similar to: Got reject for frame XX, retransmitting frame XX now, updating n_r!

Anyone know what would cause this error? !! Got reject for frame 39, retransmitting frame 39 now, updating n_r! !! Got reject for frame 39, retransmitting frame 40 now, updating n_r! I assume this would cause audio issues as well. Thanks, Steve > Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2) > [18 03 a9 83 89] > Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0

Hi- I've posted this on the bugs list, but I'd also like to see if others have had similar problems when connecting via E1 trunks (E400P). I'm getting numerous errors like the following during inbound calls to my E1 channels. These occur when the system is under medium load: WARNING[196621]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5404 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 78, retransmitting

I've got a 4 port T1 card in my Asterisk box with a PRI from Qwest as my PSTN interface. I'm experiencing random dropped calls on the various SIP devices I have tested. Network connectivity to the SIP devices looks ok, and I have tried a variety of the devices including all of the following. Grandstream 286 Grandstresm 486 Sipura SPA 1000 Mediatrix 2102 Some example lines from my logs

Hi all, what could be the cause for the following messages? May 22 12:44:53 WARNING[3791]: chan_zap.c:8498 zt_pri_error: 2 !! Got reject for frame 0, but we only have others! May 22 12:44:54 WARNING[3791]: chan_zap.c:8498 zt_pri_error: 2 !! Got reject for frame 0, but we only have others! May 22 12:44:55 WARNING[3791]: chan_zap.c:8498 zt_pri_error: 2 !! Got reject for frame 0, but we only have

I've this error How i can find the problem? Apr 23 12:24:43 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:47 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:48 WARNING[131081]: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Apr 23 12:24:53 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:25:02 WARNING[131081]: PRI:

Dear List i have upgrade my * box with the latest CVS version of Asterisk Stable 1.0 and zaptel/libpri my system is MDK9.2 with 1 TE410P and seems work well for now but i have a little amount of traffic (25 IN/OUT calls) i only notice this Warning.. What kind of error is? ------------------------------- Apr 20 21:28:49 WARNING[147466]: chan_zap.c:5979 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got reject for

Hi! I have the chance to play with a couple of E400P cards, each installed in a IBM e330 XSeries servers (2 x 1GHz P-III CPU 2 Gb RAM, 36Gb SCSI HDD with RH8.0 2.4.18-smp kernel), and I'm trying to test/benchmark this e330/E400P combo generating calls thru /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing One e400P if doing the carrier work making calls and the other just receives the calls: Server#1

Asterisk is behind firewall, I'm able to register with the provider. Calls are coming IN OK, but when I try to call out I got: Got SIP response 603 "Declined" back from 81.15.xx.xx -- #Joseph

Hi all- HELP! This is actually a revisit of a problem that I had earlier with E400P's at a customer site. Customer still gets locked up channel problem, but has learned to live with it (channels clear themselves after several minutes). The symptoms, which I believe are directly related: I'm having problems with tons of framing and "read" errors on my E1 connections (and

Hi, We have a Ericsson BP250 Phone system setup witht he following configuration Telco <-> Asterisk E405P <-> BP250 The system seem to work perfectly on 1.0.9 for a very long time but there is some functionality we wanted to take advantage of in the 1.2 version branch so we upgraded. Currently running Asterisk 1.2.4 Zaptel 1.2.3 (noticed 1.2.4 is out will upgrade next

Hi, Urgently response would be wonderful, system is a Fedora Core 2. I have a Ericsson BP250 connected to 1 port on the TE405P and another connected to a local telco ISDN30. I have been running CVS-HEAD from about a 2 months ago and upgraded it again just in cause it was a version issue (didn't fix it) but this is what I am getting. When a person calls out from an extension on the BP250 to

Configuration: Linux wpbx 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:11:04 EST 2001 i686 unknown P4 2.5 GHz, 1 GB RAM T400P with 3 T1s plugged in. A flow of 46 calls (spread out over 3 T1s). Each call gets transferred (Dial) to the SIP platform and stays for 5 min. Case 1. Asterisk built out of CVS Mar. 19. Test was running for 3 days. Segmentation fault. Case 2. Asterisk built out of CVS Apr. 1. Test was running

Hello Syslinux Team, To reduce the recurrent issues regarding new locations for binary files (bios/efi32/efi64), I'd like to suggest adding this important change to NEWS, in the "6.00" section (not retroactively, of course, just from now on). IMHO, this is the most simple way for users to clearly notice this relevant change. When users want to find out "what's

I just tried to go from CAS to PRI on my T1 (Sangoma), and failed pretty badly. Seemingly everything worked -- Asterisk would see the incoming call (including CID and DID info), try to route it, and fail -- giving me a telco (not Asterisk) call failure message. My zapata.conf and zaptel.conf files are at http://pastebin.com/558349 Below's the log dump. Note that, because I was simply going

Hi, I've been learning asterisk for a couple of weeks now - and it worked for me as faar as standard configurations where concerned (sip/iax outbound/isdn4linux & capi with AVM Fritz!, Digium X100P FXO). Now I recently I'evaluating to use asterisk as a replacemnt for our companies (15 employees) legacy pbx system and I'm experiencing multiple problems with the hfc isdn cards:

Hello, here my achitecture: client1--Asterisk1----ser1---centile client2-- client1 do a call to centile. centile do a forward to client2 (Diversion) and then use the same CALL-ID! when asterisk1 receive the call with the same CALL-ID, it screen "Now forwarding SIP/XXXX -000002f6 to 'Local/MCDU at kamailio ' (thanks to SIP/YYY-000002f7)" I don't want that asterisk receive

Hi, we have a E1 pri from Citylink, (they are using Ericsson Engine exchange), that are restarting after 5 - 15 minutes, before and after that we can make calls in and out w/o problems. The cards have been tested in two computers (Atholon XP 2200+ and Celeron 2.6Ghz), are on there own IRQ, not showing any IRQ misses in zttool. It's all correctly configuered - zaptel and zapata (attached). We

Hi, What does retransmitting NAT means? I have a client that uses SPA 942, and his phone sometimes cannot be called. i did a sip sebug and i keep on seeing retransmitting NAT. on the realtime it shows that it is registered, so when i try to call it , asterisk thinks it is still online so it tries to reach it instead of saying it's unavailable, [Oct 9 11:10:33] -- Called 103100 it

I just had the same exact problem this morning. The only thing I've done in the last couple of days is update update zaptel. I rolled back my zaptel to 2/11/04 from 3/8/04. And kept my libpri from 3/8/04. I never had this error before updated. I had other issues, but not this one. -sb -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com

Hello all, I got a problem at an asterisk server, with dropping calls, losing all channels and reaktivating all channels and beeing back up. This problem seems to occure randomly over the whole day, when it gots traffic on the card. After looking @ google I found several hints but none did work fine. To avoid problems with the phone line (german E1) I called the provider, he did a 45 min. route