similar to: Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]

Hello Nut List! I have 2 "Lacerda 10KVA" UPS that returns strange values for Q1 and F commands: Q1 (215.0 215.0 219.0 004 60.0 2.27 39.0 00000001 F #220.0 045 240.0 60.0 At least what I know about Megatec, It seems to say that it has a 240.0 V battery with currently 2.27V. Quite strange. I contacted Lacerda to help me interpret this values and they said that 2.27 is just 1 element

On Feb 11, 2008 5:30 PM, Marcio Gomes <mpg at microlink.com.br> wrote: > I change the if in [OFF] detect state to, in original way, if you send a > reset.watchdog, the UPS goes > to OFF state in clients, but it is not correct, because UPS is OL and > Shutdown are in progress, but > the power is not OFF First of all, thanks for the patch. But I have a few comments: Are you

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

Hello, I have bought Powerman Optima 500 Plus UPS. While this product might be unknown outside Russia, it is shipped with megatec software and obviously works with megatec driver in NUT. besides the following problems (I think they are caused by one reason): 1) megatac driver is able to load and detect UPS only on second or third run. On the first run it typically fails. Later if daemon is

Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:

Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:

Hi, Sorry for the forwarding. I sent this with the wrong "from" address and got rejected by the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at mail.telepac.pt> Date: Jun 18, 2007 9:34 PM Subject: Re: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb] To: Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> Cc: ups-dev-list <nut-upsdev at

Hi, Charles, On Wed, 2 May 2007 07:58:08 -0400, you wrote: > > Will that be enough to make it useable as a contribution? I believe > > the more sensible values for 36V UPS'es will be useful to other models > > than the one I have, too. > > Sounds good, but I don't think I saw it hit the list yet... I now have the following in megatec.c: static BatteryVolts

Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'

Hi folks! We have a Powercom Vanguard 6000 running here. It seems to be supported by the megatec driver within nut. So I get everything out of it exept the battery status. When I run Nut, it says: Megatec protocol UPS detected [UPS Model 6K Ver Y1.3]. This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries. The "battery.charge" value will be bogus. So I would

Hello, I'm trying to get my UPS working with nut-hal-drivers, and it seems be detected correctly with Megatec protocol, but it provides wrong battery level. I read that I can use battvolts option to fix this problem, but HAL version of nut does not come with any config files. So, I'm guess it should be somehow fixed in sources? Parameters of Ippon Back Comfo Pro 800: VA = 800 max

Hi, everyone, I've recently bought a UPS from Mecer. This is a South African brand that basically resells Mustek hardware, and this UPS is no exception; it's a Mustek product. It does come with software for Linux, but that is terrible (the background process that monitors the UPS is written in Java and needs a terminal to start properly, so you can't run it from a startup script...

Hi, everyone, I've recently bought a UPS from Mecer. This is a South African brand that basically resells Mustek hardware, and this UPS is no exception; it's a Mustek product. It does come with software for Linux, but that is terrible (the background process that monitors the UPS is written in Java and needs a terminal to start properly, so you can't run it from a startup script...

I had some free time this weekend, and made some long overdue changes to "megatec". The thing is, these changes lead to a couple of questions that I must ask before I go on and "svn commit" them: 1) The blazer, fentonups, esupssmart, ippon, sms and mustek drivers are now completely covered and all of their functionality should now be present in megatec, and also every model

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080613/fe8f10a8/attachment.htm

Carlos, Have looked at the diff's between the trunk and Testing, I found that it would probably be very worthwhile to backport the driver from the trunk. As far as I can see, the driver in the trunk will allow for better debugging, which would be a welcome addition. Could you take care of that? Best regards, Arjen

Carlos, Today I was browsing through the NUT Tracker and noticed an entry which linked to a message on nut-upsdev: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2006-January/000559.html Although the fentonups driver is no longer in the tree (since it was replaced by the megatec driver), I think there is still some merit in this patch. Notice the following lines from this message: >

Hi, I am not sure if you are the list to hit with this, but NUT's megatec driver support ours "Numeric Digital 3000 sw" UPS - at least that's what it claims on front- at the Watcher telescope at Boyden Observatory / RSA. I wasn't able to find manufacturer, but it looks Numeric is some existing UPS factory. I did not receive any informations from manufacturer, so I believ

Hi there! I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do something useful for me. Few questions: 1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events. I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look for them? 2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex running (previously used with Upsilon /

Hi Jayson, I forward your request to the right place. Carlos (or some other) will have an answer, or at least some questions for you. -- Arnaud 2008/6/27 Jayson Anderson <jayson.anderson at gmail.com>: > Greetings Arnaud, > > I wrote you some time ago about whether NUT would support the Belkin > F6H550-UPS device in the future. > > You had replied and mentioned to send