similar to: transferring callerid ?

Changing it to only apply to the MinGW-Makefiles generator is maybe the safest method. Though you would have to check if MINGW is only set in the Mingw-Makefiles generator and not In the MSYS-Makefiles or Cygwin generators (should be in the docs). -- Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer, MSc Wiss. Mitarbeiter - Interactive Engineering Technologies (IET) Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung

Can anyone update me on the status of http://bugs.centos.org/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=5897 I'd really like to know if there is a fix for this as we're trying to get AD/NFSv4 working on 6.3 and having one hell of a time. -- James A. Peltier Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail :

Hi, I download the last svn and I also look around but I cannot find the source, I only found the patch http://bugs.digium.com/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=8919 any one can help me out. thx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070209/6780fde6/attachment.htm

This bug report http://bugs.digium.com/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=12038 apparently has been fixed. I dont see anything on the page saying what released version of asterisk this is in. How can I tell that? jerry

I have a Sangoma b600de analog card using dahdi 2.1.0.4 and I get the following results (same dialplan, config etc): Asterisk 1.6.0.1 => works fine Asterisk 1.6.0.9 => can't dial out unless I dial in once or apply patch >>>==> http://bugs.digium.com/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=14577 Asterisk 1.6.1.0 => can't dial out, regardless of patch or inbound call first.

I just took my first cent server into production and now saslauthd keep crashing after brute force attack. I found a bug report so this has already been reported but not fixed. http://bugs.centos.org/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=2860 I assume this has to be a large problem for many people and am surprised it hasn't been fixed yet. Has anyone found a work around for this bug? Is there a

Hi, this is my first post to this list, so please excuse if submitting a patch without previous discussion is considered bad form or anything similar. I encountered a bug in the CMake build while using MinGW (non-MSYS, non-CYGWIN) where the LTO_export fails with a "The syntax of the command is incorrect" error. This error was previously fixed for Windows in general using

Hello, This morning I noticed the following output from "yum update": Installing: drbd82 x86_64 8.2.5-1.el5.centos extras 209 k replacing drbd.x86_64 8.0.11-1.el5.centos As far as I'm aware DRBD works fine for me. Is there a way I can find out about the new release and weather I should upgrade? I can't figure out the CentOS issue tracking system

Hello, I downloaded asterisk 1.0.5, and the cvs version, and none of them has the attended transfer option (x and X). I see a patch here: http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460 but this patch doesn't applies well in cvs version or 1.0.5. How can I make attended transfers work? It's a feature really needed :( Thanks in advance :) -- Paco Brufal

We just started seeing the errors described in <http://bugs.centos.org/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=5575> The question is, given that we're not seeing DRDY errors, and this is showing on all four drives, and there's no RAID, should we just turn off SMART, or is this telling us something important, other than the bug? mark

Hello List, Does anyone know why this is not available in CentOS 6.6. I found it in a SL repo but not in CentOS. I found several CentOS Bugs one answered by JH http://bugs.centos.org/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=6822 saying it had been added to 6.5 2013-12-09 19:05 JohnnyHughes Resolution open => fixed But it is still not available. cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.6 (Final)

I am working on a system for indexing email, and it would be nice to be able to store multiple values for the same value_no - for instance, if an email has multiple attachments, I might want to attach a value for each attachment, but a value with the same number. One option would be store the three values as one, e.g. comma-separated, but I was just wondering how others have dealt with such a

The new patch works fine, but considering the discussion on the CMake bug tracker, I'm would say that TO_NATIVE_PATH shouldn't be used at all. ________________________________________ From: Dan Liew [dan at su-root.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 10:38 AM To: Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [patch] EXPORTED_SYMBOL_FILE using mingw

Hello, I am testing the Openstage phones from Siemens but I can not find a solution on how to update the caller-id after a successful attended transfer. Of course, I mean an attended transfer by using the phones functionality, not something defined in asterisks features.conf. Any idea on how to achieve this, or any technical document from Siemens on on how this is support to work would help.

Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where our asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP packets. Once from 114.31.50.10, second time from 173.212.200.146. We became aware of the problem when bandwidth started suffering because asterisk got very busy sending back replies or rejects (dunno which, I didn't investigate it any further).

Hello, all. I'm having a deeply frustrating time getting multiple parking lots to work and am wondering what I am doing wrong. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.1. I defined two separate parking lots in features.conf as follows: [parkinglot_a100] ; SSI context => a100-parking parkpos => 900-920 findslot => next [parkinglot_a10] ; EBC context => a10-parking parkpos => 800-820

On Tuesday 25 June 2019 at 16:49:23, Doug Lytle wrote: > We have Polycom phones (I'm using a VVX601, the destination is a VVX301). > We're also on Asterisk 13. > > I forwarded my call to the VVX301 and then dialed my phones DID. Surely that is "call forwarding", which is quite different from either a blind or attended transfer? A transfer involves a call coming

Hello, when a call comes in and is answered by colleague A, this colleague A sees the CallerID of the external calling number. When colleague A transfers the call to colleague B, attended or unattended, then colleague B sees the number of colleague A on his screen while talking to the external calling number. I expect here that colleague B would see the external calling number on the screen

Hi list, I'm wondering if it's possible to transfer a call that is still ringing??? I Have some Grandstream GXP-2000 and with the TRNF button it's impossible. So, I've configured some keys to transfer the calls like this: [featuremap] blindxfer => #2 ; Blind transfer (default is #) disconnect => *0 ; Disconnect (default is *) ;automon => *1

Hi Is this patch (http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001719) the best/only way to get callerid working in the UK with a tdm400p? I thought I'd seen a patch that'd gone into cvs, but maybe I was just imagining things ;) Should this patch work against current cvs? Of the 3 files 2 are .patch and one is .diff - what's the difference between them, and how should I