similar to: frame.c:128 ast_smoother_feed

We have one Swissvoice IP10S running SIP firmware. Recently, I've been getting these messages: Mar 1 13:59:44 NOTICE[20933]: frame.c:128 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Any clues off the bat? I'm still researching other stuff.. Thanks, Matthew

Hi, Do the g729 codec licenses for Asterisk work on a SIP environment (only SIP UAs running g729 + Asterisk)? I would like to buy a couple for a SIP test lab but I have not found any documentation on wether it works for SIP UAs or not. The Digium page only mentions: "The G.729 codec works with all Digium cards." Can somebody tell me please? Thanks, Ricardo Villa

Just shoved my 7960 onto one of my clients networks. I'm talking from outside the office to them (they are using a GS BT101). I'm getting the following message repeatedly in the log, whenever someone talks. Jul 17 12:29:40 NOTICE[96402352]: frame.c:120 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Both phones are set to use the G729

Hi, I'm new in asterisk world. I have questions. For example I have my server with public IP address, but two customer with softphone in a private network. How can I do to make them work with the asterisk server? Best Regards -- Ever Zalazar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm getting this error continuously when sending to a cisco 5300: frame.c:120 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end The connection is highly intermittent, sometimes there's a ring, other times there is not. Is there a way to completely disable vad support in *? -g

Hello all. I'm new to asterisk and have been using and testing it for about a week now. My initial hope has been to use it as a sip<->h323 gateway to tie SIP & H323 based ip phones together with my Cisco AS5300 and Lucent MaxTNT/MVAM networks. I am currently running Asterisk 0.5.0 under Redhat 9 on a single PIII 800 with 256megs RAM. I have tried a couple CVS version from the past

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual

Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I

There are many ways to implement a VAD. What you described is actually perfectly equivalent to the most trivial (and least robust) VAD algorithm. Jean-Marc Andy Ross wrote: > Ton Grandgent wrote: >> Andy Ross wrotte: >>> I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works >>> basically 100% of the time. >> Could you please explain how this differs from

Hi All, I am using R 2.11.0 on a Ubuntu machine. I have a time series data set and want to run rolling regressions with it. Any suggestions would be useful. Here are the details: (1) I convert relevant variables into time series objects and compute first differences: vad <- ts(data$ALLGVA/data$GDPDEF, start=1948, frequency=1) emp <- ts(data$ALLEMP, start=1948, frequency=1) vad.dif1 <-

Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their

Hello all: I am interested in using Speex for an application that streams audio from a (noisy) source, so I am interested in VAD and DTX operation. However, after browsing the archives of this list, I note that a number of people have not been satisfied with the operation of the VAD algorithm in Speex. This leads me to a few questions: - Is there a reference somewhere (other than the source

Hi all, supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmission of VAD/CNG samples by specifying "outbound" in the communication channel only 1 bit instead of sending the whole VAD/CNG packet. I am doing the same for AMR

My data is speech sampled as pcm mono 32khz. I want to use vad for regulating the agc gain mechanism. So... if voice is not detected I just reduce the agc value in order to not amplify the 'silence' otherwise we just increase the agc value if it is below the minimum. Thanks, Daniel ----- Original Message ----- De: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> Para: danflu at

> As you can tell, the AAGC integration with speex was really a classic > hack. Instead of re-creating the hack, what's probably best here is to > integrate AAGC back into speex, and have a proper API. Agreed here. If you can come up with a clean patch to add that feature, it's something I'd like to see in Speex. > For those of you just tuning in, what I call

Hi, I have been looking at the speex library and I like it a lot. Good job! I have a couple of questions regarding the preprocessor: 1) I looked at the source code. Even though I am an experienced programmer it looks like Chinese to me ;-) What would I have to do to modify / tweak the audio processing code for my needs? Are there documents describing the algorithms applied for AGC, NS and VAD or

Hi Peter, Can you say a little bit more about what you're doing exactly with the information you're exposing and how? unfortunately, I don't have a concrete proposal in mind right now. That's in part because I don't quite understand the use case, but also because it's really hard to expose this kind of information in a way that both avoids breaking application with new

Hi all, I have recently added Speex support to my app (http://sbooth.org/Max/) and am in the process of creating a GUI for the user to control the codec parameters. I am new to Speex and as such I am not really sure which parameters are more important than others, and deserve prominent placement, etc. Is there a recommended GUI for people to follow or use as an example? Stephen

Hi, I found this message concerning VAD and was wondering whether VAD has been ported to fixed-point in the latest version? Thanks, SingHui ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> Date: Jul 22, 2005 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Fixed-point To: gue baja <gue_baja@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Hi Baja, Here's a quick

Hi, I decide to write to the list because of a strange behaviour when updating from version 1.1.12 to 1.2rc1. My software was running fine with version 1.1.12, but now I want to benefit from advances on AEC. After updating the library to 1.2rc1 and do few changes on my sources, I run the application and discovered that VAD doesn't work so fine as in previous version 1.1.12 (3 years ago). I