similar to: SIP callid

Hi, To combine two sources of CDR's I want Asterisk to save the SIP callid for all calls. I know there's a variable that contains the SIP CallID value, but is this the callid value of the incoming INVITE message or the outgoing message? Are they the same? (I've not yet checked a trace, I'm sorry for that). I've tried to read chan_sip, but couldn't find something in the

Hello everyone Is there a possibility to catch an outbound callleg ID for the follovong scenario: some carrier -----> ------(asterisk1) --->-----asterisk2 ? I can get inbound callid for asterisk1 with a ${SIPCALLID} in extensions.conf or to look it up in cdrs field (are the same). But how about outbound? I have all calls just forwarded through asterisk1, not answered and for every call I

I am building a package that makes a simple visualization. A part of the code is in C++, and utilizes the functions srand() and rand() for purposes not related to statistics (introducing random noise in the visualization). The package compiles without problems on my workstation(s), but when I submitted it to the winbuilder service, I got the following weird message: * checking compiled code ...

Erik, I was thinking of doing this: export MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(awk 'BEGIN { srand(); print int(rand() * 32767 % 255 + 1) }') Or would you prefer using 'date'? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>wrote: > Jesse Weinstein wrote: > > > The subject line mostly says it all, but for reference, having #!/bin/sh > causes

Hi everyone, sorry if this has been answered before - I caught a whiff of a discussion about c's rand() function in a mailing list archive, but couldn't find a definitive answer. I'm trying to do a simple CS project on my machine where I generate two sets of values in parallel using rand() and am running into infinite loops of values, and couldn't figure out why, so I wrote a test

Here are some of the patches that I have maintained in the patch queue of my packages that I maintain within the Debian distribution (http://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libguestfs.html). All of them address FTBFS (fail to build from source) errors that happened with the particular configuration that is used for building the Debian package. Cheers, -Hilko

These calls are in ExternalCalls.cpp, they are platform dependent calls, so maybe llvm should consider including it's own implementation of a random number generator? For the time being I just replaced with calls to srand and rand like Paolo also did, but it needs to be fixed... m.

Dear all, In our LLVM-based compiler pipeline a major part of code generation is taken into application runtime. One side-effect of this organization is a need to be very careful about using code that might diverge application state. And we found that simple generation of temporary files over LLVM APIs introduces random noise into the program result. There reason is that LLVM's

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 12 March 2013 16:48, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> The former mode is historically what the test suite did, the latter mode >> is substantially faster (and independent of bugs in the native CC). >> > > Yes, I agree this is better for many cases, but

Here I am again... I missed that in the previous diff, they are the usual missing <algorithm> and the std:: namespace missing in sort, find, make_pair. Alkis can you please give them an eye when you have time? The next major problem is that VC has only int rand(void) void srand( int seed ) So I donno how to compile the ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the

Dear all, Am new on this list but need help: I have a fortran code which I compile into a dynamic library (on Solaris). My probem is that when I call this code soon after starting R, it runs ok. But it doesn't for the second time without exiting R first. In this code I have to generate some random numbers. The problem is not about setting the seed. Anyone with an idea what might be going

Agreed, done. One thing I'm not sure about is this statement in docs: POSIX.1-2008 marks *rand_r*() as obsolete. - And... what is the replacement? 2012/12/1 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> > If we're keeping the state locally now, perhaps we should store it in a > per-thread variable. I know rand() isn't thread safe to begin with, but it > seems

On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Вадим Марковцев wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've added the "S" suffixed versions of ARM and Thumb2 instructions to tablegen. Those are, for example, "movs" or "muls". > Of course, some instructions have already had their twins, such as add/adds, and I leaved them untouched. Adding separate "s" instructions is

Hmm, I guess I need a sys::Math::getRandom() function that uses a "good" random number generator on the given platform. I'll make a note of this and tuck it away for future implementation. Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > >>The next major problem is that VC has only >> >>int rand(void) >>void srand(

Hello Anyone have a working copy of Fail2ban asterisk filter asterisk.conf for Asterisk 16 running PJSIP. I have tried 10 different filters but none of them show any matches when testing with fail2ban-regex I see date template hits but no matches.... My log [2019-06-06 15:37:20] NOTICE[18081] res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c: Request 'REGISTER' from '"2405" <sip:2405 at

I am not getting any caller Id with my standard T-1. Is a standard "T" capable of sending callerid? I don't want to spend time troubleshooting my PBX if Asterisk can't send it down that type of trunk. Jordan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everyone, I've added the "S" suffixed versions of ARM and Thumb2 instructions to tablegen. Those are, for example, "movs" or "muls". Of course, some instructions have already had their twins, such as add/adds, and I leaved them untouched. Besides, I propose the codegen optimization based on them, which removes the redundant comparison in patterns like orr

I am trying to run the configure for 1.2.2 on an intel solaris 2.7 box and I get an error for urandom not found. I cant find anything related to rand, urand, random, rng, or urandom on my box. How can I get around this, or where can I get urandom? Chris

Dear R experts, we are preparing an R-package to compute the Oja Median which contains some C++ code in which random numbers are needed. To generate the random numbers we use the following Mersenne-Twister implementation: // MersenneTwister.h // Mersenne Twister random number generator -- a C++ class MTRand // Based on code by Makoto Matsumoto, Takuji Nishimura, and Shawn Cokus // Richard J.

If we're keeping the state locally now, perhaps we should store it in a per-thread variable. I know rand() isn't thread safe to begin with, but it seems like rand_r() can be since it should keep no external state. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org>wrote: > Dear all, > > In our LLVM-based compiler pipeline a major part of code