similar to: OT: reverse DNS error for lists.digium.com

Hi all, I would like to announce the first release of the chan_capi channel driver on sourceforge.net The package is available for download with name chan_capi-cm-0.5 and is the current CVS HEAD. It is derived from the chan_capi-0.4.0PRE1 of kapejod. The main changes are: - complete rework - fix race-conditions - fix call state handling - rework of debug/verbose messages - added capiFax

On 2/14/20 2:23 PM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:05, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: >>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: >>> >>> ??? Hello! > > [?] > >>> For our new setup (planned with CentOS 8, waiting for the official repo for the latest dovecot >>>

Hello configuration as follows, dial-out works: capi.conf: [hfcpci] ;;PointToPoint (55512-0) isdnmode=MSN incomingmsn=* ;msn=61 controller=1 devices=2 context=incoming extensions.conf: [incoming] exten => _XX,1,Playback(demo-abouttotry) exten => _XX,n,Dial,SIP/xlite1 exten => _XX,n,HangUp When call is placed, the following debug info is shown, after the last line, it stalls until

Hi all, it took a while, but on sourceforge.net I added the new release 0.6 of chan_capi-cm driver. Note: dial string and capi.conf has changed. The main changes are: - added 'relaxdtmf'. - more BSD compatibility - correct PROGRESS handling - added verbose text for capi info/reason error messages. - use correct facility-selector for echo-cancel - added application capicommand() for CAPI

On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > > Hello! > > we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue > for that migration. > With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like > shared/project-xyz > but the email address for direct

Can someone share pointers to Asterisk's Dialogic support? Which boards are supported, driver status, and etc. Thnx

Hi all, I use asterisk cvs-head from last week and was wondering why my macros are not working like I expected. A macro will be aborted if one application returns error (-1), but some applications (like ChanIsAvail() in my case) do return -1. So when I want to use ChanIsAvail() in a macro, it does not work if the channel is not available, because the macro is not executed on n+101. The macro

Hello all, we are using tinc 1.0.24 with 6 hosts (endpoints). Quality of service is used with prio qdisc on all network interfaces. This means depending on the TOS value of the IP header IP-packets will get a priority queue on the network interface. Packets from TINC (UDP 655) maybe reordered using these queues to send out high-prio (VoIP) packets first. Could this create a problem on the

Hello, I''m trying to compile Xen unstable on NetBSD, I''ve aplied the patches from http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/patches/?only_with_tag=MAIN and copied the blk files from http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/files/?only_with_tag=MAIN (I don''t know which of these patches have been applied to xen unstable, so

Hello all, we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we have packet loss between those direct connections. To avoid this direct connection, I would like to tell TINC to use a defined other host to route the packets to. E.g. instead of doing direct

On 30.08.2016 17:37, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. >> Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection >> between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we >> have packet loss between those direct connections.

Hello Armin, > The card is telling: > > CAPI INFO 0x34a2: No circuit / channel available > > so the other channel must be in use by something else. > Maybe another device on the ISDN line? > I have tested it several times now and always entered "capi info" before and after the call. The answer was always: Contr1: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. I'm

Hello Armin, hello List I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2). I managed to get it compiled by providing my own version of ast_copy_string. This is an Austrian PTP line. I can do outgoing calls fine (no comprehensive tests yet). For incoming calls, I'm getting "No answer" on the

Hello! we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue for that migration. With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like shared/project-xyz but the email address for direct delivery to that folder my be different (not project-xyz at domain.com). With dovecot we try to have it similar (at least how the user sees it in the client) like it

On 14.02.2020 11:44, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: ... > > The sorting in the according public folder happens in a global sieve > script before user scripts are fireing. It is combined with the ?+? > notation in postfix for sub addresses and an special ?listadm? user > > postfix: > | > listadm+Verteiler/info@$DOMAIN > |

Hello, I have two servers (A and B) in separate locations. Both are connected together via two tinc switches to provide two subnets on both servers. This works pretty good. I can start my VMs on any server connected to one of those bridges without changing any routes. The subnets hosted on both servers (each in a bridge) are 172.16.10.0/24 (mainly on A) and 172.16.11.0/24 (mainly on B) Now I

Hello, These are error messages I get when I try to call a number over CAPI channel. -- Executing SetCallerID("SIP/xlite1-3b80", "0") in new stack -- Executing Dial("SIP/xlite1-3b80", "CAPI/hfcpci/b17") in new stack > data = hfcpci/b17 > capi request for interface 'hfcpci' == hfcpci: Call CAPI/hfcpci/b17-1 (pres=0x00,

I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS resolution is a little slow. I'm looking into why that is and tried an ns lookup for google.com and got the answer SERVFAIL on my AD server. The query was then passed to my next nameserver (google's own dns), which handled the query. Is this correct behaviour? I've not seen SERVFAIL before itadmin at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Guus, On 04/30/2015 03:42 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:55:59PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> we are using tinc 1.0.24 with 6 hosts (endpoints). Quality of service >> is used with prio qdisc on all network interfaces. This means depending >> on the TOS value of the IP header IP-packets will

Hello, I just received a couple SX440isdn phones and was wondering if they can be plugged into a Diva 4BRI port in NT mode and work with asterisk+chan_capi? I know they probably work fine with mutliHFC cards with either bristuff of chan_misdn but since I have some spare Divas, I was curious about their potential as phone ports. The Diva's 3 and 4 ports are already set to NT mode at boot