similar to: Allison Smith, Music-on-Hold Parody--outstanding.

Somebody requested a path to listen without termination charges. Here's a SIP URI: (a SIP What??) karlonhold at sip.kfife.com or 3605195689 at 74.92.179.65 Thanks -Karl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090102/33b3bf7b/attachment.htm

Hi, Allison Smith continues to contribute to the open source asterisk resources and she is launching a new site that will make it even easier to grab sound files. Allison joins us to talk about that and whatever else comes up. She says: "I have been the Voice of Asterisk -- the world's fastest-growing telephony platform -- since its inception (which for me, was marked by an animated

If you missed @voicegal last time or didn't go to Astricon, join us today on the Voip Users Conference to meet Allison Smith, the voice of Asterisk. Or go listen to the FBI talk about security... http://VoipUsersConference.org for details. /r

Greetings and salutations Asterisk community, I've been contacted by a man who has generously posted some prompts he commissioned from Allison Smith. If you haven't heard Allison in humor mode, you owe it to yourself to hear this. Joey Lindstrom has decided to place these in the public domain and he's asking Digium to include them in the Asterisk prompts collection. Because he's

For anyone interested, Allison Smith's AMA (not sure she's still around): http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2rrb7m/iama_professional_telephone_voice_ama/ -- Jeremy Kister http://jeremy.kister.net./

I'm sending in a set of voiceover requests to Allison Smith this afternoon. I haven't kept up with the -users list to know if there is someone keeping track of this stuff any more... We only have a few phrases for her to record, and if anyone has applications which require Allison's voice for the "asterisk-sounds" repository, let me know. I'll be sending this in

yes, i've read the online docs and followed a link or two to find a simple way to do this, such as: http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/SystemTapOnCentOS so, these days, is that the canonical way to download source rpms? now, note that i'm not arguing about whether this is a good idea. in my circumstances, i want the ability to just "yum download" source rpms so that i can

Hi all, Disregard my previous posts, I've consolidated everything here. I'm having terrible performance issues with samba over a WAN (point-to-point T1 link). Doing a copy of a 2MB file from a samba server to a linux client running smbclient takes over 5 minutes. SCPing the same file takes seconds. The server is running samba version 3.0.25c with kernel 2.6.16.18. I've put up a set

Is there a way to use full information maximum likelihood (FIML) to estimate missing data in the sem package? For example, suppose I have a dataset with complete information on X1-X3, but missing data (MAR) on X4. Is there a way to use FIML in this case? I know lavaan and openmx allow you to do it, but I couldn't find anything in the documentation for the sem package. Thanks! -- Dustin Fife

Let me start with an example: par(mfrow=c(2,3)) for (i in 1:5){ x = rnorm(100) y = .5*x + rnorm(100, 0, sqrt(1-.5^2)) plot(x,y) } Note that there's five plots and six spaces for those plots via mfrow, leaving one row empty. Is there a way to have the bottom two plots centered? I think it looks weird to have them left-justified. Thanks in advance for the help! -- Dustin Fife PhD

Hi all, I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses. One of the fields in my LDAP entries contains the canonical name of the server that hosts their mailbox, and if I follow the manual at

Forgive me if this is a trivial question, but I couldn't find it an answer in former forums. I'm trying to reproduce some SAS results where they set two parameters equal. For example: y = b1X1 + b2X2 + b1X3 Notice that the variables X1 and X3 both have the same slope and the intercept has been removed. How do I get an estimate of this regression model? I know how to remove the intercept

I notice that the installation of Asterisk 1.8.8 thru 1.8.10 (probably earlier versions too) remove the group write permissions from /etc/asterisk/. which is different than 1.4. And 1.6. Is this expected behavior? If so, what's the rationale? If not, I'll submit a bug report if someone hasn't beaten me to it. -K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hey folks, I've been getting requests from the users that they want the OCFS2 filesystems aligned to 64k boundaries, however, when I began the project, the dummy of me, created the OCFS2 filesystem on top of the whole disk device (no partition) for example, one of the SAN devices would show up as /dev/dm-10, I created the filesystem using the following command: mkfs.ocfs2 -L SOMELABEL

I was writing my blob at http://railsblob.blogspot.com/ which is for new people who are new to Rubby and I was learning if Mongril or Lighthttttp? or Web Rick is better for me. Have you any advice. Thanks? Rails Blobber -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Does anyone know enough about the implementation of AstDB to know whether the data structure is a Hash function, a Balanced-Tree, a b-Tree, or a Linked List? I'm trying to estimate the lookup 'cost' of a AstDB with around 160,000 keys? Obviously I already know that it WILL WORK, but the question is whether the data structure is optimal in the Berkeley DB AS IMPLEMENTED in Asterisk.

I have a Sipura 962 endpoint on Asterisk 1.4 where the MWI works perfectly, however my theory is that it should be broken. Obviously I'm wrong but "Sip show subscriptions" does not show the endpoint subscribing to the MWI status on Asterisk, even though all of the other endpoints on the system DO subscribe for their respective mailboxes, including SNOM & Polycom endpoints.

Again no apparent explanation for the split except hysterical raisins. Merging them also makes it a bit more obviuos what's going on wrt the runtime pm refdancing. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1

Again no apparent explanation for the split except hysterical raisins. Merging them also makes it a bit more obviuos what's going on wrt the runtime pm refdancing. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau at arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

Anybody care to muse on Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT? My limited research indicates that none of the WiSip phones will ever be able to match the performance of DECT phones. Maybe I'm wrong but a Wi-SIP phone seems like a DIESEL sports car. There is nothing wrong with the technology, but it seems like a shoe-horned fit into the requirements of a wireless endpoint. DECT uses a wireless radio layer