similar to: No subject

with an active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

1. Does "Wrap-Up-Time" apply to all queue agents/extensions that just rang,= or only the one who actually answered the call (I assume the latter)? 2. Does the "Member Delay" delay the ringing of new calls to agents, or onl= y come into play AFTER the agent answers the ringing call? Any other suggestions for how I can resolve this issue? I am wondering whet= her "Agent

I am wondering if anyone knows of a way to do this, as it would be much more meaningful for our CDR reports. We use FreePBX under the Elastix distro. We are able to set the CALLER's CID on inbound calls by using the "Asterisk Phonebook" module in FreePBX, then configure the Inbound Route settings to use it for CID. I haven't seen anything like this to apply those same rules to

Hi, I currently have some systems on AsteriskNOW 1.7 & have been happy with its clean simplicity & reliability. Are many people here using AsteriskNOW 2.0.x? How do you feel about it? Did Digium stick with their previous philosophy of keeping everything very vanilla & making it clean & simple for someone who understands how to manage CentOS, FreePBX, tftp, ntpd, etc. but

Hello everyone. I am wondering whether there is a certain technique I should use to identify all log lines in the asterisk/full logfile that are related to a single call. If a user reports that something strange happened with a certain call, I'd like to be able to easily go back and look at the asterisk/full logfile, and look at only the lines that are relevant. I am having some difficulty

Any ideas on why callers who call into my customer's SIP trunk are not hearing a ringback tone? I had this on one other asterisk system, and wound up needing to set progressinband=yes in the SIP trunk config. I have set this on the current system & restarted asterisk, but to no avail. I am using: AsteriskNOW distro Asterisk build is 1.6 from AsteriskNOW repository:

Every so often, I have an asterisk 1.4.22-4 system that goes into an endless loop with the following: [Jun 1 13:30:44] VERBOSE[13160] logger.c: -- Playing 'dir-nomatch' (escape_digits=) (sample_offset 0) [Jun 1 13:30:44] WARNING[13160] file.c: Failed to write frame [Jun 1 13:30:44] WARNING[13160] file.c: Failed to write frame [Jun 1 13:30:44] VERBOSE[13160] logger.c: -- Playing

What are the pros and cons of both? Especially in regards to performance, stability, management & maintenance? I really appreciate feedback. We're on a time-crunch to migrate from a debian 5 box w/ dovecot 1.1 to a debian 6 box w/ dovecot 2.0.9 (built from source). Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ .

Today I found our dovecot 2.x gracefully logged: dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped I am confident that we had the very same problem on our previous dovecot 1.x box. Of course with dovecot 1.x, the same relative setting is login_max_processes_count. I believe that I turned up all dovecot logging & debugging to the max

Now that we've hashed out some thoughts on the most stable version of asterisk, I'd like to ask the question as to why I should NOT use 1.8? What are specific reasons? For instance a few days back I was speaking with James at Rhino Equipment. He said that he has "no real data" on why I shouldn't use 1.8. They just follow a practice of not jumping on the newest version. But I

Today I found out we are having users w/ problems because: Mar 3 09:57:33 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 09:58:42 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 10:02:51 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login):

This morning on our newly built server, the following was logged twice: auth: Error: pam(username,127.0.0.1): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) This also happened to be during a time of 100+ imap-login processes, where we were seeing: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped The initial error

Hello. I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an AGI script. We are having problems getting it to stream files. From what we can tell, it is talking to asterisk correctly when called from the dial plan. Its stderr output goes to the asterisk console. But asterisk doesn't give any indication that it receives the STREAM FILE command. Asterisk simply quickly

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone doing this? I think that ideally, rather than full-disk encryption, we should use an encryption that

I am interested in IMAP Voicemail storage for some of my customers. Does anyone know of any vendors of asterisk appliances (physical PBXs) that provide this as a "standard feature" (or an optional standard feature)? Ultimately, I'd like to be able to have a single point of accountability for the system as a whole. I would like an intuitive & powerful configuration GUI (such as

Hi All, I have a telephony project for which I need to build a prototype to demo for management. The prototype must work on a GSM phone network. In the demo system, a call from GSM phone comes into the demo box. The demo box runs CallWeaver. Callweaver picks up the GSM call, answers it and plays a sould file, then dials out to a second GSM phone somewhere and connects them so they talk. My

To: Twin Cities Asterisk Users From: asterisk_help at iwishi.nu Subject: TwinCities Asterisk Users Group Meeting this Saturday - Only 1 and 1/2 days away! Meeting Start: 09/08/2007 - 11:30am Hello all Twin Cities Asterisk Users, It's time once again to have another meeting. I've not had much time to prepare, but I'd really like to review and install with the group at our next

Hi list, I'm evaluating a private telephony scenario of about 20 locations - 300 phones, 50 FAX machines. Initial overview points to the installation of asterisk at three locations connected to the PSTN via ISDN PRI. All other locations, small by themselves, would get SIP phones managed by asterisk, since there is good IP connectivity between all sites. Now on to the

I personally didn't mind a one-time notice from the dev's team that that are now offering paid commercial support. What if I WANTED it? I felt like it was a courtesy email from them to let me know that it's available. If those emails continue unsolicited, then it may start to feel like spam to me, but this did not. In general, I've actually been looking for ways to financially