similar to: phones can make outgoing calls but no incoming

Hi, I'm aware that incoming and outgoing calls are going fine when isdn channels are involved - caller id properly identifies calling party, so user can call back.... But how to properly handle this for iax, sip calls.... I have few questions : - BTW, what to type for instance in remote firefly to make standalone calls to Asterisk default context or particular extension ? - If I receive

Hi everyone I have successfully compiled and installed OH323 support (finally) into my Asterisk. I want to connect the Asterisk server to our Alcatel OmniPCX Office (OXO) PABX, which has an internal H.323 gateway. I have created the correct dialplans in Asterisk and same in OXO. The OXO only supports G711a G711u G729 and G723.1 codecs. When I call from a SIP phone to OXO using my

Hi all, I have a problem with my asterisk box and an X100P FXO card. I am able to place outgoing calls from my SIP phone (Cisco 7940) to any external number using my PSTN line, but when I call my PSTN line from my cell phone, the Cisco doesn't ring (and no message appears in the Asterisk CLI). Here are my config files: zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone = be defaultzone = be

Hello all! We have an E400P on a dual Xeon box with four EuroISDN PRI to the PSTN and Cisco ATA-186 as SIP UA. We experience very large amount of echo (on -some- calls) when we're doing PRI->SIP calls but not when doing SIP->PRI calls. We don't think the problem is IP latency related (When calls are made PRI->*->PRI we still experience the echo). What do you think? Regards

Hello all! We have an E400P on a dual Xeon box with four EuroISDN PRI to the PSTN and Cisco ATA-186 as SIP UA. We experience very large amount of echo (on -some- calls) when we're doing PRI->SIP calls but not when doing SIP->PRI calls. We don't think the problem is IP latency related (When calls are made PRI->*->PRI we still experience the echo). What do you think?

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 00:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:29 -0500 > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > By the strict letter of the 32-bit ABI, the save and restore of > > r31 at a negative offset of r1 is verboten. The ABI states the > > the stack space below the stack pointer is declared as volatile. > > I actually

On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > By default it should build for > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > > specifically build for something else, use: > > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > > or > > -ccc-host-triple

Hello all, in order to connect to my SSH servers from untrusted devices like company computers or my smartphone, I set up 2FA with google-authenticator hooked into PAM. However, this is not really 2FA at least for the smartphone, since I use the same device for generating the TANs and it is also at least inconvenient to always require a new TAN for each connection. I do not want to solely rely

Good day! A few weeks ago, we had a security breach in the company I'm working for, because employees used "ssh -R" to expose systems from our internal network to some SSH server in the outer world. Of course, this is a breach of our internal security policy, but lead us to wonder, whether there is a technical solution to prevent our users from creating SSH-reverse-tunnels. After

On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:23:07 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:06 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > LLVM/clang now will build in the normal way (./configure; make > > install) on PPC (you'll need at least the 3.1 release candidate (or > > trunk)). I generally build on my PPC64 hosts with: > > make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1

Hi, I am using debian 4.0 with version 2.6.18-4-686 I have downloaded the required files form site asterisk-1.2.24.tar.gz libmfcr2-0.0.3-1.4.tar.bz2 libsupertone-0.0.2.tar.gz libunicall-0.0.3-1.4.tar.bz2 spandsp-20060903.tar.gz I

Ok, and then? in file smb.conf.192.168.0.1 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth0 ... [FOR_ALL] ... in file smb.conf.192.168.0.2 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth1 ... [ADMINS] ... Does this configuration works? Is this a good solution? i really don't know, so what's the global thinking about this. -- Information Systems

On 9/13/17 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner via llvm-dev wrote: > On 9/12/17 8:15 PM, Bill Seurer via llvm-dev wrote: >> I updated one of my powerpc64le llvm test systems to Fedora 25 and I >> started getting a whole bunch of sanitizer test case failures.  I tried >> testing some earlier revisions on the new OS that had worked fine under >> the old but they generate the same

Hi, I have a problem with TDM2400P card. The card is detected ok, I can make a call but only with pulse dialing (not tone dialing) without hear sounds from the headset. When I receive a call, I can to establish a communication, but without hear sounds from the headset. When I dial any phone key, I can hear dtmf tone. I'm using Elastix 1.5.2. These are my configuration files:

On Apr 4 13:58, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Wuerstlein > <snalwuer at cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote: > > On 2018-04-04T17:27, mlrx <openssh-unix-dev at 18informatique.com> wrote: > >> Le 04/04/2018 ? 13:32, Jan Bergner a ?crit : > >> > Good day! > >> > > >> > Is it possible to

Hi I am interested in setting up an Asterisk PBX in my office with digium hardware, and I just have a few questions in regards to what I would need. It is my understanding that an FXO card is used to interface with an incoming/outgoing phone line, and an FXS card is used for interfacing with a phone within the system. Currently we have 4 incoming/outgoing phone lines and would like to have

Hello, OpenSSH-wizards. In our company, we have looked into SSH-HostKey-signing in order to realize automated access without the need to accept the server's hostkey, manually. I got it to work with the HostCertificate-directive inside the sshd_config. Now, I was wondering whether it is possible to have multiple signatures, so I can, for example, sign the hostkey once with a

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:54 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > There is a comment in the file which reads: > > /* The weird 'i#*X' constraints on the following suppress a gcc > warning when __excepts is not a constant. Otherwise, they mean the > same as just plain 'i'. */ [sinp] > ("mtfsb0 %s0" : : "i#*X"(__builtin_ffs (__excepts))); [snip]

Peter, Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself that is failing to initially interpret the string? If it is the code in TargetLowering, then I don't see any support

Hello Damien, Brian and all, thanks for the suggestions. I actually had not considered host-based authentication and looked it up. As I understand from my first quick reading, I would need to specify the clients which are allowed to use host-based auth on the server with a DNS name or an IP, which would not work for a client behind a CG NAT or in a cellular network. Or did I get this wrong?