similar to: g729 and latency measures

Hi everybody. I'm looking for the way to increase the depth value in 0.01 for each index group. Easier to explain with this example: >my_data=read.table("clipboard", header=TRUE) Depth s_name index 3852 Site_1 144 3852 Site_1 144 3852 Site_1 144 3852 site_A 145 3852 site_A 145 3852 site_A 145 3852 site_A 145 3852 site_B 147 3852 site_B 147 3852 site_B 147 3852 site_B 147 54962

I am trying to trouble shoot one of my ISP's network and compare to my other ISPs offering. Although network 1 is reasonably fast and has low enough latency, voice quality is not good and the reason for this is not readily apparent using standard network tools. What tools can be used to assess the quality of the network in terms of it's suitability for voice? I am using ping, mtr,

Folks, there is an issue pretty buried in the commits list that I suspect should have wider visibility. See r262188 and subsequent discussion. To summarize: it appears that mingw32 was unable to correctly produce a static data member when instantiated as a base class. The "fix" is to then explicitly instantiate the base class separately from its use in a base class. I think this is

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:21 PM Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > First, I'd like to say it would be great if we could get away from relying > on these globally unique pass IDs represented as addresses of globals. Long > ago I tried to hack up a DLL build of LLVM and quickly discovered that > these IDs are the biggest source of dllimported

Lately I've been using some utilities to increase the number of logic errors caught at compile time. I thought they might be useful to the LLVM project. I'd appreciate feedback on the below proposal. Would the community find these useful? -David RFC: Strong typedef utilities for LLVM -------------------------------------- Abstract -------- This proposal

Hi all, I was trying to rebuild mtr (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) and I keep getting: ==== Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0 + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 ++ dirname

Hi, I have been trying to do numerical differentiation using R. I found some old S code using Richardson Extrapolation which I managed to get to work. I am posting it here in case anyone needs it. ######################################################################## richardson.grad <- function(func, x, d=0.01, eps=1e-4, r=6, show=F){ # This function calculates a numerical approximation

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was

On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>

Hi, Suppose I have an arbitrary function: arbfun<-function(x) {...} Is there a robust implementation of a numerical derivative routine in R which I can use to take it's derivative ? Something a bit more than simple division by delta of the difference of evaluating the function at x and x+delta... Perhaps there is a way to do this using D or deriv but I could not figure it out.

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > > same issue as I describe below? > > > >

hi all i have problem with my multi-site AD-DC installation, one of my DC, suddently cant start well, i think problem(corrupt) with the LDAP database then i try to re join it, but every time i try to join it i always has issue like this /Finding a writeable DC for domain 'domain.co.id' Found DC pdc.domain.co.id Password for [domain\administrator]: workgroup is domain realm is

On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 > >>> > >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock > >> ... > >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed. >

Hi there, I have a function which has a variable called show as an input: richardson.grad <- function(func, x, d=0.01, eps=1e-4, r=6, show=F){ # do some things if(show) { cat("\n","first order approximations", "\n") print(a.mtr, 12) } #do more things and return } The show variable is being used as a flag to show intermediate

I want to record all phone calls made inbound and outbound. I'm new so having a hard time getting this started. Here is what I have so far but isn't working. Can someone help me out? Thanks, [macro-record-on] exten => s,1,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=${DATETIME}-${ARG2}-${ARG1}) exten => s,2,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME}) [sip] include => macro-record-on include => iaxtel exten

hello, we have a samba AD DC and some samba fileservers. Version: 4.5.16-Debian (van belle repo) Debaian version: 9.8 Some clients windows 7 and windows 10 randomly lost connection to share. Loglevel is set to 3. But i can't find any relevant entries in the log. How can i debug the connection lost? Best regards;

On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

Just to clarify, I'm looking at this from an application layer Point of View. One of the reasons why I'm looking at it that way, is because Tim said he was looking at LinuxHA..."application level" redundancy that uses IP. Tim, just to let you know, I don't believe that LinuxHA will work in the way you described, only because of the different IP ranges. It looks like Linux

OK, background/config. running * (show version reports 0.9.0) on Mandrake 9.2 (kernel: 2.4.22-32mdk) with a dual 800mhz PIII with 256M Ram 4port FXO digium card, no IRQ sharing I can find (cat /proc/pci & cat /proc/interrupts), vmstat reports a minimum of 80+% CPU idle when problem occurs. connect to a Grandstream 101 (GS) via vpn (no nat). Link has 100ms - 150ms ROUND TRIP latency