similar to: Asterisk 1.6 T38 to G711 transcoding is this possible?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Asterisk 1.6 T38 to G711 transcoding is this possible?"

2011 Oct 06
3
Digium FFA + Gafachi T38 outgoing issues
Hi, folks. I'm having a heck of a time trying to get outgoing T38 faxing (I don't need inbound right now) working with FFA and Gafachi. G711 faxing works (as well as can be expected over the internet), but I want the higher reliability of T38. I'm running Asterisk 10-beta1. When I drop my callfile in to make the call, I get this: -- Attempting call on SIP/18884732963 at
2010 May 18
2
Asterisk 1.4.30 & T38
Hello list, I read on voip-info.org that Asterisk 1.4 support T38 passthrough. So I guess this means that I can have a Grandstream HT503 with T38 support and an analogue faxmachine on the other side of my Asterisk and a T38-account with a ITSP on the other side of my Asterisk machine, right ?! The fax coming from the faxmachine passes the HT503 to my Asterisk and my Asterisk sends the fax to
2005 Sep 29
1
SIP Gateway wants T38, Asterisk rejects but media path not established.
Disclaimer: Yes, I know faxing over G711 is unreliable. :-) We're running Asterisk 1.0.9 which talks to a Audiocodes SIP Gateway. We're running Sipura SPA-2002's as ATA's and faxing within our own voice network is working. If we try and fax out to the world however, we're running into a problem. When the call connects and the modem tones begin to negotiate, our SIP/PSTN
2011 Mar 23
1
spa8000 t38 faxing
Hi I'm trying to get the spa 8000 used with a fax machine using t38 passthru i have tried with 1.6.2 and 1.8.3 and is still a no go the provider i use is 012 in israel wich supports t38 (i use it with ffa) could anybody give me a clue how to get this working if it should t38pt is set to yes in sip.conf Thanks, Israel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2006 Jan 27
2
WARNING: chan_sip.c:3470 process_sdp: Unknown SDP media type in offer: image 5004 udptl t38
Hi, I'm using asterisk 1.2.1. Is there anybody out there who knows what this warning means? *WARNING: chan_sip.c:3470 process_sdp: Unknown SDP media type in offer: image 5004 udptl t38* Google does not help at all. TIA Giorgio Incantalupo
2005 Oct 10
4
sip register incoming call contexts?
Sorry this is a bit of a newbie question, I've been at this for a few months and still have not quite figured this one out. I've been able to setup one itsp (incoming calls) (sip account) with a register line like this: register => nnnnnnn:ppppp@sip.provider.net -or- register => nnnnnnn:ppppp@sip.provider.net/nnn to come directly into an extension in the dialplan It seems that
2009 Nov 07
1
Asterisk 1.6.1 + Cisco AS5300 + Fax T38 ?
Hi I have finished the installation of my VoIP basic configuration ... Actually: - All calls from my E1 are received by a Cisco AS5300 and sent to my Asterisk (in G711 by SIP). - All user are connected by SIP to the Asterisk - All calls from User are sent by asterisk to the Cisco AS5300 Now, i want see if i can supply T38 Fax Gateway .... I am search to: - Cisco Receive all
2009 Jun 26
4
T38 Fax Gateway for Asterisk 1.6
Hi, I remember seeing a T38 Gateway application for Asterisk 1.6 floating around, but I can't seem to find it again. Does anyone have any pointers to it? I really want to be able to send an incoming T38 connection directly to the PSTN. Thanks. -- James
2009 Jan 20
5
the FXS ports of Digium and damaging if connected to Tel Line
Hi All; I am facing a problem that always the users confused and connect the telephone line coming from the telephone service provider to the FXS port and cause it to be damaged, specially if the card was 2 fxs and 2 fxo, so they make mistake and connect the line to fxs while it should be connected to fxo. What is the solution for this disaster? Regards Bilal
2010 Mar 17
3
SIP codec negotiation / manipulation
We're having an odd issue with codec negotiation from one of our SIP providers. Here's the basic situation. We receive an invite from them advertising support for G711, G729, and G723. In our response, we send back that we support G711 and G729. In about half the cases, this results in no problems, with audio being encoded with G711. The other half of the time, they send us a second
