similar to: Re: Core Dump: create_transaction (p=0x0) atpbx_dundi.c:2787

Anyone seen this...? Is it a known issue? I'd file a bug, but we're on 1.2.9.13, and every time I file a bug and it isn't against the latest code I get given crap for it. Given that most of the time you don't know HOW to reproduce a problem on the latest code anyway, not accepting bugs from older versions does the community no service, because potential bugs are never accepted for

Hi, Came across the substruct project and decided to download and play with it. Am running rails 1.1.2 with ruby 1.8.4 on Ubuntu. I start webrick .. went to the admin section of the store. Create a product. Went to the store section and put this product in my cart and then clicked on checkout. I fill the form and submit it . I click on the "Finish Order" button and get the following

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:18 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Meetme... No channel type registered > for'zap' > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:06:02AM -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > -----Original

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Mountifield [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 2:41 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Match a Numer - then continue with, > dialplan > > > In article > <645FEC31A18FE54A8721500CDD55A7B6035D0C6C@mail.oneeighty.com>, > Douglas Garstang

"Douglas Garstang" <dgarstang@oneeighty.com> wrote: >Boy, am I stuck... > >I'm officially ready to toss Asterisk out the window. I have to admit it isn't necessarily all the fault of Asterisk either. It just seems that every option I turn to suddenly ends in failure. I don't know if it's me that's bitten of more than I can chew with this project, or

asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com > >

I agree with these fella's, this is a piss poor way of fixing it. I only know of one call center that used static agents, mostly because they were sold a peice of crap and they had no idea how to use it the other way. I think you will find the majority of call centers are callback centers. This decision has taken Asterisk out of the realm of providing reasonable call center solutions. VIVA

Andrew, I don't think it's a Polycom issue. We took Asterisk out of the picture and had our Polycom phones communicate directly with an Audiocodes PSTN gateway. Unlike Asterisk, the audiocodes do not send 180 Ringing before sending 183 Session Progress, and the polycom's play the correct tones in this case. We WANT Asterisk to send progress tones in band. In our case it IS needed.

This is a SER/Polycom question, but I hoped we may have some SER guru's here... I have a series of Polycom phones that are tying to register with OpenSER. The phone sends a REGISTER message, and OpenSER replies with Unauthorised (all normal). The phone re-sends the REGISTER with the credentials, and OpenSER sends Ok. Here's where it goes downhill. The polycom's appearance display

Who said I was a C programmer? -----Original Message----- From: Terry Wilson [mailto:otherwiseguy@gmail.com] Sent: Wed 6/14/2006 6:03 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle Complex FailoverSituations pbx/pbx_dundi.c in dundifunc_read(). shouldn't be too hard to have it set some variables (i.e.

Is there a way to get asterisk to send you a email when it looses or an extension doesn?t re-register Roger Workman Business Development Upperclassman/Universal Holdings LLC Voice: 304.324.3800 Fax: 304.324.3801 ICQ: 4447584 Website: http://www.upperclassman.net Billing Questions: billing at upperclassman.net Rental Questions: rentals at upperclassman.net Maintenance: help at

Asterisk doesn't seem to be relaying 183, Session Progress SIP messages received from an upstream host back to the phone. Anyone know why? Here's the SIP message that Asterisk receives, and it does nothing with it. It doesn't pass it back to the phone. <-- SIP read from xxx.yyy.142.234:5060: SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP

On Sat, 23 May 1998, Torkil Zachariassen wrote: > >I have browsed various versions of libc and found a handful of weak points > >where the value of an enviroment variable is trusted more than necessary. > [1] > Could you explain to programming novices on linux-security - people like > myself 8) - hwo this could affect security on a firewall (proxy and/or > IP-router,

Is anyone getting '500 Internal Server' errors back from their Polycom phones when Asterisk sends a SIP NOTIFY message to them? I called Polycom tech support, who where utterly useless. Of course Polycom won't officially support it anyway, as they only support Asterisk Business Edition. We're using 1.2.9, but it's been ocurring for quite some time. We have about 35 phones and

Hello, I'm not a programmer or know well how to operate gdb. However I've made an attempt to backtrace the problem with 'make debug' and gdb. Please help if you can. I'd appreciate it, I have this problem for a couple of months now. The problem basically is that on debian unstable official packages for the past couple of months(even after debian updates) I get segfaults when I

I reveived this message as panic action, of my debian Unstable (Samba 3.0). Don't look for any solution, as the service is just reloaded, but I hape that can be useful for debugging. Bye Davide Parise -----Messaggio originale----- Da: root [mailto:root@server00.iskranet.it] Inviato: marted? 28 ottobre 2003 2.03 A: root@server00.iskranet.it Oggetto: Segfault in Samba The Samba 'panic

Good morning, we've recently had some strange message in /var/log/syslog. System: debian bullseye, kernel 5.10.0-21-amd64 and 5.10.0-22-amd64 gluster 10.3 The message look like: Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715229] INFO: task glfs_fusenoti:2787 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715327] Not tainted 5.10.0-22-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.178-3 Apr

I don't think the issue is on gluster side, it seems the issue is on kernel side (possible deadlock in fuse_reverse_inval_entry) https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bda9a71980e083699a0360963c0135657b73f47a On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:48?PM Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com> wrote: > Good morning, > > we've recently had some strange

Hi, gdbserver-xen coredump after i step through a few lines of code. build dom0 with debug_domu. Enable debuginfo and frame pointer for dom U and attach the domu with gdbserver . In gdb put breakpoint at say sys_open and after going through few lines of code gdbserver-xen coredumps. The resulting core file has the below stack $gdb /usr/local/bin/gdbserver-xen ./core GNU gdb 6.3-debian

On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 15:25 -0500, Gedalya wrote: > On 11/21/2014 06:12 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 11:03 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/mallopt.3.html also talks about > >> various dynamic thresholds for growing and shrinking the heap. My guess > >> is that we are bouncing up and down over some