similar to: Slow perl on CentOS - ActivePerl as a solution

Full_Name: Nisai Wanakule Version: 1.7.1 OS: Solaris 2.9 Submission from: (NULL) (65.32.94.36) I tried to install RSPerl with --with-in-perl option and got some errors. R was built with --enable-R-shlib as indicated in the RSPerl instructions. Here is the list output during installation: nisai@lagrange:src 102$ R CMD INSTALL -c --configure-args='--with-in-perl' RSPerl_0.5-7.tar.gz *

List, I have an 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen X86_64 machine that is failing to update perl. I did not see any bugs reported on the list and was wondering if anyone else had the same problem with a solution. Thanks, Greg Ennis Updating: perl x86_64 4:5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 updates 12 M Transaction Summary

Hi, I get the following error while installing the newest centos patches. [root at gateway ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: centos.intergenia.de * base: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --->

I am a rank newbie to Linux and wine. I am running Ubuntu Dapper on an AMD 1800 mhz machine, wine 0.9.15 Everything I have read says use the installer to load windows programs. Where is the installer? Thanks, -- Ron Thompson On the Beautiful Florida Space Coast, right beside the Kennedy Space Center, USA http://www.plansandprojects.com My hobby pages are here:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 653294 + jessie Bug #653294 [hellanzb] hellanzb: doesn't work with python-twisted 11.1.0-1 (patch included) Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 701439 + jessie Bug #701439 [src:ircd-hybrid] ircd-hybrid: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 616910 + jessie Bug #616910 [src:musiclibrarian] musiclibrarian: deprecation of

I don't think that XFS is a desktop filesystem at all. This is from XFS FAQ: qoute ------------ Q: Why do I see binary NULLS in some files after recovery when I unplugged the power? If it hurts don't do that! * NOTE: XFS 1.1 and kernels => 2.4.18 has the asynchronous delete path which means that you will see a lot less of these problems. If you still have not updated to the 1.1

I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors. The test is simple: format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total

I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors. The test is simple: format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total

I tried it on loop. 1. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test -t ext3 2. cp files to 100% full 3. umount /mnt/test 4. fsck.ext3 -f /dev/loop0 Inode xxxxx, i_blocks is xxx, should be yyy. Fix?