similar to: (no subject)

Umm... is there any rational reason to only announce the CentOS-5.3 Live CD on May 27, when it was available since May 19, and Patrice has updated the Release Notes on the same May 19? The CD date is indeed 19-May-2009 02:50 and I've found it on May 21 on all the mirrors I've checked. I was persuaded that the only 5.3 LiveCD available was from ScientificLinux, and I've checked with

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Well, good news and bad news. I backed up the indexes (presumably the ~/.mbox/.imap/*) and started tinkering: dovecotadm -u username INBOX did nothing, it didn't event produce a message in the log, and the indexes were not updated. I deleted the indexes, and let dovecot rebuild them. This fixed my inbox (good news), unfortunately, even after copying the backed-up files back I can no longer

Not really. I tried copying the inbox and wanted to delete half the messages to filter out the problematic one, but opening the copy works fine. What could be the culprit? Does dovecot keep some index that might be corrupted? On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 02:43:01PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 21.08.2016 13:59, Ladislav Laska wrote: > > Hi! > > > > dovecot -n and backtrace are

Well, I tried. for i in {1..50}; do echo x | mail -s test krakonos+test at krakonos.org; done and running lsof. Didn't catch a single lockfile. lsof runs about 1s, so there is little chance of catching it. However, I was reading the mails while they were being delivered, and didn't trigger the problem. I'll let it happen once more, so I know it's still reproducible and add

Is there any known way how to redirect all 404 errors to a stream? I can see many request to non-existing publish points (mostly old streams that are no longer active) and I would like to redirect them to one specific mount with audio loop (looped stream)... but I don't want to create relay streams manually for each non-existing pubpoint, but rather create one general "404 relay"...

ooohhh :) interesting... didn't think about that... I was stuck on catching 404 and there is a new default mount config... I will try this... after quick test, there are some problems with the default mount, but it may be because of wrong configuration... I will have to experiment with the settings. thanks :) -- *Ladislav Soukup* *specialista v?voje IT aplikac?* mobil: +420 731 101 538

Is here: https://lwn.net/Articles/475592/ (sorry if it's not available to non-subscribers yet). Really good overview of our current status. Jeremy.

Hello, I have configured Dovecot 1.2.12 with Postfix 2.6.5 and everything is working fine. But tomorrow I wanted to run IMAP ALCs and from log I found that this plugin is conflicting with parameter mail_full_filesystem_access = yes in my config. But when I set mail_full_filesystem_access = no it stops authorization for postfix with this message: <pasek at valbek.cz>: Command died with

Hi! dovecot -n and backtrace are both attached in my original email, due to their size. Did the attachments not arrive? The relevant log does not contain much more than the trace, but here it is: Aug 21 12:58:28 ibex dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<krakonos>, method=PLAIN, rip=77.48.73.189, lip=78.108.107.19, mpid=17785, TLS, session=<Q5igz5I66sxNMEm9> Aug 21 12:58:28 ibex

A nice little insight into CentOS : http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature Cheers Didi p.s. Sorry if this has already been posted :) -- Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger http://contact.ribalba.de

For anyone still on gcc 4.2.1, then I think this entire discussion is kind of irrelevant, because they are already having to build a new toolchain to compile LLVM, since the minimum is currently 4.7. So for those people, I would imagine 4.7 vs. 4.9 makes no difference? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the table of the distrowatch page, but if FreeBSD 11 has clang 3.8 as you say, why does

The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue. FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have LLVM 3.9 and GCC 4.9. NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM 3.8. Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that it also has LLVM 3.8. Going back to what Joerg said earlier. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=netbsd says NetBSD 7 ships with GCC 5.3, but Joerg said 4.8. Which is it? And even

Hi, is there anyone running Icecast stream over HTTPS. Is it even possible? We are updating our iOS app and there is the new Transport security... For now, it can be disabled per domain, bud in future, this may be a problem... :) -- *Ladislav Soukup* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi! > Somehow Dovecot thinks that the mbox file changed under it.. Yes. And it's probably right, but I wonder what could have changed it. I looked around inotify and it seems there is no way to let a file being watched and get program names/pids of processes accessing it. > These mbox corruptions are usually pretty difficult to reproduce (= impossible to fix without ability to

I see a lot of people talking about c++14 and *maybe* clang-N.N.N will support it, but is there any tests which can be used to actually/tangibly verify this? Is there tests for the features being proposed to take advantage of? It would be prudent to ensure there's tests available to verify on buildbots before any decision to switch is made. Break this into steps and it becomes a plan instead

Hello, does anybody have experience with delivery of double attachments into Outlook? I suppose that this would be a problem of Outlook 2010 but to be sure I'd like to ask here as we are using Dovecot 2.0.11 Best Regards Ladislav

Dobr? den, od 23.12. do 30.12. jsem na dovolen?. V p??pad? nutnosti volejte na mobil. S pozdravem Bc. Ladislav Pa?ek vedouc? odd?len? IT a vizualizace mobil: +420 776 140 489 e-mail: pasek at valbek.cz Valbek, s.r.o. Va?urova 505/17, 460 02 Liberec 3 tel./fax: +420 485 103 336, +420 485 103 346 www.valbek.cz