similar to: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?"

2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2007 Jul 27
0
Is it possible transcode (ilbc <-> g.729) in software ?
Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my
2004 Jul 29
0
G.729 between Zap and SIP
Hi, I have licensed the digium G.729A codec. But for some reason incoming and outgoing calls will ALWAYS use G.711a. When I force my phone to only accept G.729 then an incoming call from ZAP goes straight to my voicemailbox as the phone doesn't accept the codec Asterisk wants, even if I force it in sip.conf. Is there anywhere else I need to look to tell ZAP to use G.729 preferrably ? The
2004 Jul 30
0
G.729 <-> ZAP ?
Hi, I am trying to replace my Cisco 5300 gateway with my new Zap TE405P card. Incoming calls and outgoing calls between my cisco and my SIP phone works fine on G.729. Recording messages in the asterisk voice-mailbox also works fine from both my SIP phone as well as PSTN -> Cisco -> Asterisk. I have licensed the digium G.729A codec. When I connect my ISDN PRI to my Zap card and I call
2006 Jan 13
2
ILBC to G711 transcoding experince ?
Hello All, Anyone here has experience of accepting a ilbc call and sending it on g711 or g729 I am having problem in VOICE , call goes though but there is no voice. Senario: Call is coming in from Machine A to Machine B, sending to Machine C Machine B is an asterisk box, transcoding it from IBLC to G711 and g729. Problem: Voice is not appearing on the sip user sitting on machine A Already
2005 Jan 19
4
G.729? Worth it?
Hi All, For a small installation using ITSPs via DSL is G.729 a worthwhile exercise? I have G.729 capable SIP phones and my ITSPs cupport the codec so I could go end-to-end without transcoding. What's call quality like compared to G.711, GSM or iLBC? Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com
2004 Oct 04
1
Will there be any support for iLBC in IAXClients soon?
Hello Folks, I noticed that all of the IaxClient based softphones with exception of Firefly only seem to have support for GSM but what about iLBC? The quality is excellent with iLBC even on a dialup connection! Meanwhile while the audio on GSM often sounds scratchy. Is anyone looking to implement iLBC in an IaxClient based softphone soon? Errol Biz4Web Solutions Limited
2004 May 14
2
GSM v iLBC for low bandwidth connections
Hi All, I've been playing with GSM and iLBC over low bandwidth connections (central Asterisk box with 2mbps, to ADSL users on 512/256) and both seem to perform well. Based upon what I've read in the archives and at voip-info.org iLBC should perform a little better if packets are lost, than compared to GSM. Do you find this to be true in practice, or is GSM just as robust? Whilst
2003 Dec 16
0
Transcoding CPU usage: surveys?
Before I put myself to the task (next month, maybe) of surveying the CPU costs of transcoding, perhaps someone else has already done this work and would be willing to share it or refer me to a link of previously published data. My reviews of the mailing list with various keywords were unsuccessful in finding adequate references, though I admit I only spent 20 minutes looking. What I seek is
2004 Dec 04
1
Codec translator problem (g723.1,ilbc => alaw)
Hi, I cannot get SIP channel working with folowing codec configuration: [sip] disallow=all allow=g723.1 ;I need this codec between sip phones (BT100) allow=ilbc ;Use this codec to others Calling between BT100 SIP phones is OK - asterisk makes native bridge (with g723.1) between them. When I'm calling from SIP to other channel (iax,zap,...), asterisk is not able to chose right codec
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Re: Attaching VoiceMails on E-Mails
Hello Marco, On 7/27/07, Marco Mouta <marco.mouta at gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > The VoiceMail<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+voicemail2>application uses > */usr/sbin/sendmail* to mail voicemail messages to users. This can be any > sendmail-compatible MTA. In practice you can use Sendmail<http://sendmail.org/>, > Postfix
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Re: Attaching VoiceMails on E-Mails
Hello Marco, On 7/27/07, Marco Mouta <marco.mouta at gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > The VoiceMail<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+voicemail2>application uses > */usr/sbin/sendmail* to mail voicemail messages to users. This can be any > sendmail-compatible MTA. In practice you can use Sendmail<http://sendmail.org/>, > Postfix
2007 Jul 27
0
Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Autoreply: Re: Attaching VoiceMails on E-Mails
Hello Marco, On 7/27/07, Marco Mouta <marco.mouta at gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > The VoiceMail<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+voicemail2>application uses > */usr/sbin/sendmail* to mail voicemail messages to users. This can be any > sendmail-compatible MTA. In practice you can use Sendmail<http://sendmail.org/>, > Postfix