similar to: Asterisk install error ...

Hi; It is my first time installing an asterisk PBX system . I do have a TDM400 wildcard with 4 FXO moduls on a PC with 3.0GHZ HT CPU and INTEL 915 moatherboard . Fedora C2 Linux as O.S. and I have the latest CVS astreisk , Zaptel and Libpri downloaded the zaptel drivers installation and configuration seems to be fine and the libpri but when I tried to compile and install the asterisk software

Hi, I've seen a few posts about this but no fix. Anyone able to help? Here's what I did: I configured a brand new machine with Redhat 9.0. I made sure that I had: bison cvs gcc kernel-source libtermcap-devel ncurses-devel newt-devel openssl1096b openssl-devel readline41 readline-devel zlib zlib-devel When I went to get Asterisk I did the following: cvs checkout zaptel libpri and

I got the error below while compiling asterisk. Please offer me some help. hubert for x in res channels pbx apps codecs formats agi cdr astman stdtime; do make -C $x depend || exit 1 ; done make[1]: Entering directory `/etc/asterisk/asterisk-0.7.2/res' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `depend'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/etc/asterisk/asterisk-0.7.2/res' make[1]: Entering

Thanks a lot for the reference how to make the regtest. One last question please, if understand this correctly, the --use-ntvfs isnot available by default when installing the Debian package, so I need to compile samba with --with-ntvfs-fileserver to make the option available? On 11/14/19 8:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 07:30 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah wrote: >> Hi,

Just checked out the latest from cvs and trying a make clean; install on asterisk produced the following errors: chan_zap.c: In function `zt_handle_event': chan_zap.c:3083: `ZT_EVENT_DTMFDIGIT' undeclared (first use in this function) chan_zap.c:3083: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once chan_zap.c:3083: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [chan_zap.o] Error 1

Hi, I am trying to get some integration tests running in CI with a software uses samba4 AD for authentication. So basically I would like spin up a build and provision a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD. On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:

Thank you for the answers, Jakob! That's really informative for someone who is still new to LLVM like me. Please see my responses below. -Ghassan  ________________________________ From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, August 16,

Dear ALL: I installed Samba2.0.7 on redhat6.2. First I chose the security = user, then I always could not pass test 8 or test 9 from win2000. The error message says either "access denied" or "Could not log int from the work station" while I am sure that the host allow parameter allows this computer. Also I set "encrypt passwords = yes" and created a smbpassword

Hi Renato, Please see my answers below. Thanks -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com>; "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Experimental

Hi again, it seems that the configure option (--with-ntvfs-fileserer, --enable-developer) are not available on samba-4.11.2. I get the following error: + --enable-developer --with-ntvfs-fileserver --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --sbindir=/usr/sbin/ --bindir=/usr/bin/ --without-systemd --with-statedir=/var/lib/samba --with-cachedir=/var/cache/samba

On 19 September 2013 17:25, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > Ghassan: You have made me so curious to try other benchmarks in our future > work. Most academic publications on CPU performance though use SPEC. You > can even find some recent publications that are still using SPEC CPU2000! > When I was at AMD in 2009, performance optimization and benchmarking

On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Ghassan Shobaki wrote: > One factor that is causing our current register pressure estimate to be off is not being able to properly account for live-in and live-out registers (both virtual and physical). As far as we can tell, LLVM represents live-in regs with CopyFromReg instrs and live-out regs with CopyToReg instrs. However, it looks that in a given basic block,

I have been doing some benchmarking on x86 using llvm 2.9 with the llvm-gcc 4.2 front end. I noticed that the -march and -mtune options make a significant positive difference in x86-32 mode but hardly make any difference in x86-64 mode. The small difference that I am measuring when the target is x86-64 could easily be random variation, while for the x86-32 target I am measuring a huge difference

On 17 September 2013 19:04, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > We have done some experimental evaluation of the different schedulers in > LLVM 3.3 (source, BURR, ILP, fast, MI). The evaluation was done on x86-64 > using SPEC CPU2006. We have measured both the amount of spill code as well > as the execution time as detailed below. > Hi Ghassan, This is an

Hi, We are working on a research project whose objective is developing a pre-allocation scheduling algorithm that achieves the optimal balance between exploiting ILP (hiding latencies) and minimizing register pressure.  A prototype of our algorithm has been implemented and integrated into an experimental version of LLVM 2.9. Our algorithm is based on a combinatorial optimization approach, which

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the

Hi, We are currently working on revising a journal article that describes our work on pre-allocation scheduling using LLVM and have some questions about LLVM's pre-allocation scheduler. The answers to these question will help us better document and analyze the results of our benchmark tests that compare our algorithm with LLVM's pre-allocation scheduling algorithm. First, here is a

Hi Andy, Please see my in-line answers below. Regards -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM On Sep 23, 2011, at

Which options are you seeing that cause the largest difference, and on which targets? As Chandler mentioned there has been a large amount of variation in x86 targets, and there are certain optimizations that can be done, on say a Pentium (scheduling instructions which are pairable and non-dependent so the U and V pipelines are saturated without contention, for example) that don't make sense

Hi, We are using LLVM 2.9 (with the llvm-gcc front end) to compile and run the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks on x86. We are compiling and running the benchmarks on a an Intel Xeon E5540 processor running Ubuntu 10.10 (64-bit version). For the native x86-64 target, we are using the following command-line arguments: -O3 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 and are getting compile-time errors on the gamess and