similar to: Iptables configuration to handle brute force registrations?

fail2ban might be good for this. On 04/05/2011 01:00 PM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:44:41 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Edwards<asterisk.org at sedwards.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Iptables configuration to handle brute > force registrations? > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Gilles wrote: > >> I'm no expert

just wanted to get some feedback from the community. Over the last few days I have noticed my web server and email box have attempted to ssh'd to using weird names like admin,appuser,nobody,etc.... None of these are valid users. I know that I can block sshd all together with iptables but that will not work for us. I did a little research on google and found programs like sshguard and

> > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > attempts and dnsbl): > > > >

Hello I read a whole book on OpenVPN, but still can't figure how to configure the server + client so that the the client connects and sends SIP/RTP data through the tunnel. To get started, I'd rather use a shared key instead of X509 (certificates + keys). The server is running on a uClinux appliance, with /dev/net/tun, and OpenVPN is 2.0.9. The clients will be Windows hosts connecting

Hello On a uClinux-based appliance, "ps aux" shows multiple Asterisk processes: 380 root 11990 S asterisk -f 381 root 11990 S asterisk -f 383 root 11990 S asterisk -f 384 root 11990 S asterisk -f 385 root 11990 S asterisk -f 386 root 11990 S asterisk -f 387 root 11990 S asterisk -f 388 root 11990 S asterisk -f

> On 12 April 2019 18:11 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > > attempts and dnsbl): > > > > >

Hello I'd like to configure Asterisk so that... 1. I ring it from my cellphone with CID number displayed, just to notify Asterisk that I wish to make a call 2. Asterisk waits until I hang up, calls me back, and prompts me for the number I wish to call 3. Asterisk puts me on hold through Flash(), which is apparently the equivalent of hitting the R key on European handsets 4. Asterisk calls the

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2016-08-28, TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > >> Right now, I'm just trying to take some load off my >> home server from badbots but I am getting hit on other services as well. > > Another possibility for you to look at is sshguard. It can

Hello, We had been seeing SIP-guessing attacks on our Asterisk server here. While it wasn't that hard to write a once-a-minute cron job to spank the lusers, that runs once a minute and creates little spikes in the usage and I/O graphs, and is slower to respond than I'd really prefer. I felt that it'd be much cooler to get something more comprehensive put together. We don't use

Hi, I've installed the igraph package and have been otherwise using it successfully, but when I try to use graph.bfs I get the error: could not find function "graph.bfs" Moreover, I don't seem to have the documentation installed either. (per ?graph.bfs and ??graph.bfs). I'm using RStudio v0.95.262 on windows 7. Below is the info for my R build: R version 2.14.0

Here is what I am trying to accomplish: I want to create a share that will force users to a ID and group, allow certain users write privileges to certain directories only and others read only. I have set this up and every time I create a file the owner is set to root and the group is correct. Any help would be great, the following is what I have in the smb.conf file: [migrate] path =

Has anyone checked to make sure that this won't upset sshguard? [1] Offhand, it looks like it will [2][3]. [1] https://www.sshguard.net/ [2] https://bitbucket.org/sshguard/sshguard/src/2ed7e0aee18b7271daab92d5335c14e04bb2cc89/src/parser/attacks.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#attacks.txt-9 [3]

Hi all, I have a file that samba does not know how to access. The file is located on a w2k server. The samba box is a member of the w2k domain (ADS). When I try to access the file via nfs I get "no such file or directory". In the logs I get the following error: ug 29 03:38:04 bfs kernel: smb_open: District of Columbia/lexis_com(SM) Get a Document - by Citation - D_C_ Code ^U

Good suggestion for sshguard. pjwelsh https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Sshguard http://www.funtoo.org/Package:Sshguard There you go, I give permission to cross license & plagiarize my *ntoo content to centos's wiki. it should be very similar to a cent box except for yum install sshguard && chkconfig sshguard (or however that ones done) && service sshguard start -sixsixsix

On 11/04/2019 11:43, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: > A. With the fail2ban solution > - you 'solve' that the current ip is not able to access you It is only a solution if there are subsequent attempts from the same address. I currently have several thousand addresses blocked due to dovecot login failures. My firewall is set to log these so I can see that few repeat, those

Good Morning I want to perform a synthetic control method with R. For this purpose, I created the following code: # Re-load packages library(Synth) library(readxl) # Pfadeinstellung Excel-Blatt excel_file_path <- ("C:\\Users\\xxxxx\\Desktop\\DATA_INVESTMENTVOLUMEN_FOR_R_WITHOUT_NA.xlsx") # Load the Excel file INVESTMENTVOLUME <- read_excel(excel_file_path) #

Another good one is http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/ It runs as a daemon, and can either ban IP's addresses all together, or just ban certain services. -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Brian Marshall Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:33 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: IPTables

Just to add another alternative while we're discussing the subject, I've got a soft spot for CSF as a replacement for fail2ban, and it has a lot of additional features as well. https://www.configserver.com/cp/csf.html P. On 22/05/2020 18.32, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2020 23:22:04 -0700, lists stated: >> I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm