similar to: Priority between calls from different queues

I'm trying to create a language structure that is a call to a function with a number of arguments that is only known at run time. I do this by using repeated indices to expand out a call with a single argument. However, when I change one of the arguments, all are changed. I don't see the same behavior when I initially create a call with multiple arguments. Even more strangely,

On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > However it seems that if a landingpad-block has multiple predecessors (often the case, > multiple InvokeInst in the main body of a try-statement all go to the same landingpad- > block), then you cannot move the LandingpadInst in order to break a critical edge unless > you do it for _all_ landingpad-block predecessor edges

After I spend some time working with the function attribute* deduction pass** [1,3], I would like to propose a "proper" organization***. Why? Because we do not derive nearly as many attributes as we could****, while we do maintain various (separate and diffently organized) "data-flow-like analyses" to do so. What else? I propose a single optimistic data-flow

Hi I am using LLVM to help me do some code analysis. I wrote a LLVM Function Pass to help me to generate some information. I use the code below to get the source line information for every instruction. for (BasicBlock &BB : F){ for(Instruction &I: BB){ DILocation* Loc = I.getDebugLoc().get(); unsigned Line = Loc->getLine() } } I think the function's first

Ex-girlfriend logic not working in latest CVS? Incoming sip calls don't work. Anyone else seen this problem? Extension logic looks good: exten => 6153248305/_931NXXXXXXX,1,Queue(queue1); exten => 6153248305/_615NXXXXXXX,1,Queue(queue2); ;exten => 6153248305,1,Queue(queue3); show dialplan looks good: -- Added extension '6153248305' priority 1 (CID match

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:25 AM Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi > > I am using LLVM to help me do some code analysis. I wrote a LLVM Function > Pass to help me to generate some information. I use the code below to get > the source line information for every instruction. > > for (BasicBlock &BB : F){ > for(Instruction &I:

Hi, Well, in our case, it seems that the issue was being caused by announcements. That is, someone in QUEUE1 would be waiting 15 minutes.. and QUEUE2 would be waiting 5 minutes. The person in QUEUE1 would be listening to 'we're sorry you are holding so long, if you'd like to leave a message, press 1 now.. otherwise continue to hold'... and while they were listening to that an

Hi David Thank you very much for your suggestions. ScopeLine works well. It could represent the start of a function. Do you know whether I can get the start column of this function? Many Thanks Regards Muhui 2018-05-30 3:25 GMT+08:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:25 AM Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

I want callers to go into the queue(s) and just hear ringing instead of MOH. Is this possible? exten => 200,1,Ringing() exten => 200,n,Queue(queue1|t|||15) exten => 200,n,Queue(queue2|t|||15) It looks to me like MOH is built-in to the queue, but if anybody knows otherwise please speak up!

Guys, on second thought... doesn't making the exception registers live from the InvokeInst to the LandingpadInst create problems for critical-edge-splitting ? if a landingpad-edge is critical and needs to be split, won't we be creating and inserting a new BB between the "invoke-block" and the "landingpad-block", and if we do then isn't there the

I have a centrally located shared imap folder location. We have several maildir folders with different file system permissions. They are for several groups of people who are loosely related for support purposes. All mail gets delivered to queue1 just fine. The files are group writable by group1. Some of the mail gets moved via imap to queue2. Queue2's maildir tree is configured with

Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 So I tried to figure out when the above instruction occurred. When <stdlib.h> is included, free(buf2R1); turn into call void @free(i8* %call1) nounwind, !dbg !16 when I forget to include <stdlib.h>, free(buf2R1); turn into %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32

if you don't include stdlib.h, where free() is declared, you'll simply get a default C function signature: int free(...); On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jane <270611649 at qq.com> wrote: > Thanks. isFreeCall() works well but for > %call2 = call i32 bitcast (i32 (...)* @free to i32 (i8*)*)(i8* %call1) > nounwind, !dbg !16 > So I tried to figure out when the above

Hi, I''m trying to use HTB for IPv6 packets. In the LARTC archive I found a thread on this issue where a solution was described. The idea is to mark a user-defined chain then use the fwmark for filtering. However my attempt wasn''t successful. I''m thinking of trying my luck with the u32 filter. This is what I did, any comment is greatly appreciated. Thank you all. tc

Hi, I want to edit LLVM generated IR file, like as given below, Original LLVM IR file, @.str2 = private unnamed_addr constant [17 x i8] c"\0AI am in one_11\0A\00", align 1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i32 @one_1(i32 %ivar1, i32 %ivar2) #0 { entry: %ivar1.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %ivar2.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %isum = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %ivar1, i32*

Hi, I want to call/add some functions(that defined in another file) on top of some functions, and reflect the same changes in object file. No, I am not looking for contractor. Thanks, Deepika On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > What is the condition for adding this code? > > What have you tried so far? [Or are you looking for a

Hi, Again, sorry for the length of this post. Once I get my new office I will get a website set up on my work machine and will simply post a link to the log since I doubt many people are truly interested in these logs. To further analyze what is happening, I added my own routine in main.c called DEBUG_SET_NAMED and then redefined the SET_NAMED macro to use it and then rebuilt R. I

I''m having a problem with multiple Ajax.Updater instances. I have five small chunks of data being loaded into my homepage, and they seem to be firing off one at a time. So the pieces load up in the order they were called. Maybe I''m being a noob, but shouldn''t all those requests just fire away and then place the content as it gets received? I was doing multiple versions,

Hi, Yes I am looking for IR pass that will do insert call of functions that defined in another file. Links/suggestions that guide me to start for adding IR pass will help me so much. Regards, Deepika On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > So how do you know what you want to modify (conceptually)? > > Have you got a IR pass that you

Hi Ralph, On 17/06/2012 23:04, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Sun 17 Jun 2012 01:44:32 PM PDT, Parisson wrote: > >> A few months ago, when you released libshout 2.3.0, you talked about a hacked >> version of shout2send plugin for GStreamer. As I also use GStreamer to stream >> live, could you please share your patch so that I can test it against Icecast >> trunk and some