2009 Mar 16
2
t38 iax trunk
Hi all, I have a question regarding using T38 for fax sending and here is my scenario: fax -> SIP ATA (T38 enabled) -> Asterisk #1 -> IAX TRUNK -> Asterisk #2 -> SIP ATA (T38 enabled) -> fax My question is, how can I know if I'm really using T38? is T38 information coming to the other side (because of SIP to IAX conversion) or just plain g711a data? I'm using Linksys
2009 Oct 06
2
T38 REINVITe issue
Hi My call flow is T38 static IP gateway --> Asterisk --> Sip Provider--> PSTN Call is placed in reverse direction - from PSTN to T38 Gateway. T38 GW reinvites with T38, and asterisk passes it along to the SIP provider. The SIP provider challenges it and asterisk reponds to the Challenge with INVITE with Auth credentials...however, the Asterisk changes the SDP and replaces the T38
2006 Nov 15
2
T38 problem
I have problem with fax machine Panasonic DX600. It's connected to Grandstream Handy Tone 386 which is connected to Asterisk. Asterisk is connected to my SIP provider. To some numbers I can't send FAX, and I get following error on CLI. WARNING[2237] chan_sip.c: Unknown SDP media type in offer: image 31358 udptl t38 I believe that Panasonic DX600 machine supports T38. And when I have
2010 May 25
2
Little t38 bug?
Hello List, I think I've discovered a little bug in t.38 bug in 1.6.0.22 regarding the speed (T38MaxBitRate) used to send the faxes. Asterisk always responds with a=T38MaxBitRate:2400. I've tried with Patton and Grandstream devices and the result is always the same. Patton ignores the parameter and sends the fax at 9600.
2005 Mar 28
1
H323: g711-g729 transcoding
I have a connect to * via H.323/g711 from device A and want to connect to B which want for H.323/g729 h323.conf contains disallow=all allow=alaw allow=g729 but outgoing faststart/TCS contains only g711 (from h323_request(format) i think) and so no codec negotiation and no voice. Howto run up g711/H323 -> * -> g729/H323 PS intel's g729 was used. ast 1.0.3-6 PPS stupid -
2006 Nov 13
2
FAX using T38
Dear all, I'm trying to enable Asterisk to work with FAX using T38. I've tried Asterisk 1.2.4 with the available patch found at URL http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5090 and also with the new 1.4 Beta3 that is announced to support it too. With both Asterisk versions, I've sent with success FAXes between two FAX machines each one attached to an ATA interface, both registered in
2008 May 05
2
T38 Passthrough Verification
Hi All, I have 1.4.9.1 setup, with the compiler flags enabled for T38, and have a Mediatrix 2102 and a Linksys SPA 8000-G1. I can pass faxes between devices but can't seem to invoke T38 pt UDPTL. It's enabled in sip.conf [general] and well as the [peer]. I get an error at the CLI: WARNING[3096]: chan_sip.c:14149 handle_request_invite: RTP re-invite after T38 session not handled yet !
2006 Jan 13
2
ILBC to G711 transcoding experince ?
Hello All, Anyone here has experience of accepting a ilbc call and sending it on g711 or g729 I am having problem in VOICE , call goes though but there is no voice. Senario: Call is coming in from Machine A to Machine B, sending to Machine C Machine B is an asterisk box, transcoding it from IBLC to G711 and g729. Problem: Voice is not appearing on the sip user sitting on machine A Already
2010 Feb 20
1
Fax, T38 and NAT
Gentlemen, I have 3 faxes attached to an Asterisk. Fax - SPA2102 - Asterisk. 0851711201 and 0851711290 is on our WAN, no NAT. 0197673581 is outside our WAN and needs to be NAT'ed. Sending a fax from 0851711201 to 0851711290, no problem, switches to T38 and fax goes through. Sending a from 0197673581 to 0851711201, no problem as long as i dont enable T38 on 0197673581. But, if i enable T38
2006 Mar 15
1
Development news :: T38 passthrough
I found a bug in the latest T38 passthrough patches, the effect is that a non-SIP call after being put on hold is then lost, no resume is possible. The fix is to be applied in the chan_sip.c file: } else { /* No bridged peer with T38 enabled*/ transmit_response_with_sdp(p, "200 OK", req, 1); } - } + } else transmit_response_with_sdp(p, "200