similar to: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Amatix Office 2.0

Hello I want to setup an Asterisk in several offices with 4 BRI ISDN. I am looking for recommendations on hardware. Criteria would be ease of setup, reliability and cost. The Eicon 4 BRI cards seem fairly pricey. Shame Digium don't do a ISDN BRI card. Angus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone done any integration with this? All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP. Any pointers? - -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director _______________________________________________ http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution) http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News -

On 18 Sep 2017, at 20.12, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > Am 18.09.17 um 12:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >> On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org <mailto:rb at egroupware.org> >> <mailto:rb at egroupware.org <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>>> wrote: >>>

On 07/02/2019 11:14 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>>>> On

On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>>>

On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: > > Am 14.09.17 um 01:07 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17.42, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >>> Dovecot 2.2.31 with mailboxes in mdbox format. >>> >>> Since a couple of days some

On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote:

On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >>>> >>>> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc.

On 02/07/2019 16:20, Zombie Ryushu wrote: > On 07/02/2019 11:14 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>> On

Hi Timo, Am 18.09.17 um 12:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org > <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >> >> Am 14.09.17 um 01:07 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17.42, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org >>> <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >>>> Dovecot

Quick question: Is there a way to distinguish between calling MSN's when using chan_misdn? More info: I've got my ISDN2 (EuroISDN) up and running here in Romania with 1 base number plus 5 MSN's. Now I want to my * to do different things when receiving a call on from different MSN's (like forwarding the call to my FAX machine or forwarding the call to my mobile). The obvious way

Hi Timo, update to 2.2.32 (suggested by Aki) did not change the situation ... Am 18.09.17 um 20:49 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 18 Sep 2017, at 20.12, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org > <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Timo, >> >> Am 18.09.17 um 12:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >>> On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at

> On 03/08/2020 22:58 Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org> wrote: > > > Some answers to my questions, a first version of my script and more questions ;) > > Am 03.08.20 um 18:15 schrieb Ralf Becker: > > Currently looking into the following questions: > > > > > > - can I get the rfc 5423 type of event somehow (obviously I can set it on the event

On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >> >> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >> SID rather than the UID Number. > > If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you

I found a way to reproduce the problem :) Use an arbitrary mailbox (maybe my Dovecot config with mdbox etc. required). Then use Thunderbird (52.9.1 on Mac) to create eg. the following folder (without the quotes!): ??? "[Test / Test]" This is a space, a slash and a space between the Test in square brackets. TB now creates the following two folders: 1. "INBOX/[Test " (not

On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >> >> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >> SID rather than the UID Number. > > If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you

On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: > On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>

On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: > On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>> On

On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: > On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >>> >>> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >>> SID rather than the UID

One more update, I tried renaming that "[Test " folder to just "Test", which creates an also not deletable folder "Test". Good news is, if I delete these folders on both replication nodes from mdbox/mailboxes and mdbox/subscriptions they seem to be really gone. I can event create the folder "Test" again and it behaves normal aka. I can delete it afterwards