing SMART errors, so we shut it down and moved everything onto a new drive. On reboot, the RPM database reports as corrupted and "rpm --rebuilddb" segmentation faults. Is there any reasonable way to recover from this, short of a complete reinstall? The machine is otherwise up though it''s quite likely some files

Hi, I'm trying to compile samba 3.0.21rc2 in Centos 4.2 and I get this errors: First, this easy one: [root@mpl SOURCES]# rpmbuild -ta --clean --target=i686 samba-3.0.21rc2.tar.gz Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 error: File /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/samba-3.0.21rc2.tar.bz2: No such file or directory I solved by creating a .bz2 file: tar xzf samba-3.0.21rc2.tar.gz tar

Hi. I googled for this thoroughly but couldn''t find any module that actually worked. Is there any good puppet module or manifest for installing Sun JDK? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

CentOS, I'm not sure where to ask this, please let me know if there is a more appropriate place. On CentOS 7, I'm building a large C++ package with rpmbuild. Arachne (https://www.broadinstitute.org/crd/wiki/index.php/Arachne_Main_Page). During the debuginfo extraction stage, I get the following error: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz

I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts. So far it seems to be working fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in advance. # Don't depend on Net::LDAP # one filter for RH 8 and one for 9 Source998: filter-requires-samba_rh8.sh Source999: filter-requires-samba_rh9.sh # Working around perl

I have been following the MaximumRPM guide from here: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/index.html and it seems a bit dated, but still very good (if fact the best all round documentation I have found so far) on using RPM package manager, and how to build rpm packages. The guide tells me to use the original paths, yet Centos wiki says otherwise. [rpmbuilder at karsites sox]$ rpm -iv

I posted this message first. But it was missing so I post again. I think there is a some bug in build configration files. Can you check up the following errors and fix it? The error has no concern with UTF-8 patch. Environment : CentOS 4.3 x86_64 Sungsoo Kim ---------------------------------- [root at saturn xapian-core-0.9.4_svn6707]# make ... ... mkdir .libs/libxapian.lax/libqueryparser.a

On Monday 11 March 2019 14:28:38 Pete Biggs wrote: > > However, as I went for bigger modules, anything that had dependences > > were then failing as the dependencie were installed OK but then did not > > appear to be available. > A number of things you can do. The sort of recommended way is to > package the perl modules into an RPM and install them that way (so that >

Hi folks, Just updating clamav 'bundle' from old 'clamav-server' (i think the just previous) and i noticed that the 'clamav' user/group for this pkg is not created by default by the rpm pkg. At the same time, the /var/log/clamav is not updated/created with clamav.clamav ownership, Don't know if it is my actual config (previous one untouched anyway), but this is what

On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >>>> >>>> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key

On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> hi, >> >> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >> >> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID >> ad3b591d147abf59 >> >> Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 >> >> Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58

Am 24.11.2014 um 13:35 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 11/23/2014 10:23 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: >> >> Hello Centos, >> >> Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 >> 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on >> the system? >> >> yum install perl >>

hi, I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID ad3b591d147abf59 Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 I'm trying to find where / how to use sha256 when I sign packages but I am not having much luck. Closest I have found is this :