similar to: noun-verb vs verb-noun aka dogs black vs black dogs

Xapians! If tomorrow Xapian search engine would achieved the same performance and result in searches as Google we would not be able to beat Google, because we would create only a copy of the searches that already exists from Google search engine. However there is a way to beat anyone, and there is a way to beat Google successfully as well just do not give up. Some see it as implementing Ajax, or

I''ve been looking into RESTful approaches lately. Everything I know my dog, Lelu, taught me. REST (REpresentational State Transfer) is an architectural technique for networked applications first described by Roy Fielding in his dissertation at UC Irvine-- excellent work, especially considering the tempting proximity of Newport Beach. As Lelu described it to me, REST strives

On 08/09/2016 03:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:04:04 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:21:53 -0300 >>> francis picabia via samba <samba at

hey all, I'm just getting used to R and i'm having issues when it comes to reading my data in rows rather than columns. any good advice would be much appreciated ! here is the error: > data1 <- read.table(file.choose(),header=T) > x1 <- c(data1[1,1:5]) > shapiro.test(x1) Error in sort.int(x, na.last = na.last, decreasing = decreasing, ...) : 'x' must be atomic

The default verb for match is :any. This means for: match ''dog/bark(/:num)'' => ''dogs#bark'' # get 3 barks match ''dog/eat'' => ''dogs#eat'' # post breakfast someone could post on dog/bark with :louder or get on dog/eat with :breakfast. This is annoying and messy, and definitely not RESTful. In moving to Rails 3,

> On 2015-Jun-15, at 16:29, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > I like this colour: > > enum class AliasKind /* or AliasCategory? */ { > Null, > Unknown, > Partial, > Complete > }; > > So, the only

The coding guidelines say: > Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()). This means that functions that just compute or access a value (no side-effects) should be named e.g. `getParent()`, rather than `parent()` as they are in

Hello all, I am new to the list, but I have been using ferret for a little bit already. I would first like to thank Dave for all his work on ferret. I had a few questions that I haven''t been able to figure out after messing around with ferret and going through the documentation. StemFilter ------ I am trying to improve the quality of my searches in context of the content of my

> On 24 May 2018, at 20:19, Sam McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The coding guidelines say: > > Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()). > > This means that functions that

Hi, Apologies if this has been answered before. I have just started to try out the new RESTful routes. For resources that aren''t related to anything else, everything makes sense - for resources with relationships, I am less certain of what the "right" thing to do - especially in relation to the urls produced, and how to modify those urls. For example, if I have teams and

On 24.05.2018 13:11, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On 24 May 2018, at 20:19, Sam McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The coding guidelines say: >>> Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case

Luke, I thought about what you said about nouns, but having trouble coming up with an example of what you mean. Would you be willing to rework my example into the words your talking about? I''m not asking for a solution here...this is more about how to think about the problem being solved. Mike B. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent

I am having a heck of a time understanding the new rest craze in rails. what I think I understand so far: 1 rest is about the way we use http to access information on the internet. 2 http was created with nouns and verbs in mind, but the only verbs that are supported in browsers and server software today are ''post'' and ''get''. Other useful verbs include put

Greetings! I''m thinking of setting up a table of "domains", consisting of the core fields id, code, name, description, and type. Users is a domain, orders is a domain, recipes is a domain, etc. Domain attributes other than those covered by the core fields will go to, say, a user_other_fields table, recipe_other_fields, etc. I see the advantage of having all

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:21:53 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've been working with the third statement being true and exercising > > the rid option. > > Can I suggest you put it back, or add the RFC2307 attributes and use

So, after looking at *doing* this, I'm left with more questions and no good answers. C++ has truly failed me today. This enum is currently designed (and even *documented* as being designed) to allow conversion-to-bool to detect whether any alias is possible (that is, only no-alias becomes false). This makes it *really* easy to write the overwhelming majority of test: if ("do things

Surprisingly this invalid latex syntax is still formatted "right" in the html output. On a closer look it seems like roxygen2 introduces those, when using markdown backtick quoting, if the quoted content is not syntactic. For instance: #' `c(c(1)` #' `c(c(1))` Will convert the first line to `\verb{c(c(1)}` and the second to `\code{c(c(1))}`. I've opened a ticket there FYI:

On Apr 26, 2008, at 17:41, Anders Johnsen wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > Thanks a lot for the feedback. I can see I've been way to > concentrated on how > llvm is build, then on this particular patch. I've done the changes > you have > suggested and it's now a lot nicer and cleaner! > > Please do say, if there is anything else. Nice. Just a few small

Do I understand correctly that we don't want Rd files to be valid latex ? This seems odd to me. I see that `tools::parse_Rd()` doesn't like `\verb!foo!` so maybe roxygen2 is actually doing the right thing (as opposed to just trying to) ? `parse_Rd() ` is probably what I need indeed, for some reason I hadn't found it, so that should fix my own issue here thanks a lot. Le ven. 21 juil.

? Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:14:09 +0200 Antoine Fabri <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> ?????: > On a closer look it seems like roxygen2 introduces those, when using > markdown backtick quoting, if the quoted content is not syntactic. For > instance: > > #' `c(c(1)` > #' `c(c(1))` > > Will convert the first line to `\verb{c(c(1)}` and the second to >