similar to: huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)"

2005 Oct 12
1
unloading TE110P bristuffed module cause kernel panic
Hi folks, I've already searched the mailing list but no one else seems to have my same problem. I'm using Asterisk with the following configuration: Fedora Core 4 (but I also tried Fedora 3) 1 Digium TE110P 1 TDM40B 1 HFC-S 'Cologne' bristuff 0.2.0-RC8o (zaptel 1.0.9.2) I compiled right, I can load kernel modules but when I try to unload wcte11xp module (the one
2006 Mar 28
3
R: Echo cancellation
Ok, but is there a way to check if echo cancellation is active on a call in progress ? Thanks Giordano -----Messaggio originale----- Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Steve Davies Inviato: marted? 28 marzo 2006 16.43 A: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Oggetto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation
2006 Jun 19
3
Bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1q and & florz patch compile trouble
Again trouble compiling bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1q with the florz patch on a x86_64 box (I guess nobody is using x86_64 platform or is able to fix this themselves?) First of all when bristuff is downloaded and compile is started it appears that the bristuff Makefiles are badly broken. The asterisk Makefiles all do see to find the kernel sources on a RHEL4 box in the proper directory, the pure
2005 Jan 23
4
Florz patch for zaphfc
Has anyone had any success using the Florz patch for zaphfc ? I have a * system with 2 HFC cards which is working fine with 2 PTP ISDN lines however the users are complaining of crackles on the line which I am assuming is related to the IRQ issues raised by Florz. I have tried to use the patch but it errors trying to patch zaphfc.h Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Stuart -- No virus
2006 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] problem building gcc4 front end on fedora core 5
I'm getting a build error when trying to build gcc4 from sources. This is for the recent 1.9 release. How I built llvm-1.9: ----------------------------- tar zxf llvm-1.9.tar.gz cd llvm-1.9/ ./configure --prefix=/custom/llvm-1.9 make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION='-O2' tools-only make install How I built gcc4: ----------------------------- export
2006 Aug 23
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Hello, It looks like the "Getting Started" is missing some info about the gcc 4.0 frontend. Since it doesn't follow the setup of the cfrontend/gcc3.4 package, a couple sections describing the front end don't cover the gcc4 package. Here are the couple things I'd wish could be fleshed out a bit more: Under "Getting Started Quickly (A Summary)", it'd be nice
2006 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4 on Debian
Ryan Brown wrote: > I don't think llvm-gcc4 uses gccas or gccld, but it can emit bytecode > if you give it the --emit-llvm option: > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc foo.c That's a bit asymmetric with the previous gcc3 version, isn't it? That would mean that the "An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain" section needs to be updated for the gcc4 frontend. OTOH, I could
2007 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] building llvm-gcc4 with a different target name
Hello, I've put together a macports version of llvm and llvm-gcc4, but I've run into a problem with how gcc on the mac works. llvm-gcc4 creates an executable named: /opt/local/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 Which happens to be the same executable in /usr/bin. Because I have /opt/local before /usr/bin, gcc ends up using llvm-gcc4 to build all my code. Most of the time this
2006 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Devang Patel wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> Where -is- that documented? >> >> The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come >> up on the list. =) > > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html ? > > ... > Example with llvm-gcc4 > First, create a simple C file, name it
2006 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4 on Debian
I know that Al Stone has compiled llvm-gcc4 successfully and I can report the same. The problem I consistently run into is that llvm-gcc ends up producing native format output; it does not produce bytecode, nor does it invoke gccas or gccld. I'm using the latest svn, and my configure args are: --prefix=/work/scottm/llvm-cfrontend/obj/../i686-pc-linux-gnu \
2006 Nov 09
4
[LLVMdev] datapoint for recent llvm-gcc4 build failures
I routinely fetch the latest LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 and recompile, perhaps every few days or so. I've not had success in some cases building LLVM-GCC4 on a Gentoo Linux host, for perhaps the last week or so. My system compiler is GCC 4.1.1. >>> cc1: /usr/src/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:151:const llvm::TargetInstrDescriptor&
2006 Aug 24
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:38:36PM -0700, Scott Michel wrote: > There should also be a large notice in 40 point font and bold that says, > "gcc4 does not produce byte code by default: you must use the -emit-llvm > flag to get LLVM byte code." =) Where -is- that documented? The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come up on the list. =) (Which
2006 Aug 25
4
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the
2007 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] compiling llvm-gcc4 on ubuntu
hello, i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend. my steps: i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM" that works fine and without any issues. then i make a new dir called build. from there i do the following: stefan at ubuntu:~/programs/llvm/build$ ../llvm-gcc4-1.9.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/
2007 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] trouble compiling llvm-gcc4 1.9
I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:
2006 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] datapoint for recent llvm-gcc4 build failures
Andrew Purtell wrote: > I routinely fetch the latest LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 and recompile, perhaps every few days or so. I've not had success in some cases building LLVM-GCC4 on a Gentoo Linux host, for perhaps the last week or so. My system compiler is GCC 4.1.1. > > > cc1: /usr/src/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:151:const llvm::TargetInstrDescriptor&
2007 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] What version of GCC to build LLVM-GCC4 on Linux
I am wanting to upgrade my Fedora Core 6's GCC as it is version 4.1.1 and that does not build LLVM-GCC4. What version of GCC is recomended ? Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070303/c5da364e/attachment.html>
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Actually, my request for more info in the "Getting Started" had some > hidden questions, as I don't know the answer to them :) So to be a > little more clear, here are the two I had: > > Does the gcc4 no longer need the "fixheaders" script that the gcc3.4 > frontends uses? > > Is it possible to install both the gcc4 and
2007 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling llvm-gcc4 on ubuntu
Hi Stefan, On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 23:26 +0100, Stefan Weigert wrote: > hello, > > i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend. Okay. Did you read: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedGuide.html ? > > my steps: > i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM" > that works fine and without any issues. Okay. > > then i
2006 Jan 29
2
R 2.1.1 installation fails under Suse 10.0 (PR#8533)
Full_Name: Sigbert Klinke Version: 2.1.1 OS: Suse Linux 10.0 (Full DVD) Submission from: (NULL) (141.20.100.252) Suse 10.0 installs only a Fortran 95 compiler with g77 compability mode. Using this leads in "configure" to an abortion with problems about "FPICFLAGS". Deinstalling g77 compatiblity mode, using f2c, compiles R. But after calling R() the program shows its entrance