similar to: SIP Channel jitter buffer issue

> We just return a frame with the return value JB_DROP, which tells the > caller to drop this frame, and call jb_get again. > > When the caller is done with the jitterbuffer, it calls jb_getall() > repeatedly, until it's empty, and then it can discard all the frames. Hmm, looks a bit error-prone to me. Especially considering I still have to explain that "no, you

> Yes. Jean-Marc has made the API more similar. > > Jean-Marc: Have you looked at the API we have for the > asterisk/iaxclient jitterbuffer? Just did. > It's pretty close to what you have now -- the major difference is that > your jb still assumes it can "own" the data passed in -- it copies it, > and it destroys it at will. With the API I put together,

On May 3, 2006, at 7:40 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > >> Yes. Jean-Marc has made the API more similar. >> >> Jean-Marc: Have you looked at the API we have for the >> asterisk/iaxclient jitterbuffer? > > Just did. > >> It's pretty close to what you have now -- the major difference is >> that >> your jb still assumes it can

On May 3, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> We just return a frame with the return value JB_DROP, which tells the >> caller to drop this frame, and call jb_get again. >> >> When the caller is done with the jitterbuffer, it calls jb_getall() >> repeatedly, until it's empty, and then it can discard all the frames. > > Hmm, looks a bit error-prone to

Hi Guys I have a 4 port PRI card that I need to setup each port in their own group. In chan_dahdi.conf I have the following which works for one port How do I add the rest of the ports in their own groups so that I can have different signaling on each? [channels] language=en switchtype=euroisdn pridialplan=unknown resetinterval=600 echocancel=yes echotraining=yes

We have a customer on a wireless connection that has very bad jitter. They can hear people fine, but people have a very hard time hearing them. They are connected via a SPA-2102. It is a SIP client going to a SIP trunk. Something like this in sip.conf [general] would be in effect for all SIP clients: jbenable = yes jbmaxsize = 150 jbresyncthreshold = 1000 jbimpl = fixed jblog = yes I only want

Hi All; Can I run the IAX on TCP port instead of UDP port? If I ran IAX in TCP port, and in case my network was having a lot of users doing browse on the internet and downloading, so in that case and if the IAX used TCP port, so the voice will be better than using UDP (because in TCP the lost packets will be resend while in TCP it will not which will cause the voice to be cutting)? Same thing

Hi Mayur, > On 24 Nov 2014, at 07:00, MAYUR PANDEY <mayur.p at samsung.com> wrote: > In the assembly generated with O0, we are getting the "blx" instruction whereas with O1 we get "bx" (in 3.4.2 we used to get "blx" for both O0 and O1). > > Is this because of this patch: [llvm] r214959 - ARM: do not generate BLX instructions on Cortex-M CPUs

4 Port PRI sangoma a104 From: jg [mailto:webaccounts173 at jgoettgens.de] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:09 PM To: Andrew Colin; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 4 Port PRI I have a 4 port PRI card that I need to setup each port in their own group. In chan_dahdi.conf I have the following which works for one port How do I add the rest

Hi all, Are there any scale limitations in terms of how many nodes can be in a single Gluster Cluster or how much storage capacity can be managed in a single cluster? What are some of the large deployments out there that you know of? Thanks, Mayur ***************************Legal Disclaimer*************************** "This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for

Hi, This is regarding a TODO mentioned in getIdentityValue function in InstructionCombining.cpp file. //TODO: We can handle other cases e.g. Instruction::And, Instruction::Or etc. I wanted to know what could be the use cases of implementing these. When I tried implementing these and wrote test cases for the same, the test cases would be optimized in InstructionSimplify before hitting the code

Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe some difference in parsing is there. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > >> for the following

Hi, do you have NAT between Asterisk and agent phones? S pozdravem Tomáš Holý Hi Tomas Thanks for replying. Yes, the phones are in one location in a LAN and are then NATed to enable them to contact the Asterisk which is hosted in the cloud. A typical sip.conf phone configuration on the remote server for the site is [general] session-timers=refuse disallow=all allow=g729:20 allow=ulaw

For the given test: class A1 { int x; int y; public: A1(int a, int b) { x=a; y=b; } A1 operator+(const A1&); }; A1 A1::operator+(const A1& second) { A1 sum(0,0); sum.x = x + second.x; sum.y = y + second.y; return (sum); } int main (void) { A1 one(2,3); A1 two(4,5); return 0; } when the exectable of this code is debugged in gdb for i386, we dont get the

I'm not really an overload resolution expert, so I could be wrong. Anyway, please file a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs/), and our overload resolution experts will take a look. :) -Eli On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. > And the part of code which you

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 at 03:32, Mayur Dewaikar <mdewaikar at commvault.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any scale limitations in terms of how many nodes can be in a > single Gluster Cluster or how much storage capacity can be managed in a > single cluster? What are some of the large deployments out there that you > know of? > > The current design of GlusterD is not

Hi, Structures are passed by pointer, so the return value is not actually in eax. That code gets transformed into something like: void sum(A1 *out, const A1 one, const A1 two) { out->x = one.x + two.x out->y = one.y + two.y } So actually the function ends up returning void and operating on a hidden parameter, so %eax is dead at the end of the function and should not be being relied

Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct value returning also. gdb while debugging expects the return value in eax, gcc does returns in eax, But Clang returns in edx(it can be checked in gdb by printing the contents of edx). Code(sample code) struct A1 { int x; int y; }; A1 sum(const A1 one, const A1 two) { A1 plus = {0,0}; plus.x = one.x + two.x; plus.y

Hi guys, I have a bunch grandstream phones using ulaw and my users are complaining they are jittery when I use "canreinvite=yes". The data connection is an ADSL link dedicated for phone traffic. At any given time, I have at most 2 calls in parallel. I'm not a huge fan of asterisk being in media path doing buffering because the delay (jbmaxsize=80,jbimpl=fixed) is pretty long and

for the following code: struct X { X(); }; struct Y { operator X() const; }; X a = { Y() }; // reports error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'X' X aa = Y(); // works fine clang when compiled with std=c++11 gives compilation errors as: testfile.C:11:3: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'X' X a = { Y() }; // reports error: no