similar to: IPComms Setup

A long time ago (Asterisk 0.x, 1.0.x) my experience is that there were alot of interoperability issues, a common troubleshooting issue was to make sure all endpoints where using the latest version of Asterisk. I have not seen these issues in a while. However I've been working with a customer of mine and this ITSP called IP Communications (IPComms.net) well turns out we have had constant

Hello How do I fix this.... [IPComms-in] exten => ${IPCCIDN01},1,Noop(${DATETIME} ${CALLERID}) exten => ${IPCCIDN01},2,SetCallerID(${CALLERID}) exten => ${IPCCIDN02},1,Noop(${DATETIME} ${CALLERID}) exten => ${IPCCIDN02},2,SetCallerID(${CALLERID}) exten => ${IPCCIDN03},1,Noop(${DATETIME} ${CALLERID}) exten => ${IPCCIDN03},2,SetCallerID(${CALLERID}) exten =>

Hi - I am looking for suggestions for ITSPs for faxing with asterisk 1.8. We are based in the US, so would need an ITSP with US DIDs. #1) We would like to use Fax For Asterisk with asterisk 1.8.4 in order to receive faxes via T.38. Sending faxes is not a requirement. Does anyone have a working asterisk 1.8.4 configuration and ITSP provider that they can recommend? We have been trying T.38

Dear Sirs, I?m writting a pam module for Radius authentication, which should allow a remote login via ssh on a Linux machine with an openssh server. In particular, the user which is configured at the remote Radius server is not present on the local user database of the Linux machine. Unfortunatly, openssh will not allow to start a PAM user authentication if cannot find the user login in the

I've just started consulting for a SME client based in Reston Virginia. They don't know it yet but they are going to need a hosted asterisk service and some DID's. Email me if you are able to provide 10 DID's in Reston (must be able to be ported away!!) and hosted Asterisk with end user configurable IVR etc. Probably only 5-8 users at the moment BUT... they'll be

I have (more than 1) provider that I receive calls from using IAX, and I have 2 IAX deskphones, all work fine except for some reason with 1 provider, when the call comes in, it doesn't match up with the incomingcall context. (A bit worrying, since I don't want people to be able to relay calls off me.) in iax.conf I have: [ipcomms] type=user nat=yes dtmfmode=rfc2833 host=71.16.179.149

Ever since upgrading to 1.6 I get messages like these. I want everything else that shows up, but is there a way to make all the dns messages go away? Ira > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'gw5.telasip.com' > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'sipconnect.ipcomms.net' > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'proxy.ideasip.com' > ast_get_srv: SRV lookup for

> Very strange... > I ran the Asterisk CLI for other tasks, and suddenly I got this message: > > == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 > -- Executing [000972592603325 at default:1] Verbose("SIP/192.168. > 20.120-0000002a", "2,PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325") innew stack > == PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325 > -- Executing

Hello All, Do you guys suggest any 1800 DID Provider in the US ? I'm having a hard time to find one. Thanks, Marco -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091127/63d93945/attachment.htm

Anyone have a good provider for International (US/Canada at least) 800 termination/origination? I have a customer that had us port one of their 800 numbers and apparently didn't realize that they had published that number in Canada as well. Our current origination/termination provider can't handle Canadian inbound calls to that number, so I need to find another provider that can.

Hi list! Very strange... I ran the Asterisk CLI for other tasks, and suddenly I got this message: == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [000972592603325 at default:1] Verbose("SIP/192.168.20.120-0000002a", "2,PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325") in new stack == PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325 -- Executing [000972592603325 at default:2]

Le 19/11/2014 16:33, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > You need to post the complete debug log. It's in /tmp on the > conversion server. Ah nice, I ignored that. Here it is: virt-v2v: libguestfs 1.28.1 (x86_64) [ 0.0] Opening the source -i libvirtxml /tmp/virt-p2v-20141119-z1eg0fua/physical.xml libvirt xml is: <?xml version="1.0"?> <!-- NOTE! This libvirt XML is

Kevin Larsen <kevin.larsen at pioneerballoon.com> schrieb: > Based on SIP packets coming in from IP addresses you don't recognize, > while you may not be hacked, you would seem to have people probing your I think, too, it's someone probing my IP... > system. One thing you can do at the firewall level is restrict inbound sip > communications to only those from your

Hello, I have a block of 25 DIDs and have 10 phones on the network. I want when a person tries to call out for * to pick a number for the CIDN and I want to make sure that the number isn't duplicated while it's in use. Joshua __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com

All, I've put a new asterisk server at another location and can't seem to get it working. What's the best strategy to debug connections? I'm doing inbound SIP only and have installed the server in the same way as I did on my DEV server. Running an nmap on localhost shows the port listening: ---------- [asterisk]/> nmap -sU localhost Starting Nmap 4.11 (

Hi All, As is obvious by my joining the list, I'm interested in learning more about Asterisk. I have downloaded the PDF manual (for version 1.4) and am beginning to go through it. What I'm looking for in the short- term, however, is a more concise reference for common Asterisk configurations and setups. I currently have a non-profit client to which I am donating work. They

It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk on a VM running on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported by perf were as follows: 69.75% 0.59% fio [k] down_write 69.15% 0.01% fio [k] call_rwsem_down_write_failed 67.12% 1.12% fio [k] rwsem_down_write_failed 63.48% 52.77% fio [k] osq_lock 9.46% 7.88% fio [k]

It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk on a VM running on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported by perf were as follows: 69.75% 0.59% fio [k] down_write 69.15% 0.01% fio [k] call_rwsem_down_write_failed 67.12% 1.12% fio [k] rwsem_down_write_failed 63.48% 52.77% fio [k] osq_lock 9.46% 7.88% fio [k]

On 02/10/2017 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43:09AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >> It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk >> on a VM running on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported >> by perf were as follows: >> >> 69.75% 0.59% fio [k] down_write >> 69.15% 0.01% fio [k]

On 02/10/2017 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43:09AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >> It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk >> on a VM running on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported >> by perf were as follows: >> >> 69.75% 0.59% fio [k] down_write >> 69.15% 0.01% fio [k]