similar to: HP OfficeJet 6110, Sipura 2102, T.38, and Clarent

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "HP OfficeJet 6110, Sipura 2102, T.38, and Clarent"

2004 Jun 23
0
clarent hardware
Just wondering if anyone has had any luck with the Clarent CPGs ( uses MGCP ). I have a couple CPG 201s laying around that I am trying to get working but am having difficulties. They successfully register with the asterisk box, but when I lift the handset of the phone plugged into any of its ports, there is no dial tone, I hear no DTMF tones when I press keys, etc. But I can make the phone ring by
2006 Feb 08
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 58
Define non-Voice T1 porject? You do know that TDMoE does not travel over long distances, You can not route or otherwise take it off of a single ethernet segment. > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Mike Hammett > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:20 AM > To:
2006 Feb 08
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 58
Reason I ask is I may have a non-voice T-1 replacement project going on and I'm investigating my various options. Costs may be about the same for turn-key and DIY. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Thursday, February
2012 Feb 17
1
Should a Linksys Sipura 2102 be configured with nat=yes even if it is on the local network?
Should a Linksys Sipura 2102 be configured with nat=yes even if it is on the local network? I have been having some troubles with a Linksys Sipura 2100 series, which suffers from NO AUDIO after a few calls.. Because it is on the same subnet as Asterisk it is configured with nat=no. When you think of it because the Sipura 2100 is a broadband router, the voice part may be considered as being behind
2007 Oct 17
1
[asterisk-biz] T.38
On 10/17/07, Mike Hammett <asterisk-biz at ics-il.net> wrote: > I wasn't looking to involve Asterisk until I got it working solidly without > it. ;-) > > I have yet to find on the entire internet a working example of T.38 pass-thru. I need to file a bugreport of T.38 being broken :(
2007 Jun 04
1
Oddity
I have two Asterisk servers. One is my primary server that I link to all of my providers and the other is at an office building with multiple tenants. If I tell Asterisk to dial an entry in the iax.conf that is for one customer off that second box, why does it use a different account for a different customer? It still ends up at the correct box, but it is hard to troubleshoot issues when
2007 Sep 06
2
Different Networks
I have multiple upstreams in my office. The primary upstream is having some issues with latency\jitter. I want to move the VoIP traffic to another interface. I have the router set to send all traffic destined for "local" networks out the respective interfaces. Traffic destined to the Internet goes out one of the upstreams. I can do this on a per-IP basis and have successfully done
2009 Jan 15
2
Asterisk - Trixbox
My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox. I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different network. It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate against that number, which isn't present on the box. Could someone help me decode this debugging output? I was calling 8159911010. My server is 208.100.1.33. Theirs is 208.1.87.235. I
2007 Sep 05
8
Ping
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070905/c62f4465/attachment.htm
2007 Nov 20
2
e911
One of my providers has a different SIP account for each number. I have all of my users in one outbound context (caller ID passes fine). How do I ensure that the callers get routed down their correct SIP account with my provider for e911 purposes without each having their own context? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part
2008 Mar 13
5
Mail Server
I need to setup a small mail server on a local network. It only needs SMTP ability as it's just so Asterisk can send out emails. The machine has sendmail installed. My primary mail server seems to be rejecting the messages. Some research says something isn't configured properly. What do I have to do so the outside world accepts emails from my Asterisk box? It is behind a NAT.
2006 Jan 16
1
RTP redirect system usage
If the RTP is redirected, does this put the system under a smaller load? Obviously less network usage, but what about processor usage, etc.? I'd assume so, but some times ya never know. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2007 Jan 23
0
AW: Snom 320 echo
Most of the cases can easily be solved by setting the handset mic gain to 2 (out of 1..8). The gain is usually much to high - optimal for whispering voices. If the other side talks loud the echo of the cable will be amplified too much. CS ________________________________ Von: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett
2006 Mar 22
1
Dial plan question - exclamtion mark
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Dialplan+Patterns says: ======== ! wildcard, matches zero or more characters immediately (only Asterisk 1.2 and later, see note) Note: The exclamation mark wildcard, which is available only in Asterisk 1.2 and later, behaves specially - it will match as soon as can without waiting for the dialing to complete, but
2007 Jun 26
1
Multi port IAX Gateway
I am looking for a gateway that has several FXS ports and uses IAX. I have a need for 16 ports, but will accept 6 or 8 port gateways as well. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com> http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2008 Feb 20
6
Coppercom and Asterisk
My provider has a Coppercom switch. I have included the authentication information they gave me. How would I structure this in Asterisk to the registration and the entry in sip.conf? User Name - 8159093010 Password - XXXXX No Pin Proxy - sip.essex1.com (10.1.3.2) Outbound Proxy - proxy.essex1.com (63.164.210.14) Change setting to use "outbound Proxy" ---------- Mike Hammett
2007 May 21
2
VoiceMail Access
I was looking at the ILECs' web sites to determine how their users access voicemail. I looked at AT&T, Verizon, Qwest, and Embarq. They supported one or a combination of the following for calling from your phone: *98 #55 Toll free number Your number A varying phone number, based on your number's location. Calling from anywhere else, they supported: Hitting star when
2008 Mar 04
1
Cisco 7960 SIP Upgrade
I couldn't figure it out on my own. I tried to purchase a Smartnet for the phone, but the original 7960 is not supported. Is it technically possible and if so, what would it cost me to have someone remote into my network and upgrade my SCCP 7960 to the latest SIP firmware? ---------- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part --------------
2006 Jan 26
1
S100-FX v2.0
I just saw the S100-FX v2.0 on eBay. I was wondering if anyone has tried it out and what their opinion of it was. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060126/3da2e4e5/attachment.htm
2007 May 20
1
Caller ID matching
What's going on here? 555* seems to indicate that the number is being passed as the callerID because NoOp says the phone number. I'm trying to emulate cell phone voicemail where you call your own number to check your voicemail. -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 65.182.165.XXX: > requested format = gsm, > requested prefs = (), > actual format