similar to: place values into a matrix efficiently?

Hi, So far as I can tell, the 'col.ticks' parameter for axis() only uses the first value provided. E.g.: plot(0:1,0:1, col.ticks=c('blue','red','green')) #all ticks are blue Just wondering if there's a different option in the basic plot commands that can handle multiple colors, and also whether ggplot and/or lattice allow for multiple tick colors.

"Not that it really matters, but" Can someone explain how the row numbers get assigned in the following sequence? It looks like something funky happens when rbind() coerces 'bar' into a dataframe. In either sequence of rbind below, once you get past the first two rows, the row numbers count normally. Rgames> (foo<-data.frame(x=5,y=4,r=3)) x y r 1 5 4 3 Rgames>

HI, Sorry Carl, I received your message in my spam folder. Sarah proposed me a good example of code. Thank you Momadou  ________________________________ De : Carl Witthoft [via R] <ml-node+s789695n4188375h96@n4.nabble.com> Envoyé le : Mardi 13 Décembre 2011 3h34 Objet : Re: Polygon Please read the posting guide and provide a (small) reproducible example of your data. The statement

Dear R Developers, DISCLAIMER: I am new to package development in R and new to this list. I am trying to do something along the lines of: SEXP test_fun (SEXP filename) { const char *inputfile = translateChar(STRING_ELT(filename, 0)); int abc = some_function(inputfile); ... } The code compiles fine, but I get a warning: "passing argument of 'some_function' discards qualifiers

Dear, I'm following the r tag on stackoverflow.com, and couldn't but notice there are quite some questions popping up that deal with scoping in relation to custom functions. I grinded my teeth on it already, and I have absolutely no clue what goes wrong. The general pattern is as follows : ff <- function(x){ y <- some_value some_function(y) } > ff(x) Error in eval(expr,

Hello all, I should probably know this by now... Anyway: I have a large matrix (dim(data) is 3000 18000). In each element are one of the following character strings "0/0", "1/1", "1/2", "2/2". I wanted to replace "0/0" with NA and the other three with 0,1,2 respectively. To accomplish just the first of these four steps I did this:

Hi, Suppose I have the following tabular data: 1729_at | TRADD | TNFRSF1A-associated via death domain | protein-coding 1773_at | FNTB | farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, beta | protein-coding 177_at | PLD1 | phospholipase D1, phosphatidylcholine-specific | protein-coding What is the right separator used for read.table function? I tried this: dat <-

Of course, this is normal for C-APIs. But maybe change the name to LLVMResult to propagate the real use? I am not arguing about the results themself. They are standard. But the name is missguiding. As long as it's consistent i know that i have to write an extra record operator in Delphi to reflect this. 2016-09-12 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On

Hello, Here is a dilemma I am having for a long time. But, I couldn't figure it out. I have an vector of Y and a data frame named "data",which contains all Xs. I tried to be more efficient in fitting a simple linear regression with each X. Firstly, for (i in 1:(dim(data)[2])){ model<-lm(Y~data[,i]) # this is not what I want since the name of coefficient will be data[,i] # I

On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Yeah, I can't think of any use for something that would pull out NamedMDNodes for no reason. That said, if you want this to work, please audit the module cloner at the very least (it should copy the NamedMDNodes). > > But what would you do with llvm-extract? llvm-extract already copies over named metadata. > Should it keep a

Hi I want to generate 4 random number which sum up to 100 always Please help ----- Thanks in Advance Arun -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/runif-with-condition-tp4278704p4278704.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

This time it's complete with assertions on make debug, proper ./configure switches for the optional features, visibility and warning flags, and summary at the end of the configuration. Signed-off-by: Diego Elio Petten? <flameeyes at flameeyes.eu> --- .gitignore | 29 +++++ Makefile.am | 24 +++++ autogen.sh | 3 + configure.ac | 66 ++++++++++++

This time it's complete with assertions on make debug, proper ./configure switches for the optional features, visibility and warning flags, and summary at the end of the configuration. Signed-off-by: Diego Elio Petten? <flameeyes at flameeyes.eu> --- .gitignore | 29 +++++ Makefile.am | 24 +++++ configure.ac | 66 ++++++++++++ m4/attributes.m4 | 321

Just now I again had occasion to want nested describe lists in a documentation file. I found that the bug which I reported on 18 October, 2001 still persists. I checked on the bug report at the R web page, and found that the notes say ``Not a problem in R 1.4.0 (2001-12-08)''. Well, it's still a problem for me --- using R 1.4.1. (Details: platform sparc-sun-solaris2.7 arch

Includes - A make debug target that disables optimizations and enables assertions, - Proper ./configure switches for the optional features, - A configuration summary, - libtool versioning information, - Visibility and warning flags, - API documentation, and - Support for out-of-tree builds. Signed-off-by: Diego Elio Petten? <flameeyes at flameeyes.eu> --- .gitignore | 29 +++++

Hello, I am working multiple simulated data sets with missing values, I would like to store these data sets in either tab delimited format for .csv format with missing values marked as NaN's instead of NA's. I read the import/export document which mentions that write.table command converts NaN's to NA. Is there any other way I can store the NaN's. I tried the write syntax

Hi, I have a problem with a package I have developed in that functions do not get loaded due to older versions of the functions being in the .GlobalEnv? fetched from .Rdata files stored from previous saved workspaces. I need to be able to fix this somehow when I load the package. I do not want to mess up the search order to fix the problem. How I got myself into this mess is that I started

I have a really horrendous problem with sessions. before_filter :find_cart_from_session private def find_cart_from_session if session[:cart] # if there''s is a cart in the session begin @cart = Cart.find(session[:cart]) # return existing or new cart rescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound @cart = Cart.create @cart.save session[:cart] = @cart.id

Hi, I'm a biologist, so please forgive me if my question sounds absurd! I have 3 parameters x1, x2, x3 and a response variable y.The sample size is 75. I tried to do the following: mylm<-lm(y~ x1 + x2 + x3, data="mydata") but i can only get stats from anova for the first 2 variables. The third comes up as NA. The degrees of freedom for the third variable are 0. Is there

Hi, I stumbled across the following: > /* Builds a module from the bitcode in the specified memory buffer, > returning a > reference to the module via the OutModule parameter. Returns 0 on success. > */ > LLVMBool LLVMParseBitcode2(LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf, > LLVMModuleRef *OutModule); However in most scenarios i know, a Bool is something like 0 = False !0 = True In short: