similar to: Asterisk fail over. From IP rewrite issues

So i successfully upgraded my Debian vm''s to Debian 6 on XCP 1.0, but when i try to install a new clean one it always fails. Why is this? The VM won''t even start, while i used the Debian 6 squeeze template. Is this even possible? Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hey, Is it possible to covert a .img to a xva? I have a virtual machine on a xen machine that i would like to run in a xen cloud. I used the xva.py and it gave me a xva + kernel i followed the copy instructions but i get this: [root@box ~]# xe vm-start vm=converted Error code: WARNING: /dev/xvda is not a disk image Error parameters: Traceback (most recent call last):, File

Hey, Is it possible to covert a .img to a xva? I have a virtual machine on a xen machine that i would like to run in a xen cloud. I used the xva.py and it gave me a xva + kernel i followed the copy instructions but i get this: [root@box ~]# xe vm-start vm=converted Error code: WARNING: /dev/xvda is not a disk image Error parameters: Traceback (most recent call last):, File

hello guys, i was wondering where and if i can find the xen kernel headers for the latest stable XCP (0.5) i need these because i have to compile a kernel module. Thanks! Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I would like to use the from caller id, to allow calls yes or no. 101, and 111 should be allowed to use the Trunk, the rest of the phones are not. Is this even possible? So if the from caller id is 101 or 111, then allow the call, otherwise hangup. Thanks, Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I was wondering if the following was possible: When somebody sends a fax to my direct number 0101234567105 (my extension will be 105) is it possible that Asterisk, or an addon sees this as a fax, and e-mail the fax to me? So everybody with a private extension will be able to receive faxes in his e-mailbox on his direct number. Any pointers would be highly appreciated! Thanks, Peter

Hi, I'm using the default Asterisk function Monitor to record calls, but i have some issue's with this, the problem is when a call is finished, it never mix in & out together, bellow you can see my call configuration: exten => _8.,1,Monitor(wav,${EXTEN},m) exten => _8.,n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1}@${EXTEN:1}) (the 8 prefix is due to testing of the system) The reason you see the

hi. Are you add only 0.0.0.0/1 as route, not 128.0.0.0/1 too? Did you tried to add route to 5.6.7.8 via C with lesser metric then via B? If you have to add static routes only on a few servers, you can add them to the $HOST-up scripts. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Zhang Jun <gb2313 at gmail.com> wrote: > my network: > > local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A(

Hi, I would like to create backups of running VM''s, is this possible? I found the backup, restore and update function in xsconsole but i can''t backup whole VM''s. I would like to do nightly back-ups of running VM''s on a diffrent server and i was working on a script for this, but i wonder if this is even possible! Thanks, Peter

Hello, i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the incoming device Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? Greeting J

Hello all, I am trying to set up asterisk and hylafax to send and receibe fax. The machine is connected to the PSTN is an Eicon Diva BRI (1 BRI port). My problem is that , when I send a Fax from the PSTN to this machine, the asterisk or diva or hylafax, does not detect this call as a fax and asterisk answer that call like a voice call. How sould I configure the software modem (iaxmodem) to use

my network: local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A( 192.168.1.1/24&11.22.33.44pppoe&10.10.10.1/24 tinc)<---remote B: 10.10.20.1/24 ^ | remote C:10.10.0.1/24 all running tinc 1.0.x, ADSL router

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

Hi guys, I upgraded my home server to check out XCP 1.0 but i have a big problem. After the upgrade my network just died. I see the card, it''s listed as xenbr0 but there is no network acces/connection going over it. A ping to or from the server results in nothing. When i check out the configure managment interface settings i see the NIC, and it states connected. But there is no way to

On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > > On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >> gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the >> incoming device " > > I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and > everything that Gordon (and

I may not understood\interpreted the scenario pretty well. I will try again: "i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices." He has two servers or two gateways or both?? "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the incoming device " How to interpret this sentence??? The scenario I can

> Hi Folks, > > I have a situation where my Colo insists on a particular IP setup > for my * server box. They allocate two blocks of IPs to my colo > server. One set as my own (ex 20.20.20.20.4/30 - 4 ips) and the > other as a transit lan (es 10.10.10.0/29). These are all public > IP addresses and there is no NAT involved in. > > So essentially I have to set-up IP

On 12/25/2015 12:44 PM, Joey wrote: > > i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. > > I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default > gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the > incoming device > > Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? No you can not do that via firewalld or iptables. The problem is

On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default > gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the > incoming device " I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and everything that Gordon (and I mentioned in my first post) is accurate. This is a routing problem not

Hello, i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default routes solve my problem perfect. Thank you all. J Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: >> >> On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >>> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >>> gateway.